ML052300418

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Quarterly Remedial Action Progress Report (Rapr) Providing a Summary of Groundwater Remediation Activities Conducted Since the Submission of the Previous Rapr in May 2005 at the PSEG Nuclear, LLC Salem Generating Station (the Station)
ML052300418
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 08/31/2005
From: Pantazes J
ARCADIS
To: Tosch K
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, State of NJ, Dept of Environmental Protection, State of NJ, Dept of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Nuclear Engineering
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0209, PTS05015
Download: ML052300418 (36)


Text

Quarterly Remedial Action Progress Report Second Quarter 2005 PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station August 2005

. ARCADIS Infrastructure, environment, buildings

Environment, Health, and Safety 130 Money Island Road, Salem, NJ 08079 0 PSEG Services Corporation CERTIFIED MAIL August 9, 2005 PTS0501 5 Kent Tosch Manager New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Radiation Protection Programs Bureau of Nuclear Engineering 33 Arctic Parkway Trenton, New Jersey 08625

Dear-Mr.-Tosch:

QUARTERLY REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRESS REPORT, SECOND QUARTER 2005 PSEG NUCLEAR, LLC, SALEM GENERATING STATION PSEG Services Corporation (PSEG) has prepared this Quarterly Remedial Action Progress Report (RAPR) to provide a summary of groundwater remediation activities conducted since the submission of the previous RAPR in May 2005 at the PSEG Nuclear, LLC Salem Generating Station (the Station). The Station is located on Artificial Island in Hancock's Bridge, Salem County, New Jersey. The Station location and layout are presented on Figures 1 and 2, respectively. Groundwater remediation activities are being conducted to address tritium detected in shallow groundwater adjacent to and south of Salem Unit 1.

Project Background In April 2004, a Remedial Investigation Report (RIR) was submitted to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Nuclear Engineering (NJDEP-BNE) presenting the details and results of groundwater investigation activities that were conducted following the discovery of tritium in groundwater adjacent to Salem Unit 1.

The results of the remedial investigation indicated that the source of tritium detected in groundwater was the Spent Fuel Pool, the tritium release to the environment has been stopped, and that tritium has not migrated to the property boundary above the New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criterion (GWQC) for tritium.

KJ -

Mr. Kent Tosch 2 August 9, 2005 The remedial investigation produced a comprehensive body of knowledge that was E-) used as the basis for developing a remedial action strategy designed to hydraulically contain the further migration of tritium in groundwater and to reduce the concentration of tritium in groundwater. In July 2004, a Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP) was prepared and submitted to the NJDEP-BNE presenting the proposed remedial action for achieving these objectives. The RAWP, which proposed the operation of a groundwater extraction system, was approved by the NJDEP in November 2004. In April 2004, prior to the submittal of the RAWP, PSEG conducted a groundwater extraction pilot study designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of groundwater extraction for achieving the remedial objectives. The pilot study proved to be effective and a full-scale groundwater extraction system was subsequently installed.

The following sections present the details and results of activities conducted since the submittal of the May 2005 RAPR, document the progress of remedial actions conducted to date, and provide a discussion of upcoming activities projected for the next reporting period.

Continued Groundwater Monitoring Groundwater monitoring activities consist of the periodic collection of groundwater samples from the 36 Station monitoring wells. A summary of the Station-mdon-itdlrnTWellI details are included in Table I and their locations are presented on Figure 2. Pursuant to the schedule presented in the previous RAPR and subsequent conversations with the NJDEP, the monitoring wells are sampled according to an adaptively managed schedule whereby wells that have been established to have tritium levels that do not exceed ambient levels (including the Vincentown Wells) are sampled semi-annually, wells screened within the shallow water bearing unit but located such that tritium would not be reasonably expected to migrate to them are monitored on a quarterly basis; and, wells that monitor groundwater quality within the groundwater extraction zone and at the property boundary are monitored on a monthly basis. Groundwater monitoring at Well AQ, which was installed within a cofferdam cell, has ceased. Additionally Wells AP and Z have been sampled at a temporarily increased frequency (biweekly) to facilitate further evaluation of the increased concentrations of tritium observed in groundwater samples collected from the AP well in February 2005. The sampling program is designed to ensure representative data are collected that meet the objectives of the investigation and provide the information necessary to evaluate plume migration and capture.

