ML052570149
| ML052570149 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 09/24/2002 |
| From: | Johnson S NRC Region 1 |
| To: | Barkley R, Meyer G NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2002-A-0034 | |
| Download: ML052570149 (2) | |
Text
ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0034 Branch Chief (AOC):
Meyer Site/Facility: Salem Acknowledged: Yes No N/A ARB Date: Sept 18, 2002 Confidentiality Granted: Yes No Issue discussed: Allegation had been closed based on PSEG's assurances that the desired radiological data / bioassay information had been sent to the alleger. The alleger claims that he never received the information.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
NA ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees:
Chair - Clifford. DRP Branch Chief(AOC) - Meyer, DRP SAC - Johnson 01 Rep. - Letts. 01 RI Counsel -
Fewell Others -
Crleniak, QRS DISPOSITION ACTIONS: (List actions for processing and closure. Note responsible person(s), form of action closure document(s), and estimated completion dates.)
- 1)
Send letter to the alleger with documentation of certified letter which was received at his home which had the PSEG bioassay information. Avoid sending bioassay information directly to the alleger due to records not being NRC records.
Responsible Person: Meyer ECD:
10/15/02 Closure Documentation:
Completed::
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: Low, based on the previous closeout of the allegation and the purported delivery of the requested bioassay materials to his home.
PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
Low / None lack of specific indication of wrongdoing Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress): NA ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by 01. DOL. or DOJ):
What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?
When did the potential violation occur?._
(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.
NOTES: (Include other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)
ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB
r I
Sharon Johnson - RI-2002-A-0034 (Closed)
Page I
From:
Sharon Johnson To:
Glenn Meyer; Richard Barkley Date:
9/24/02 4:25PM
Subject:
RI-2002-A-0034 (Closed)
REMINDER Branch 3 still owes the alleg office a panel form for RI-2002-A-0034 stating the actions discussed at the 9118/02 ARB panel.
I will also mention that the letter from the individual was received by us on August 29, 2002, so the letter back to the alleger addressing his issue MUST be out of here by 9127102.
Thanks Sharon