ML052590500
| ML052590500 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 06/03/2004 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2004-A-0070 | |
| Download: ML052590500 (2) | |
Text
I VI I g:\\alleg~panelK200400070arb.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2004-A-0070 Site/Facility: Salem/Hope Creek ARB Date: June 3, 2004 Branch Chief (AOC): Holody Acknowledged: No Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: The alleger noted that the Utilities Service Alliance (USA) performed to evaluate the work environment at Salem and Hope Creek indicated that licensed operators were working a significant amount of undocumented overtime. The alleger asserted that this undocumented overtime could potentially lead to nonconformances with PSEG procedures on the control of overtime. If the overtime abuse was excessive, it could also lead to violations of NRC requirements on the control of overtime.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Blouqh Branch Chief (AOC) - Barber SAC - Vito. Harrison 01 Rep. - Wilson RI Counsel - Farrar Others - Passarelli DISPOSITION ACTIONS:
- 1)
Acknowledgment letter Responsible Person:
Closure Documentati SAC ECD:
6/23/04 Completed:
- 2)
Refer allegation to licensee. DRP to provide words for Enclosure I to referral letter.
Responsible Person:
Holodv Closure Documentation:
ECD:
6/17/04 Completed:
- 3)
Review information from licensee on referred allegation. If acceptable, draft closeout letter to alleger.
Responsible Person:
Holodv Closure Documentation:
ECD:
8/2/04 Completed:
- 4)
If licensee response is acceptable, draft closeout letter to alleger. If not, resolve concerns with PSEG.
Responsible Person:
Holodv Closure Documentation:
ECD:
8/23/04 Completed:
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: The initial safety significance of the issue appears to be low because the overtime issue was documented in an internal licensee assessment (USA) of the PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):
Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress):
('
ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB q
2 ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wronqdoing matters (including discrimination Issues) that are under Investigation by 01. DOL. or DOJ):
What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?_
When did the potential violation occur?_
(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.
NOTES: (Include other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral. if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)