Groundwater samples are submitted to Salem Chemistry for analysis and samples indicating tritium concentrations less than 20,000 picocuries per liter (pCiIL) are sent to Maplewood Testing Services for more refined analysis. Historically, groundwater samples were analyzed for tritium, major cations and anions (e.g., sodium and boron),

and gamma-emitting isotopes. Boron monitoring has ceased as was stated in the last RAPR (Q1 2005). The large volume of analytical data collected to date indicates that plant related gamma-emitting isotopes have not been detected in groundwater samples

Mr. Kent Tosch 3 August 9, 2005 collected during the groundwater investigation, and thus have not migrated any tJ significant distance beyond the seismic gap.

An update of analytical results for groundwater samples from the Site monitoring wells through June 2005 are summarized in Table 2 and are presented on Figure 3. Historic analytical results were presented in the RIR and previous RAPRs. Included on Figure 3 are the extent of tritium in groundwater at the completion of the remedial investigation (Baseline Plume), which was completed in April 2004, the extent of tritium in groundwater in December 2004 in the eighth month of the pilot groundwater remediation activities, and the current extent of tritium in groundwater. Based on a review of the three maps, it is apparent that the mass of tritium in groundwater has been reduced by the remedial efforts completed to date. Details regarding these activities are included in this report.

Specific details regarding the analytical results for the groundwater samples are presented in the following sections. The analytical results for the monitoring wells were evaluated based on the water-bearing zone in which the monitoring wells are screened.

The three primary water-bearing units being investigated beneath the Station are: 1) the Vincentown Formation; 2) the shallow, water-bearing unit within the limits of the cofferdam; and, 3) the shallow, water-bearing unit outside of the limits of the cofferdam.

Tritium Analytical Results for the Vincentown Formation Groundwater quality for wells screened in the Vincentown Formation, which consist of Well K, Well L, Well P, Well Q, and Well V, is currently monitored on a quarterly or semi-annual basis. Groundwater samples collected from these wells are analyzed for tritium and gamma-emitting isotopes. Analytical results of groundwater samples collected from Wells P and Q indicate concentrations of tritium below the laboratory detection limits. Tritium has only been detected at a concentration above laboratory detection limits once (July 2004) in groundwater from Well L; however, the tritium concentration was well below the New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria. Analytical results of groundwater samples collected from Wells V and K have never indicated tritium concentrations greater than 402 pCi/L and 1,170 pCi/L, respectively and both are near their respective minima.

Analytical results of groundwater samples collected from the monitoring wells screened in the Vincentown Formation indicate that the release of water from the Spent Fuel Pool has not migrated beyond the shallow water-bearing unit.

Tritium Analytical Results for Wells Installed Within the Limits of the Cofferdam Wells screened in the shallow, water-bearing unit within the limits of the cofferdam consist of Well M, Well N, Well 0, Well R, Well AC, Well AE, Well Al, Well AM, Well AN, and Well AO. As expected, based upon their location relative to the Salem Unit 1

Mr. Kent Tosch 4 August 9, 2005 seismic gap, analytical results of groundwater samples collected from these wells indicate the highest tritium concentrations in groundwater at the Station. Well AC is located directly southeast of the Salem Unit I seismic gap and has indicated tritium concentrations as high as 15,000,000 pCi/L. Analytical results of more recent groundwater samples collected from this well indicate tritium concentrations of approximately 26,300 pCi/L, just slightly above the NJDEP GWQC for tritium. The decrease in tritium concentrations at Well AC is further confirmation that the release of water from the Spent Fuel Pool has been stopped and the operation of the seismic gap drain and the groundwater extraction system (discussed later in the report) are effectively reducing concentrations of tritium in groundwater.

Trend charts of historic tritium concentration for select wells are presented on Figure 4.

