ML052650358
| ML052650358 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 09/13/2005 |
| From: | Roisman A National Legal Scholars Law Firm, PC |
| To: | Zorn J NRC/OGC |
| References | |
| ASLBP 04-832-02-OLA | |
| Download: ML052650358 (4) | |
Text
NATIONAL LEGAL SCHOLARS LAW FiRMm, PXC,.
84 EAST TIETFORD ROAD LYnME, Nil, 03768 603.795.4245 603.795.4246 (FAx)
NNfl'VW.NATIONALLECALSCIIOLARS.CONI AMANAGING PARTNER ANnIIONY Z. ROISMAN A FFILIA TE Dartmouth College (Research Fellow)' a JONATHAN S. NIAM asmamnationallegalscholars cornm D.47T7RNEY5 SSEY AFFIuA TED TTORNEES PROF. ERWI N CIIE51ERINSNY Duke University Lawv School-° - - --
PROF. SEAN DONAHUE Washington &Lee Univ. Law School (Visiting)-
PROF. JAY M1. FEINMAN Rutgers Law SchoolICanden'o DAVID G. GOLDBERG New York, NY ° PROF. MIIC]IAEL I. GOTTESMAN Georgetown Univ. Law Centera-PROF. RICIIARD J. LAZARUS Georgetowen Univ. Law Center-o
--ena, P
PROF. STEPIIEN A. SALTZI3URG George Washington University Law School'° PROF. ALLAN R. STEIN Rutgers Law School-Caunden'O PROF. JOHN F. VARGO, Indiana University Law School $0 (retired)
PROF. ALVIN S. WEINSTEIN Prof Emnerias, Carnegie-McIlon University'0 PROF. ROBERT F. WILLIAMS Rutgers Law School-Carnden'O FOR IDENTiFncATON ONVLY
° NOTADMITTED INVEU'i'HAPSIIRE September 13, 2005 Jason Zorn, Esq.
Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop 0-15 D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: VY.Uprate - Docket No..50-271 (ASLBPRNo. 04-832-02-OLA)
Dear Jason:
This letter identifies documents on the NRC Staff's September 8, 2005 Deliberative Process Log which DPS believes should have been produced. The documents are the following:
ML052230204 ML052230209 ML052230210
.(QjY 05co I
ML052340101 ML052310075 ML052340089 ML052340108 ML052340239 ML052340258 ML052340262 ML052340251 ML052360320 ML052410318 ML052410385 ML052410296 ML052410379 ML052410310 ML052410383 ML052410391 ML052410316 ML052410395 ML052420358 ML052420371 ML052420376 ML052420384
We believe the scope of the Deliberative Process Privilege is narrow and does not include documents that do not disclose the deliberative process leading to a policy decision by the NRC Staff and does not include facts contained in documents. As best as we can determine, from the limited disclosures made in the Log, none of the documents identified above meet the narrow criteria for application of the Deliberative Process Privilege.
Consistent with my previous discussions with Ms. Poole, I understand that the Staff agrees that the time for filing a motion with the ASLB regarding the failure to produce the identified documents will be extended until a reasonable time following a response to this letter from the Staff. I suggest the time be 5 business days from the date of the response. I also propose the Staff provide its resplonseitobthis'letter request within-the'next two weeks. Since technically an
~----
"agreement" between us as to a filing deadline set by the Regulations is ineffective, I propose we agree that I may advise the ASLB of our agreement and that the Staff will not oppose any motion with regard to these documents that we file based on timeliness.
Thank you for consideration of our request.
Sincerely, cc: Sara Hofmann, Esq.
14 SEPEA Jason Zorn, Esq.
Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop 0-15 D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
- . i
~
.ii
)III1fi ll illl II