ML052620166

E-mail from R. Urban of USNRC to S. Barber of USNRC, Regarding Inadequate EDG Lockout Relay Testing Frequency

ML052620166
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	04/19/2004
From:	Urban R NRC Region 1
To:	Barber S NRC/RGN-I/DRP/PB6
References
FOIA/PA-2004-0314, IR-03-002
Download: ML052620166 (1)

Text

I-GI-e-n--n-Me-y-e-r---R-e-:-Ih6deq-u-a-te- EDGLO__ck6dt Rela-y Testing F requency d

Page tageU4 1 _

w less-i

[GlenMeyer - Re: Inadequate EDG Lockout From: Richard Urban )

To: Scott Barber Date: 4119104 4:19PM

Subject:

Re: Inadequate EDG Lockout Relay Testing Frequency You're probably right. I guess you guys should convince DRS that they have the lead. I think Pindale was the team leader?

>>> Scott Barber 04/19/04 04:15PM >>>

I believe this allegation came out of a DRS lead December 2002 SSDI at Hope Creek. It seems to me that they should have the lead to close out the finding since they identified the original issue. They need to write it up in a feeder, forward it to us, and we'll put it in a HC IR.

>>> Richard Urban 04/19/04 03:24PM >>>

During a Hope Creek team inspection, AV 50-354/2003-002-01 was opened pending an 01 Investigation.

The 01 case was closed on April 9, 2004, as unsubstantiated. When you take this issue to an allegation panel, keep in mind that you have a technical issue open that needs to be addressed. At the time, I believe DRP, absent any finding of willfulness, was planning on issuing the licensee a cited Green violation. I recollect that the reason for citing vs. normal non-cited green was because they would not put it in their corrective action program or their corrective actions were very slow. This may not be the case at this time, which means it could go out as an NCV Green.

CC: Glenn Meyer; Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray; Raymond Lorson; Stephen Pindale 41

((I