Analytical trends for wells screened within this unit exhibiting tritium concentrations above NJDEP GWQC continue to show generally decreasing trends. This provides an indication that tritium concentrations are decreasing within this unit since the elimination of the source through the operation of the Unit-1 seismic gap drain and operation of the groundwater extraction system. As expected, some wells completed within the cofferdam have shown increasing and indefinite trends as a result of the changes to the groundwater flow field caused by the start-up of the full-scale system. It is expected that these trends will stabilize and become decreasing as seen in many of the pumping Tritium Analytical Results for Wells Installed Beyond the Limits of the Cofferdam The wells installed in the shallow, water-bearing unit beyond the limits of the cofferdam are Well S, Well T, Well U, Well W, Well Y, Well Z, Well AA, Well AB, Well AD, Well AF, Well AG (Shallow and Deep), Well AH (Shallow and Deep), Well AJ, Well AL, Well AP, Well AQ, Well AR, Well AS, and Well AT. These wells are screened either just above the clay confining unit that separates the shallow water-bearing unit from the Vincentown Formation, or in the interval indicating the highest tritium concentrations at the time of the Supplemental Investigation completed in August 2003. Note that one anomalous detection occurred in Well T in February which to date has not been repeated. It is believed that this detection is the result of laboratory cross-contamination. Additionally as shown on Figure 4 an increased concentration of tritium was detected in Well AP in March, and confirmed by subsequent samples. PSEG responded by reactivating the mobile groundwater extraction unit to spot remediate the area. This approach has proved effective in decreasing concentrations at Well AP. It is believed that the increased concentrations are a result of the differential pumping rates between the wells near the edge of the cofferdam (Wells S and AD) and the wells closer to the river (Wells AS and AT). The result has been a more southerly groundwater flow direction than had been anticipated. Contingency plans were developed to allow for the connection of Wells AP and W to the system in the event that flow towards the river became an issue of concern. Additionally Well Z has been monitored at an increased frequency during the evaluation of this issue. Table 3 presents the planned monitoring schedule thorough August of 2005.

Mr. Kent Tosch 5 August 9, 2005

\.. The trends for tritium concentrations for wells screened in the shallow, water-bearing unit. indicate that groundwater extraction associated with the groundwater extraction system has demonstrated the ability to achieve the remedial action objectives (i.e.,

reduce the mass of tritium in groundwater). The current distribution of tritium in groundwater (June 2005) is presented on Figure 3, along with the distribution of tritium prior to the initiation of the pilot study (March 2004) and in December 2004 during the eighth month of the pilot study. As shown on Figure 3, the mass of tritium in groundwater has continued to decrease through the operation of the groundwater extraction pilot study system and operation of the full-scale system.

Groundwater Extraction Inaccordance with the RAWP, groundwater extraction activities completed to date consisted of the operation of the pilot-study from April 26, 2004 to February 11, 2005 and operation of the full scale system from February 16, 2005 to present.

Full-Scale System Based on the results of the pilot study, a full-scale system was designed and installed.

The objectives of the full-scale system, are thefoll6oing: 1I)-to-minfrtaiit-hydraulic containment of the tritium plume; and, 2) to reduce tritium concentrations in groundwater.

The present full-scale system consists of the extraction of groundwater from Wells S, AB, AD, AJ, AN, AS and AT. Well AO continues to be secured to prevent interference with diesel fuel oil recovery operations and Well S has been operating intermittently as a result of its low yield. Groundwater extracted from the wells is processed in accordance with the Station's United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) license and plant procedures.

The full scale system is periodically shut down to service the integrators used to monitor system output. Ten such shut downs occurred during this reporting period resulting in less than 15 days of system down time.

Mobile Groundwater Extraction Unit In response to increased concentrations of tritium detected in well AP beginning in March 2005, the Mobile Groundwater Extraction unit was reactivated to recover groundwater from Well AP. The effectiveness of the use of the Mobile Groundwater Extraction Unit was evaluated through increased monitoring of groundwater at this well.

In the event that more frequent pumping is required from Well AP provisions were made in the design of the system to allow Well AP to be connected to the groundwater extraction system.

Mr. Kent Tosch 6 August 9, 2005 Following extraction, groundwater held in the mobile unit is re-circulated for K.) approximately two hours and sampled for characterization. Following characterization, the groundwater is disposed of in accordance with the Station's United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) license and plant procedures. Table 4 presents the details of each mobile system discharge cycle.

Reactivation of the mobile unit was effective in removing the groundwater with elevated concentrations of tritium from Well AP. As of June 21 the concentration had decreased from 106,000 pCi/L (June 6) to 46,400 pCi/L and, as of July 6 the concentration had decreased to below Salem Chemistry's analytical detection limits.

Total System Effluent Data and Evaluation The full scale system became operational on February 16, 2005. The system operated in various configurations as part of the shakedown process for approximately the first month. The full scale system discharges continuously in accordance with the Station's NRC permit allowing the full-scale system to be more effective and efficient than the pilot-scale system. As of June 30, 2005, the full scale system has recovered greater than 1.4 million gallons of groundwater. This is equivalent to an average recovery rate

-of.just-over 10.7_gallons-per minute or nearly 15 times the recharge rate for the extraction area (assumed to be 0.7 gallons per minute). Table 5 presents a summary of the full-scale system discharges through June 30, 2005.

