ML052440462
| ML052440462 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 09/22/2003 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 1-2003-010S, FOIA/PA-2004-0191 RI-2002-A-0113 | |
| Download: ML052440462 (2) | |
Text
S EXHIBIT 3 information in this record was deleted In accordance with 1Te Freedqof m
4rmation Act, exemrtions ____A__-__
FORA _-
0 IC Iiie Exhibit 3 Case No. 1-2003-O1OS
est WAlson-2002011 3arb6.wpd Page 1 71 Jo 0703 5
/
g:\\alleg\\panei\\2002011 3arb6.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-01 13 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem & Hope Creek Acknowledged: Yes ARB Date: 9/22103 Confidentiality Granted: No Issua discussed: The alleger was originally concerned with
- ability to perform duties In accordance with the Transient Assessment Response Plan ITARP) team f rmation procedure. When contacted by O'hose not be Interviewed and stated thati*would try to resolv&eIoncerns within the PSEG corrective action process. The NRC issued a conditional closeout letter to the alleger statin that the NRC will consider this allegation closed unles ~ontacts us within 30 days of the date of the letter.W)id contact NRC In a November 20, 2002, letter and state'tha wanted the NRC to keep the issue open.
In a telephone call and subsequent letter dated 12/20102, the alleger wanted the NRC to pursue4-*p&l claim and wanted to address the TARP Issue.
DRP reviewed a 2/19103 01 transcript (previously completed) and the final 01 Report 101 Case no.1-2003-010) and did not Identify any new technical Issues. In their final report. 01 did not substantiate that H&l took place.
In a 9/2/3 Information package, the alleger Indicated that PSEG Is showing a continuing pattern of discrimination since he/she Is taking medication that precludes him/her from being on the TARP team (Medical Department at PSEG Is aware) but yet the Individual received an unsatlsfactory mid-year performance appraisal on 8)28/03.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Blough Branch Chief (AOCQ - Meyer SAC - Vito, Ijarrison 01 Rep. - Wilson RI Counsel -
Farrar Others -
DISPOSITION ACTIONS:
11 DRP completed review of the 9/3/03 information package and did not identify any new technical issues.
Responsible Person:
Barber ECD:
09/22/03 Closure Documentation:
Completed: 09/11/03 21 O to review the 9/3/03 information package to determine if the unsatisfactory mid-year performance appraisal related to his/her engagement in protected activities.
Responsible Person:
01 ECD:
Closure Documentation:_
Completed:
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: Potential H&I. The risk significance of this concern appears low since the alleger's concern involvde abilty to function as an effective member of a TARP team andft is currently not assigne to a TARP team.
PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
Normal Alleger initially declined to have the NRC pursueidiscrimination Issue. Thus, the original 01 Case (1-2002-033) was closed since the alleger did not want to be interviewed and agreed no immediate safety Issues existed whespvas contacted by 01. InG)12120 letter, no new technical information was provided to warrant raising 01's priority on this case. Later, he/she requested that 01 pursue H&l. In thelrfinal report, 01 did not substantiate that H&l took place.
Regional Counsel mad cnt I - -EXHIBIT 3
1-o3OO~
~?Prr
.' cFr PAC~ 6 1-
' ~-hE