ML052630056
| ML052630056 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 01/08/2004 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2002-A-0113 | |
| Download: ML052630056 (2) | |
Text
p -
g:\\alleg\\panel\\20020 13arb7.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0113 Site/Facility: Salem & Hope Creek ARB Date:
1/8/04 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Acknowledged: Yes Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: The alleger was originally concerned with his ability to perform duties in accordance with the Transient Assessment Response Plan (TARP) team formation procedure. When contacted by 01 he chose not be interviewed and stated that he would try to resolve his concerns within the PSEG corrective action process. The NRC issued a conditional closeout letter to the alleger stating that the NRC will consider this allegation closed unless he contacts us within 30 days of the date of the letter. He did contact NRC in a November 20, 2002, letter and stated that he wanted the NRC to keep the issue open.
In a telephone cat! and subsequent letter dated 12120/02, the alleger wanted the NRC to pursue his H&l claim and wanted to address the TARP issue.
DRP reviewed a 2119/03 01 transcript (previously completed) and the final 01 Report (01 Case no.1-2003-010) and did not identify any new technical issues. In their final report, 01 did not substantiate that H&l took place.
In a 912/03 information package, the alleger indicated that PSEG is showing a continuing pattern of discrimination since he/she is taking medication that precludes him/her from being on the TARP team (Medical Department at PSEG is aware) but yet the individual received an unsatisfactory mid-year performance appraisal on 8128/03.
01 completed their final review of the alleger's discrimination case ((1 -2003-01 OS) and did not find sufficient evidence to prove that discrimination occurred.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Blouph Branch Chief (AOC) - Meyer SAC - Vito 01 Rep. - Wilson. Neff. Teator RI Counsel - Farrar Others - Barber. Holody. Eichenholz DISPOSITION ACTIONS:
- 1)
DRP completed review of the final discrimination case (1-2003-010S) and did not identify any new technical issues.
Responsible Person:
Barber Closure Documentation:
ECD:
01/08/04 Completed: 01/06/04
- 2) 3 Week OE Memo - Supplemental 01 Investigation 1-2002-01OS Responsible Person:
SAC Closure Documentation:
ECD:
1/16/2004 Completed:
- 3)
Closeout letter to alleger and licensee with 01 summary.
Responsible Person:
SAC Closure Documentation:
ECD:
1/30/2004 Completed:_-
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT:
/~
ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB
2 PRIORITY OF Of INVESTIGATION:
Alleger initially declined to have the NRC pursue his discrimination issue. Thus, the original 01 Case (1-2002-033) was closed since the alleger did not want to be interviewed and agreed no immediate safety issues existed when he was contacted by 0I. In his 12/20 letter, no new technical information was provided to warrant raising 01's priority on this case. Later, he/she requested that 01 pursue H&I. In their final report, 01 did not substantiate that H&l took place.
Regional Counsel made determination that prima facie case has been articulated.