ML052370433

CGS - Init Exam - 06/2005 - Public Forms, Columbia Generating Station

ML052370433
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	05/26/2005
From:	Gody A Operations Branch IV
To:	Parrish J Energy Northwest
References
50-397/05-301, NUREG-1021, Rev 9 50-397/05-301
Download: ML052370433 (9)

Text

EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 9, ES Forms 201-1 and 501-1 CHIEF: I Mark S. Haire I FACILITY: I CGS I DATE of OPERATING EXAM:I 05/26/05 11/27/04 I

Corporate Notification Letter (ES-201 Att-3) Sent (C.2.d) 1

\ \ d / 5~

- I 1/26/05 I Exam Ref. Material Due (if NRC authored) (C.1.d; C.3.c) I hl /A I I 1/26/05 Integrated Exam Outlines Due (C.l .d & e; C.3.d) 2/9/05 Outlines Review & Feedback from NRC (c.2.h; C.3.e) 2/25/05 I Expectations, Issues, & Standards Discussed w/ BC I I I 1 Att-4) and List of Applicants (ES-201-4) Prepared (C.2.1) 5/19/05 Proctor Rules Review w/Fac. & Written Authorized (C.3.k) IO h h S I &-

5119/05 Exam Material to Exam Team (C.3.i)

.d&WXY %* Facility Graded Exam & Comments Received

--WtSRE k-~ I NRC Written Exam Grading Completed I

-.6,&#& 8- Examiners Document Exam Grades on ES Forms 6/67/05 6/20/05 NRC Chief Examiner Grading Review Completed r

6/21/05 NRC BC Review Completed ~~~~~~~~ 4 6/26/05 RPSIIP # Examinees Updated Before Report Issued

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination:

Initials Item Task Description a I b

• I c #

1.

W R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all WA categories are appropriately sampled.

I

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

c c

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

2. I a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number I l l of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

I M

U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L

A T

0 R

3. a. VeriQ that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain@)the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetitionfrom the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test@)

(4) the number of new or modrfied tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specrfed on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

j specified on Form ES-301-1:

cified on the form 55.41143and 55.45sampling is appropriate.

A R

a Author b Facility Reviewer (*)

c NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d NRC Supervisor Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-201, Page 25 of 27

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Initial Item Description a b*

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

2. a. NRC WAS are referenced for all questions.

b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401

5. Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

-/the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed

-the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started

-the examinations were developed independently

-/the licensee certifies that there is no duplication other (explain)

I I I

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent

8. Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9. Question content conforms with specific WA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

Date

a. Author b Facility Reviewer (*I

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:

• The facility reviewer's initialslsignatureare not applicable for NRCdeveloped examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401, Page 29 of 33

ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: & 1" yM b 1 ct Date of Exam: ~ / ~ ~ ~ o g - ' E x a Level:

m RO- ' SROX Initials

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 &2% overall and 70 or 80, as

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed bv half or more of the amlicants l Printed Name/Signat ure Date

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

v

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Level: R O K SRO, Initials Item DescriDtion

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are iustified

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NameBignature Date

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

l i d ui,a u i ,a Y O Y O K I !XI crc b C ui ui Y Y K U a a 2 z W" w" 2I n:

a I

!L U

LL K

Q E

F a 2 N

Ecn fQ 0

7 7 0 0 m m In In 0 0 0 0 N N b b a Q) m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 In m 0 0 K K

.-0

.Id c

0 m m 65 5 h(

Lf!

m 0

f A

Y a

If L

ci, w

S

+

S 0 .-0

.c1 m m C .-C E E (P

m X

K Y w

+

L E v) 0 P,

r 6i

ci, w

S S 0

.-*0 P m

m .-S

.- 5 E

E Q Q

X x

Lf.' Lf.'

a E v) 0 Q

c.i