ML052440476
| ML052440476 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 09/04/2002 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0191 RI-2002-A-0113 | |
| Download: ML052440476 (2) | |
Text
Mac oms-2OO2O6 1 3 a rb6p-d--
Pagde It I
g:\\alleg\\panel\\20020113arb.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-01 13 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem/l-Hope Creek Acknowledged: No ARB Date:
9104/2002 Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: Potential violation of 50.7, Employee Protection, in that the alleger was discriminated against for raising a concern through the corrective action process.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
N/A ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Clifford Branch Chief (AOCI - Meyer SAC - Vito 01 Rep. -
Letts RI Counsel -
Fewell Others - Crleniak, Barkley DISPOSITION ACTIONS: (List actions for processing and closure. Note responsible persons),
form of action closure documentsl and estimated completion dates.)
- 1)
Acknowledgment letter to the alleger along withi&OL rights.
7 C.
Responsible Person:
SAC.
ECD:
9122/2002 Closure Documentation:
Completed:_
- 2)
Regional Counsel determined Responsible Person:
Fewell ECD:
Closure Documentation:
Completed: 9/4/02
- 3) 01 to open up a case (1-2002-033) and interview the alleger to gather additional information regarding the discriminati" that the Individual was subjected to as well as the nature of the protected activit as engaged in.
7 c_
Responsible Person:
Letts ECD:
TBD Closure Documentation:
Completed:
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSM ENT: The risk significance of this concern appears low to moderate as it is unclear whether the individual was engaged in a protected activity and whether the alleged discrimination actually constituted a clear violation of CFZO.7 (i position or compensation were not Impacted by the temporary suspension of badge, but the action alone could be considered adverse).
U PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
Medium If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here le.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):
Request that 01 interview the alleger to obtain additional Information to determine whether It Is prudent to continue with an Investigation In this case.
Information in this record was deleted in accordance witb~he Freedomrof Infornation Act, exemptiorn DECO R
~FOWHt
MarXcy.I
- ui
_a.
IMar~cy.lolntes - zuOZ01 I 3arr.wpaj P~age Z 2
Rationale used to defer Of discrimination case (DOL case in progress):
No Indication that the Individual has filed with DOL at this time.
ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION fonly applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by 0!, DOL, or DOJI:
What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?_
When did the potential violation occur?_
{Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.
NOTES: (Include other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)
I.