ML052420507

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
03-2005-DRAFT-Written Exam Comments
ML052420507
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  
Issue date: 03/28/2005
From:
Operations Branch IV
To:
TXU Power
References
50-445/05-301, 50-446/05-301, CP-03-2005, ES-401, ES-401-9, NUREG-1021, Draft Rev 9 50-445/05-301, 50-446/05-301
Download: ML052420507 (9)


Text

ES-401 CP-03-2005 Written Examination Form ES-401-9 Review Worksheet

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 1 H 2 X X - U (S) Definitely A and possibly D are not credible; this question can be answered by logic rather than knowledge of the plant.-wrote a new question 2B H 3 - S 3 H 3 X X X U (S) reword stem question to what major factor could require a more rapid cooldown than EOS-0.2A allows? and try changing B to decreasing subcooling margin; this may be an SRO-level question -changed distractors and stem 4B H 3 X - U (S) A and C are weak distractors because the stem points to the Letdown system as the problem and indicates no abnormalities in the RCP Seal system. - changed two distractors 5 H 3 X - U (S) not sure D is credible; - changed D distractor 6 H 3 X - U (S) A and D do not make sense (any leakage into containment ... would be into containment) and D is not credible; reword all 4 distractors; is the first sentence of the stem really necessary? -

removed first sentence of stem, modified distractors 7 H 3 - E (S) what does failed as is mean in the stem? -elaborated on failed as is 8 H 3 X U (S) use the same valve in both C and D; put blanks next to 4, 5, and 6 in the stem and number the three steps in each distractor; doesnt test the knowledge of the REASONS for Emerg. Bor. for ATWS per KA; - changed question stem and 4 selections as commented Instructions

[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]

1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:

@ The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

@ The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

@ The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

@ One or more distractors is (are) not credible.

@ One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).

4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

@ The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content).

@ The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).

@ The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

@ The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-only (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
6. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
7. At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

33 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 9 H 3 X - U (S) A, C, and possibly D could be considered correct (although the meaning of D is unclear);

replace bad with ruptured and good with non-ruptured; - replaced bad/good with ruptured/non-ruptured. Also created new distractors, modified others.

10 H 3 - E (S) what is the S/G compartment room? Eliminate stem sentence with In the ERGs, ...; number the two answers in each stem and separate them by semi-colons; change stem question to read ...

and the minimum indicated level to be considered intact in the ERG would be__.; change distractors to read either 5% or 26% as needed; - modified stem for use with semicolons (Mark preference), modified stem content to elaborate on selection of normal/adverse containment values (bracket/no bracket) 11 H 2 X - U (S) A and B are not credible since they both include mutually exclusive actions (replace 1" with 8" in both); - replaced as requested.

12B H 2 - E (S) cannot find the reference to support this answer; - reference found, verified.

13 H 3 - E (S) change stem to what is the condition of the TDAFW flow control valve controls in the control room? and change A, C, and D to ...are lost but control may be recovered by... and eliminate no actions required from B; modified stem and distractors as requested.

14B H 3 X U (S) Doesnt test REASONS for EOP ACTIONS for loss of vital AC bus per KA; - found new bank question, F for LOK 15B H 2 - U (S) Also, D is not a component; need to see the parent in order to verify that this is a legitimate modified question; - removed word component from stem, changed to bank from modified (modified criteria not met) 16B F 2 X X - X U (S) procedure selection is specifically SRO-level (55.43.5); picking the correct procedure to blow down a SSW strainer is not a test-worthy topic; D is not credible; - wrote new question 17B H 3 - X U (S) procedure selection is specifically SRO-level (55.43.5); rewrote stem such that question is asking for EOP entry conditions, specific to RO knowledge.

18B H 3 X X - U (S) C doesnt make sense; A is not credible; delete most likely from stem

- changed stem and modified distractors.

