ML053220499

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Allegation Review Board Disposition, Regarding Allegation R1-2002-A-0113
ML053220499
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/11/2003
From:
NRC Region 1
To:
References
1-2002-A-0113, FOIA/PA-2004-0191
Download: ML053220499 (1)


Text

.

  • gX:a1Ieg~panbeI20020113arb4.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0113 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer.

Site/Facility: Salem & Hope Creek Acknowiedged: Yes ARB Date:

3/11/2003 Confideritiality Granted: No Issue discussed: The alleger was originally concerned with

'ability to perform duties in accordance with the Transient Assessment Response Plan Jij tear' formation procedui When cohtacted by Olichose not be'interviewed and 'stated th'atJould try to resolve concerns within the PSA orrective actionr process. The NRC issued a conditional closeout Iet to the alleger stating that the NRC il consider this aliegation 'dosed unlessWcontacts us within 30 days of the date of the letter,,did conta'ct NRC in a November120, 20O2; etter and stated that vanted the NRC to keep the issue open.

In a telephone'call and subsequent letter dated 12/20/02, the alleger wants the NRC to pursue his H&I claim and address the TARP issue.

DRP'reviewed.a 2/19/03 transcript (01 Case No.1-2003-010) to determine if any new technical issue could be identified.

Alleger contacted p'rior to referral to'licensee (if applicable)?

Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: - Chair - Rogie Branch Chief (AOC) - Mever SAC - Vito 01 Rep...-;Wilson

.RI Counsel-

' Others -

White.-McFadden DISPOSITION ACTIONS: (Listactions forprocessing and closure. Note responsIble person(s),

form'of a'cti6n clo'sure'document(s),'and estimated completion dates.)

1)

. DRP`corioplete'dreview of the 2/19/03 transcript and did not identify any new technical issues.,

.Responsibie Person: Barber/Meyer.

ECD:

Closure Docuernnftation:

Cornpleted: 3/11/03

-~ ;

-.:--a:-.!. i-.

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT-.'

PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION: -

Alleger. initially declined to havethe NRC pu ueiscrimination 'issue;. Thus-Ol C0

-20 033-was ciosed since.'th'e.alleer agreed o _immediate safety-isues existed a'eih lwa's~'

contacted by 01..During.this initial conta-twtold 0b didc notUwant't'o" beintervidwed 12/20 letter, no nieww technical info'rationwas providedwarrant raising 0's piority;on this case.

eir,

.A t

v..>

J

'.'6

!..,--:t.

t -

I' NOTES:. (Inciude 6the'r ertinent comments.: Also include considerations related to licensee referral if dobropriate. Identify anv ootential generic issues)

Distribution: Panel Attendees;- Regional Counsei, 01, Responsible Individual '(original to SAC) lnformation in this record was deleted in accordance with,thq Freedom of Information

-Actexemptions

~~~~~~FI-.i~-og

.[.

-*o-......

ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB

.