ML052660157

July 2005 Initial Examination - Various Checklists

ML052660157
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	07/18/2005
From:	Beilby M NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Shared Package
ML052640468	List: ML052660131 ML052660141 ML052660157
References
50-346/05-301
Download: ML052660157 (15)

Text

VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE DAVIS-BESSE INITIAL EXAMINATION JULY 2005

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: Davis-Besse Date of Examination: 7/18-22; 25-28/05 Developed by: Written - Facility E NRC I/ Operating - Facility NRC Target Chief Date' Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials I i

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a: C.2.a and b)

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 13f4

6. Integrated examination outl;ne(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3.

ES-301-1. ES-301-2. ES-301-5. ES-D-1's. ES-401-1/2.ES-401-3.and ES-401-4. as aoolicable (C.1.e and f: C.3.d)

(-70) I (7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e))

(-45) 0. Proposed examinations (including written. walk-through JPMs. and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3. ES-301-4. ES-301-5. ES-301-6. and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e. f, g and h C.3.d) "' ' 1

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202) 4f@

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202)

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) MF

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1 .j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) w 9

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor fC.2.i: C.3.h) %3

-7 14. Final applications reviewed: 1 or 2 (if >lo) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility: and examination approval and waiver letters Sent fifq (C.2.i: Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e: ES-204)

-7 15. Proctoringlwrittenexam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) WY

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job petformance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) N%3

• Target dates are generally based on facility-preparedexaminations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] (Does not apply) to examinations prepared by the NRC.

- - ~

ES-201

.- - ~

Examination Outline -

Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2

~

'acility: Davis Besse Date of Examination: 7/18/2005 Initials Item Task Description

1. 3. Verify that the outline@)fitis) the appropriate model per ES-401 w

R 3. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance I with Section D . l of ES-401 and whether all WA categories are appropriately sampled.

T T .: Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems. evolutions, or generic topics.

E N i Assess whether the iustlficatlons for deselected or rejected WA statements are appropriate.

2. 3. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed Scenario sets cover the required number S of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and I

major transients.

M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected U number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; and ensure that each applicant L can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. that no A scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s). and scenarios will not be T repeated on subsequent days.

0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

w (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, I distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form T

(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form, (3)' no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) L (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimum number on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form

. . at least one task is new or significantly modified (2)

(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.

b. Assess whether the IOCFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

~~ ~

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

Date

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer i')

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) $5-d NRC Supelvisor NOTE. # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.

9 NUREG-1021. Revision 9

LZ P 9Z *d 'bW93 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination 05 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 1 \ y d ! 0 5 + 7 j ~ ~ofsthe date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

ES-201, Page 26 of 27

N i",' .

Q 1.

r 0

m' r

c, r(

3 m

i c

0 bl L

U u

0 Q

a N

m 0

L o 0

0 m

A TI

ES-201 Examlnatlc I acknowledge that I have acquired speciaiiiedknodedge a w l the NRC llcendng examinationsscheduled for the week@)of TL$&

date of my signatwe. Iagree that Iwill not knowlngtydlvulge any information about lhese examinaticnsto any panms who hav no been authMJZad as of the by the NRC chief examlner. I understand thal Iam not to inOlrVcl, evaluate, or provide performancefeedbadc io those applicants scheduledto be administeredthese licenslng examinallonsfrom thii dale until completion of examinafionadmlnlstratlon, except as specifically noted below and I authorized by the NRC (B.Q., acttng as a rlmulator b o t h operator or communlcator is acceptable if Ihe individualdoes no1select the trainingcontent or provlde dlrect or indireclleedback). Furthermore. I am aware of Ihe physical senrity measures and requirements (as documentedin the faulily licensee's procedures) and underslandthat violationof h e mndlliins of lhls agreement may result In mncenalionof the examhations andlor an enforcementaction against me or the f a a l ilicensee. Iwill immediately rep& to facllliy management or the NRC chief examiner any indicatims or

L 3 0 m m suggestionsthat examinationsecurity may have been compromised.

