ML053220397
| ML053220397 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 01/08/2004 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 1-2002-A-0113, FOIA/PA-2004-0191 | |
| Download: ML053220397 (2) | |
Text
g:\\alleg\\panel\\20020113arb7.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0113 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem & Hope Creek Acknowledged: Yes ARB Date: 1/8/04 Confidentiality Granted: No
,4>1c...
Issue discussed: The alleger was originally concerned wit ability to perfor duties In cordance with the Transient Assessment Response Plan (TARP) team formation procedure. When contacted by 01 chose not be Interviewed and stated thatl would try to resolve ' ncers within the PSEG corrective action-rocess. The NRC Issued a conditional closeout letter to the alleger Htting that the NRC will consider this allegation closed unlessq
.ontacts us within 30 days of the date of the letter. rld contact NRC in a November 20, 2002, letter and stated that wanted the NRC to keep the issue open.
In a telephone call and subsequent letter dated 12/20102, the alleger wanted the NRC to pursuer fH&I claim and wanted to address the TARP issue.
DRP reviewed a 2/19103 01 transcript (previously completed) and the final 01 Report (01 Case no.1-2003-010) and did-not identify any new technical Issues. In their final report, Of did not substantiate that H&i took place.
In a 912/03 information package, the alleger Indicated that PSEG Is showing a continuing pattern of discrimination since he/she is taking medication that precludes him/her from being on the TARP team (Medical Department at PSEG Is aware) but yet the individual received an unsatisfactory mid-year performance appraisal on 8128/03.
01 completed their final review of the alleger's discrimination case ((1-2003-01 OS) and did not find sufficient evidence to prove that discrimination occurred.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Blouph Branch Chief (AOC) - Meyer SAC - Vito 01 Rep. - Wilson, Neff, Teator RI Counsel - Farrar Others - Barber, Holody. Eichenholz DISPOSITION ACTIONS:
- 1)
DRP completed review of the final discrimination case (1-2003-010s) and did not identify any new technical issues.
Responsible Person:
Barber ECD:
01/08104 Closure Documentation:'
Completed: 01/06/04
- 2) 3 Week OE Memo - Supplemental 01 Investigation 1-2002-01OS Responsible Person:
SAC ECD:
1/16/2004 Closure Documentation:
Completed:
- 3)
Closeout letter to alleger and licensee with 01 summary.
Responsible Person:
SAC ECD:
1/30/2004 Closure Documentation:
Completed:
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT:
Information In this record was deleted in accordance with the Fre omof InfomaUon Act.,exemptions 1
FOIARBMUS AN-PE qA A ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARBl F-lt
2 PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
Alleger initially declined to have the NRC pursue his discrimination issue. Thus, the original 01 Case (1-2002-033) was closed since the alleger did not want to be interviewed and agreed no immediate safety issues existed when j-as contacted by 0l. In 12/20 letter, no new technical information was provided to warrant raising 01's priority on fhis case. Later, he/she requested that 01 pursue H&I. In their final report, 01 did not substantiate that H&l took place.
Regional Counsel made determination thatF N-