By Water-Level Data and Evaluation Water-level measurements from the extraction and select observation wells have been monitored to demonstrate that the full-scale groundwater extraction system has hydraulically contained the migration of tritium in groundwater. To demonstrate this effectiveness, water levels are periodically collected and evaluated.

Figures 5 presents the groundwater surface contours on March 19, 2004 under static (non-pumping) conditions prior to the start of the pilot study. The groundwater flow under static conditions is in a generally southwesterly direction towards the Delaware River. Figure 6 presents the groundwater surface contours on July 7, 2005 during operation of the full scale groundwater extraction system. From Figure 6 it is apparent that the system is effectively controlling the plume by hydraulically containing the area where elevated tritium in groundwater exists.

Cumulative Curies Removed The various groundwater recovery activities conducted to date have been successful in recovering tritium from groundwater at and down gradient of the Salem Unit-1 seismic gap.

Mr. Kent Tosch 7 August 9, 2005 Full-Scale System As summarized in Table 5, approximately 0.41 curies of tritium have been recovered from the operation of the groundwater extraction full-scale system through June 30, 2005. Figure 7 summarizes the results of the groundwater remediation activities conducted using the well field. As of June 30, 2005 greater than 1.2 curies had been removed by the well field. The effectiveness is emphasized by the decrease and stabilization in system effluent concentrations since the activation of the full scale system in February of 2005. System effluent concentrations are presently around 51,000 pCi/L.

Other Remedial Actions In addition to the operation of the groundwater extraction systems, seismic gap drains in Salem Unit 1 and Unit 2 have been have been used to drain the water from these gaps.

The following sections provide a brief overview of these activities.

Operation of the Seismic Gap Drain

-The-permanent-drains-installed-in-the-Salem-Unit-I-and seismic -gaps -facilitate -the periodic collection and characterization of groundwater accumulating in the seismic gaps. The operation of these gap drains creates an inward gradient towards the gaps facilitating the recovery of water from a low accessibility area. To date, periodic operation of the seismic gap drain in Unit 1 has resulted in the recovery of approximately 23,000 gallons of tritiated water. As summarized in Table 7, the concentrations of tritium in the water recovered in the Unit 1 drain have been significantly higher than those detected in groundwater samples collected from Well AC and Well AM located to the southeast and southwest of the seismic gap, respectively.

The Unit 1 seismic gap drain is effectively containing residual Spent Fuel Pool water in the seismic gap, and will ultimately result in the reduction of tritium concentrations in groundwater adjacent to the seismic gap. As shown on Figure 13, a total of approximately 3.5 curies of tritium has been recovered from the operation of the Unit 1 seismic gap drain through June 30, 2005. Concentrations have become more stable since the activation of the full scale groundwater extraction system and are presently in on the order of 37,000,000 pCi/L, down from a peak of greater than 100,000,000 pCi/L.

Analytical results for water samples collected from the Unit 2 seismic gap drain do not indicate concentrations of constituents that would indicate a similar release occurred from the Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool. As evidenced by the lack of short-lived gamma-emitting isotopes, samples collected from Unit 1 gap drain do not indicate an ongoing or recent release of spent fuel pool water, Unit 2 gap drain water contains no plant gamma activity. Water samples will be obtained from both gap drains on a periodic basis to evaluate the water that has accumulated in the respective seismic gaps, and to provide a backup warning of a potential release of spent fuel pool water, with the primary method still remaining the monitoring of the SFP tell-tale drains.

Mr. Kent Tosch 8 August 9, 2005 Upcoming Activities Activities projected for the Third Quarter of 2005 (July through September) include the following:

  • Refine the procedures and protocols as necessary to adaptively manage the operation and sampling of the full scale groundwater extraction system;
  • Periodic download of data from permanent data-logging pressure transducers installed in 14 wells throughout the area to demonstrate that groundwater extraction is effectively maintaining hydraulic control;
  • Continued groundwater monitoring activities;
  • Update the groundwater monitoring program;
  • Continued operation and evaluation of data obtained through the full-scale groundwater extraction system; and,
  • Submittal of the RAPR for the third quarter of 2005. The RAPR will document the progress of the full-scale groundwater extraction system.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the contents of this report, please do

---not hesitate to contact-me at-(856) .878-6920.- --

Sincerely, yPant Manager-Permitting & Technical Services C Ron Nimitz- NRC NRC - Salem Resident Inspector NRC - Document Room

C; C I o`2 ARCADIS Table 01. Well Construction Details, PSEG Nuclear, ILC, Salem Generating Station, Hancock's Bridge, New Jersey.