19B H 4 - S INPO Cook-1 5/21/2001; 20B F 3 X - E (S) how did the switch fail? - elaborated on switch failure 21 H 3 X U (S) doesnt test the REASONS for start-up termination on loss of SRNI per KA; use consistent nomenclature for NIs (NI-31 or -31); - modified question to meet KA intent, used consistent nomenclature.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 22 H 3 X X X X U (S) distractors dont make sense and there is no correct answer; doesnt test the REASONS for EOP guidance on loss of IRNI per KA; -modified stem and distractors to include reasons for EOP guidance and make more sense.

23 H 4 X - U (S) TSB reference is incorrect; the FSAR seems to indicate that subcriticality can be maintained without boron, but the TSB (3.7.16) indicates that a minimum amount of boron is required; what is the basis for assuming that some rad alarms will come in rather than none? - wrote new question 24 F 4 X - X U (S) knowledge of TS LCO required actions is SRO-level (55.43.2); there is no distinction in the TS between personnel and emergency air locks and no distinction between electrical and mechanical interlocks; -modified stem and removed TS/1 hr aspects 34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 25 H 3 - S wrote new question per previous comments on K/A match.

26 H 3 - X U (S) procedure selection is SRO-level (55.43.5); would an RO be expected to know the various legs of the CSFST by memory (with no reference)? -

wrote new question.

27 H 3 X - U (S) correct answer needs to be reworded to more clearly agree with basis on page 24 of FRP-0.1A; C and D do not seem credible; - reworded stem and changed two distractors.

28 H 3 X - X U (S) procedure selection is SRO-level (55.43.5); distractors dont seem to correspond to stem question; -modified stem.

29 H 3 X X U (S) add a 1" and 2" to each part of each distractor; doesnt test knowledge of LOSS or MALFUNCTION of demin. for CVCS per KA; - changed format of question, demin malfunction verified with utlity: where boron is changed by more than 10ppm this is a malfunction (ie operator induced, but still a malfunction) 30 H 3 - S 31 F 3 - E (S) change C from Normal: 2-EB4-2" to Normal: 2-EB3-2"; - changed as recommended.

32M H 3 X X U (S) change the Unit Supervisor would: to the required actions are:; procedure selection is SRO-level (55.43.5); doesnt really point towards ECCS per KA; cannot tell if this is truly modified without parent; - modified stem, and showed Mark parent question, agreed it is modified.

33 H 2 - S 34B H 3 - S 35B H 3 - S 36B H 4 - S 37B H 3 - E (S) delete the first sentence of the stem; cannot tell if this is truly modified without parent; deleted first sentence as requested, changed to bank.

38M H 3 - X U (S) this sounds like SRO-level (55.43.2); - wrote new question.

39 F 3 - E (S) delete the first sentence of the stem; - as requested.

40B H 3 - S 41B H 3 X X U (S) I dont think B is correct; doesnt test knowledge of effects of loss of CCS on instrument readings per KA; - modified stem to include CCS, answer is correct, verified with utility.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 42B H 3 X X U (S) change AS to As in stem; this is SRO-only (55.43.5); doesnt test knowledge of EOP TERMS and DEFINITIONS related to CS per KA; -

wrote a new question.

34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 43B H 3 - S 44 H 3 - S 45 H 3 - S 46B H 1 X - U (S) too easy because A, B, and C do not seem credible; - found new bank question.

47B F 3 - E (S) change stem to ...following a reactor trip from 102% power:; - changed as requested.

48B H 3 - S 49 H 3 - S 50 F 2 - E (S) add only to C; - changed as requested.

51 F 2 - S 52B H 2 - S 53B F 3 - S 54 F 3 X - U (S) stem is misleading by implying that there is a breaker to check when there isnt; -modified stem and selections.

55B F 3 X - U (S) B and D are the same and cannot both be valid distractors; -changed all four selections 56 F* 3 - E (S) I disagree with the authors LOK; - changed LOK to F.

57 H 3 X U (S) doesnt test ability to monitor AUTOMATIC operations of the leakage detection system per KA; - wrote new question.

