ML053220520
| ML053220520 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 09/04/2002 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 1-2002-A-0113, FOIA/PA-2004-0191 | |
| Download: ML053220520 (2) | |
Text
- 'g a
g:Xalleg~panel\\20020113arb.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.:' RI-2002-A-0113 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: SaIe'm-Ho6e Creek Acknowledged: No ARB Date:
9/04/2002 Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: Poten'tial violation of 50.7. Emolovee Protection, in that the alleger was discriminated against for raising a concemrnthrough the corrective action process.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
N/A ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Iordation ic this rd Attendees: Chair - Clifford Branch Chief (AOC) - Meyer SAC -ed 0O Rep. -
Lefts RI Counsel -
Fewell Others - Crliak. Barkl DISPOSITION ACTIONS: (List actions for processing and closure. Note responsible person(s), form of action closure document(s), and estimated completion dates.)
- 1)
Acknowledgment letter to the alleger along with his DOL rights.
Responsible Person:
SAC ECD:
9/22/2002 Closure Documentation:
Completed:
- 2)
Regional Counsel determined tha(
Responsible Person:
Fewell ECD: _
Closure Documentation:
Completed: 9/4/02
- 3) 01 to open up a case (1 -2002-033) and Interview the alleger to gather additional Information regarding the discrimination that the individual was subjected to as well as the 'nature of the protected activitybhe was engaged in.
Responsible Person:
Letts ECD:
TBD Closure Documentation:
Completed:_
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: The risk significance of this concern appears low to moderate as it is unclear whether the Individual was engaged in a protected activity and wheththerthe alleged discrimination actually constituted a clear violation of CFR 50.7 (i.e._
position or compensation were not impacted by the temporary suspension of his badge, u the action alone could be considered adverse).
PRIORITY OF 0l INVESTIGATION:
Medium
( girJ1)
If potential discriminatidn or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie,.lack of specific Indication of wrongdoing):
Request that 01 Interview the alleger to obtain additional Information to determine whether it Is prudent to continue with an InvestigatIon In this case.
ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB
- 7411k,
L v
2 Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress):
No indication that the individual has filed with DOL at this time.
ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation ba 01. DOL. or DOJI:
What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?_
When did the potential violation occur?__
(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.
NOTES: (Include other oertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if aporopriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)