ML052440451
| ML052440451 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 03/11/2003 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 1-2003-010, FOIA/PA-2004-0191 RI-2002-A-0113 | |
| Download: ML052440451 (2) | |
Text
g:kalleg\\panel\\200201 13arb4.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0113 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem & Hope Creek Acknowledged: Yes ARB Date:
3/11/2003 Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: The alleger was originally concerned Withbility to perform duties in accordance with the Transient Assessment Response Plan (TARP) team formation procedure.
When contacted by OL110hose not be interviewed and stated thatWNould try to resolve'l concerns within the PSEG corrective action process. The NRC issued a conditional closeout letter to the alleger stating that the NRC will consider this allegation closed unlessft contacts us within 30 days of the date of the letter. *6%did contact NRC in a November 20, 2002, letter and stated thatJ~y anted the NRC to keep the issue open.
In a telephone call and subsequent letter dated 12/20/02, the alleger wants the NRC to pursue H&l claim and wants to address the TARP is DRP reviewed a 2/19/03 transcript 101 Case 0.1-2003-010) to determine if any new technical issue could be identified.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS r'.
Attendees:
Chair - Rogge Branch Chief (AOC) - Meyer SAC - Vito 01 Rep. - Wilson RI Counsel -
Others -
DISPOSITION ACTIONS: (list actions for processing and closure. Note responsible person(s).
form of action closure documents), and estimated completion dates.)
1 )
DRP completed review of the 2/19/03 transcript and did not identify any new technical issues.
Responsible Person:
Meyer ECD:
Closure Documentation:
Completed: 3111/03 SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: Potential H&I. The risk significance of this concern appears low since the alleger's concern Involves his ability to function as an effective member of a TARP team and he is currently not assigned to a TARP team.
PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
Normal Alleger Initially declined to have the NRC pursue*Yiscrimination Issue. Thus, 01 Case 1-2002-033 was closed since the alleger agreed no immediate safety issues existed when#
was contacted by 01. During this initial contactftold 0110did not want to be interviewed.
IlnV2120 letter, no new technical information Was provider to warrant raising Ol's priority on thi case.
NOTES: (Include other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Regional Counsel made A i
l
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)