58B H 3 - S 59 H 2 -  ?(S) not sure the answer is correct; fix symmetry with distractors; -modified answer and corrected symmetry as requested 60 H 3 X - U (S) A doesnt address the question; -changed distractor A.

61 H 2 X - U (S) C and D are not credible since the procedures dont exist; - replaced with valid procedures.

62B F 3 X X U (S) this sounds like SRO-level (55.43.2); should they know this by memory?

Doesnt test knowledge of DESIGN FEATURES/INTERLOCKS per KA; -

wrote new question.

34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 63 H 3 - S 64B F 2 X U (S) doesnt test ability to LOCATE/OPERATE components per KA; - wrote new question.

65 F 3 - E (S) change stem to ...at CPSES and an alarm...; - changed as requested 66 F 2 - S 67B F 3 - E (S) cannot verify this is a true modified question without the parent;-

changed to bank.

68B H 3 - S 69 F 3 - E (S) change stem to ...than Unit 1 because it gives_____; - changed as requested 70 H 3 - E (S) change stem to ...Select all the items below... - changed as requested 71B F 3 - S 72 H 3 - E (S) change stem to 98mrem/hr and answer will be B; changed stem to 96mr/hr, and kept correct answer A as written.

73 F* 3 - E (S) I disagree with the authors LOK; delete first sentence of stem; -

changed LOK and deleted first sentence as requested.

74M F 3 - S 75 H 3 X X U (S) procedure selection is SRO-level (55.43.5); doesnt test ability to PERFORM IMMEDIATE ACTIONS w/o reference per KA; -changed K/A because couldnt write question on the topic and replaced with new bank question for new K/A.

76 H 3 X X U (S) RO-level (55.41.7/8); what is the difference between A and B? Doesnt test ability to determine SIGNIFICANCE of CCP operation; 77 H 4 X X U (S) RO-level (55.41.3-8); doesnt test ability to determine ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN if PZR pressure instrument fails low per KA; - wrote new question.

78 H 3 - X U (S) drop a necessary from the stem; RO-level (55.41.10); - wrote new question.

79 H 2 - - E (S) mention the procedure selection in all 4 distractors; - changed distractors.

80 H 3 - X U (S) RO-level (55.41.5-8); - wrote new question.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 81 F 3 - X U (S) RO-level (55.41.7/8); - wrote new question, new K/A.

82B H 3 - - S 34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 83 H 3 X - - E (S) any handouts? This shouldnt be from memory, but it may be just a look-up if the reference is provided; - - utility approved as written.

84 F 3 - X U (S) RO-level (55.41.10); - wrote new question.

85 H 3 X - - U (S) D is not credible; - wrote new distractor D.

86 H 1 - - E (S) should RCP Trip/Malfunction be in quotes for A and C? - modified question.

87B H 3 - - E (S) fix typo in stem; - fixed typo.

88 H 3 X X - - U (S) unless MTC is currently positive, only one action is required; both A and C are correct (page 504 or TSB); -- changed wording so more clear, however A and C are not both correct.

89 H 3 X - X U (S) D should not be bolded; stem is unclear (what is the difference between initial load shedding and further load shedding?); not sure any of the distractors are really correct (page 33 of reference); RO-level (55.41.10); - wrote new question, changed K/A.

90 H 3 - - S 91 H 3 X - - U (S) D is not credible with fictitious title; - wrote new question, changed K/A.

92 H 3 X - - U (S) C and D not credible with fictitious titles; - fixed question and outline.

93 H 3 - X U (S) RO-level (55.41.10); establish distractor symmetry with STA-612 and goes up for B; - wrote new question.

94 H 3 - - E (S) use CET vice TC in stem; - changed to CET.

95 H 3 - - S 96 H 4 - - E (S) does a reference need to be provided? -no reference per utility.

97 F 4 - - E (S) delete first sentence of stem; - done.

98 F 4 - - E (S) reword stem to delete the first two sentences; - modified stem.

99B H 3 - - S 100B F 2 X X - U (S) A is not credible; doesnt test knowledge of E-PLAN PARS per KA; --

new K/A and question.

34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9