ML052570090
| ML052570090 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 03/11/2003 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2002-A-0113 | |
| Download: ML052570090 (1) | |
Text
g:\\alleg\\panel\\20020113arb4.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0113 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem & Hope Creek Acknowledged: Yes ARB Date:
3/11/2003 Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: The alleger was originally concerned with his ability to perform duties in accordance with the Transient Assessment Response Plan (TARP) team formation procedure.
When contacted by 01 he chose not be interviewed and stated that he would try to resolve his concerns within the PSEG corrective action process. The NRC issued a conditional closeout letter to the alleger stating that the NRC will consider this allegation closed unless he contacts us within 30 days of the date of the letter. He did contact NRC in a November 20, 2002, letter and stated that he wanted the NRC to keep the issue open.
In a telephone call and subsequent letter dated 12/20/02, the alleger wants the NRC to pursue his H&l claim and address the TARP issue.
DRP reviewed a 2/19103 transcript (01 Case No.1-2003-010) to determine if any new technical issue could be identified.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees:
Chair - Rogge Branch Chief (AOC) - Meyer SAC - Vito O Rep. - Wilson RI Counsel -
Others -
White. McFadden DISPOSITION ACTIONS: (List actions for processing and closure. Note responsible person(s),
form of action closure document(s), and estimated completion dates.)
- 1)
DRP completed review of the 2/19/03 transcript and did not identify any new technical issues.
Responsible Person: Barber/Meyer ECD:
Closure Documentation:
Completed: 3/11/03 SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT:
PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
Alleger initially declined to have the NRC pursue his discrimination issue. Thus, 01 Case 1-2002-033 was closed since the alleger agreed no immediate safety issues existed when he was contacted by 01. During this initial contact, he told 01 he did not want to be interviewed. In his 12/20 letter, no new technical information was provided to warrant raising 01's priority on this case.
NOTES:
(Include other pertinent comments.
Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropdriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)