ML052550337
| ML052550337 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 01/08/2003 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2002-A-0132 | |
| Download: ML052550337 (2) | |
Text
G:UALLEGIPANELl2OO2O132arb3.wpdALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0132 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem/HC Acknowledged: Yes ARB Date:
01/08103 Confidentiality Granted: No
/ _
Issue discussed: The alleger raised five issues in theaiiii T
wlhese issue s w er 1618Etera
- >uar an independent investigaio ear t revi these assertions. The team's report made findings and conclusions in the same areas delineated in the original allegation, and PSEG and responded to their findings and conclusions as documented in a December 19, 2002, letter.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Rogae Branch Chief (AOC) - Barber (ActQ BC) SAC - Vito 01 Rep. - Monroe. Rzenka RI Counsel - Fewell Others - Lanninc. Caron, Frechette, Meyer DISPOSITION ACTIONS: (List actions for processing and closure. Note responsible person(s), form of action closure document(s), and estimated completion dates.)
- 1)
Preliminary discussions between DRP and DRS have indicated that questions exist regarding the appropriateness of PSEG responses to address the underlying technical issues highlighted in this allegation. We need to continue the dialogue between the divisions and develop a regional response to address the scope of PSEG's proposed corrective actions for these issues.
Responsible Person:
Meyer/White ECD:
.02/12/03 Closure Documentation:
Completed:
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: This issue is of moderate significance since aspects of PSEG's response to the alleged concerns do fully resolve the concerns. The degree to which they do not resolve these concerns is the subject of further discussion between DRP and DRS.
PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):
Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress):
ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by 01, DOL, or DOJ):
What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?_
When did the potential violation occur?_
(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.
Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of Informaton ct. eXem tP-VIA AKt MI*NUJES ARREVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB
/6°
2 NOTES: (Include other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)