1. Pos1.Examinatlon To the best of my kno ge, I d rmt divulge to any UMUthOkRd persons any informationmneeming the NRC lkenslng examinations administered during the week(8) O f ' W F r o m the date that IEntered into this security agreement until the completh of examlnalion administration. I dld not Inslruct, evaluate, or pmvldeperfwmancefeedbeck to those applicants who wre administeredthese licensing examinations, except a9 specifically noted below and authwlzed by the NRC.

4 a

c ES-201,Page 26 of 27 i

a w l

.- - - --~ ~ _ _ . ~

-ES-301-

- - - _ _ Operating Test QuaLChecklist

~ ~- Form ES-301-3 Facility: Davis Besse Date of Examination: 7/18/2005 Operating Test Number: NRC

~

1. GENERAL CRITERIA

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

' initial conditions

• initiating cues

• references and tools, including associated procedures

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific

$&(

designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee

• operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues A@

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant h*

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC w !$#

examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2. ---

3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA Joseph G. Arsenault

b. Facility Reviewer r)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. a R C Supervisor NOTE: ' The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility Davis Besse Date of Exam 7/18/2005 Scenario Numbers 1/2/314/5 Operatin Test No.: NRC QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service. but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

- the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible Drecedina incident such as a seismic event.

5 The events are valid with reaard to DhvSics and thermodvnamics

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary' clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced Dlant have been evaluated to ensure that functional

~~ ~~

fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated. as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Davis Eesse Date of Exam: 7/18/2005 Operating Test No.: NRC A Scenarios NUREG 1021 Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Scenarios z-1 MINIMUM 4 4 2 0 2 2 2 2 1 NUREG 1021 Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 A E Scenarios P E 1 2 3 4 T L N 0 I T T MiNlMUM C CREW CREW POSiTlON CREW POSITION CREW POSlTiON A POSITION A T L Instructions:

1. Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must sewice in both the 'at-the-controls (ATC)" and "balance-of-plant(BOP)"

positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and One major transient. in the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or contmlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (') Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a I-for-I basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctionsshould be included: only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence munt toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

NUREG 1021 Revision 9

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Davis Besse Date of Examination: 7/18/2005 Operating Test NO.: NRC I APPLICANTS Competencies SCENARIO - -

1 5 InterpreVDiagnose 2.3 1.2 2.3 2.4 3.7 Events and Conditions 2; .3. .4. .4. .5, 8. .8 7 4;" 6,9 5.6 8 7 Comply With and Use Procedures (1) 2,4 :

.5, 4,5 1,2 (9

(

43 1.2 2.3

.4.

1.3

.5, 6.8 7.8

.6 .6 -

Operate Control Boards (2) 1 I I I I NA NA NA NA NA 2.3

.4, 1.3

.7.

8 I 1 I 1 I 6.8 Communicate and 2.3 13 Interact 1-8 1-7 1-9 1-6 1-8 ,4. ,5.

6.8 7.8 Demonstrate 1-8 1-7 1-9 1-6 1-8 NA NA Supervisory Ability (3) - -

Comply With and Use Tech. SDecs. (3)

I I 1 1 I 1.3 1.4 4,5 1.5 3.4 NA NA Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicants'license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

.- .- - __ .- . ... . .~ ~ .~

ES-401

~. .- ~~ Written Examination Quality Checklist Form-01 -6 Facility: Davis Besse Date of Exam:

Item Description 7/18/2005 RO~SRO 1

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility.

2. a. NRC WAS referenced for all questions.

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available.

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401

4. The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than 4 RO and 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL Program Office)

5. Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started. or

__ the examinations were developed independently, 01

__XX the licensee certifies that there is no duplication, or other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified): enter the actual RO / SRO-only ly%/ 10 question distribution(s) at right. 3B

• z/7 1 30114

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the question on the Memo CIA RO exam are written at the comprehension/

analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 %T/ 9 %e/16 percent if the randomly selected WAS support the  ? f If higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO question distribution@) at right

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix 6.

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point. multiple choice items: the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet.

a. Author 5/25/2005

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. ff?\lRC Regional Supewisor Note:

• The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

&y, e d c o ~ d ~/--+7 s clr. Lf p,yI- dLs<dsv.G< -/

L~epucLey b/7/b14 NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified I I

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NamelSignature Date

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (")

~

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; ES-403, Page 5 of 5