Installation Construction Diameter Total Depth Monitoring Monitored MP MP Northing Easting Well ID Date Details (inches) (feet bgs) Interval Hydrogeologic Elevation Elevation (NAD 83) (NAD 83)

(feet bgs) Unit (feet RPD) (feet amsl)

Well K Feb-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 80.0 70.0 - 80.0 Vincentown' 102.00 12.08 231,435 199,697 Well L Jan-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 80.0 70.0 - 80.0 Vincentown1 101.46 11.54 230,933 199,263 Well M May-03 Sch-40 PVC 1 20.0 10.0 - 20.0 Cofferdam2 102.17 12.25 230,843 199,546 Well N Jan-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 20.0 10.0 - 20.0 Cofferdam 2 101.65 11.73 230,777 199,661 Well 0 Jan-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 20.0 10.0 - 20.0 Cofferdam 2 101.33 11.41 230,804 199,839 Well P Mar-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 80.0 70.0 - 80.0 Vinceniowni 101.13 11.21 230,336 200,000 Well Q Mar-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 80.0 70.0- 80.0 Vincentown' 106.59 16.67 230,645 201,196 Well R Jun-03 Sch-40 PVC 1 19.0 9.0 - 19.0 Cofferdam 2 102.35 12.43 230,906 199,640 Well S May-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 34.7 24.7 -34.7 Shallow 99.04 9.12 230,711 199,613 Well T Jun-03 Sch4O PVC 2 31.2 21.2 -31.2 Shallow' 104.13 14.21 231,575 199,575 Well U4 May-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 32.2 27.2 -32.2 Shallow3 98.57 8.65 231,370 199,618 Well V4 Jun-03 Sch40 PVC 2 79.5 69.5 -79.5 Vinceniown' 98.74 8.82 231,355 199,548 Well W4 Jun-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 35.0 25.0 - 35.0 Shallow 98.26 8.34 230,777 199,450 Well Y Sep-03 Sch40 PVC 2 37.0 27.0 -35.0 Shallw 3 101.81 11.89 230,771 199,343 Well Z Sep-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 37.5 27.5 -37.5 Shallow 3 101.86 11.94 230,681 199,399 Well AA4 Sep-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 36.0 26.0 -36.0 Shallow 99.07 9.15 230,603 199,541 Well AB4 Oct-03 Sch-40 PVC 2 42.0 32.0- 42.0 Shallow3 98.93 9.01 230,623 199,677 Well AC4 Sep-03 Sch40 PVC 2 24.0 14.0 -24.0 Cofferdam 2 98.77 8.85 230.724 199,725 Notes:

MP Measuring Point bgs Below ground surface RPD Relative to plant datum amsl Relative to mean sea level (NAVD 1988) 1 Monitoring well is screened inthe Vincentown Formation.

2 Monitoring well is screened inthe shallow, water-bearing unit at a location within the limits of the cofferdam.

3 Monitoring well is screened inthe shallow, water-bearing unit at a location outside the limits of the cofferdam.

4 The surface completions of Monitoring Wells S, U,V, W, AA, AB, AC, and AD were converted from above-grade to flush-grade in February 2004.

C C 2of2 ARCADIS Table 01. Well Construction Details, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station, Hancock's Bridge, New Jersey.

Installation Construction Diameter Total Depth Monitoring Monitored MP MP Northing Easting Well ID Date Details (inches)' (feet bgs) Interval Hydrogeologic Elevation Elevation (NAD 83) (NAD 83)

(feet bgs) Unit (feet RPD) (feet amsl) 3 Well AD' Oct-03 Sch40 PVC 6 43.0 33.0 - 43.0 Shallow3 98.99 9.07 230,684 199,607 Well AE Oct-03 Sch40 PVC 2 37.5 27.5 - 37.5 Cofferdam2 101.54 11.62 230,829 199,845 Well AF Oct-03 Sch40 PVC 2 45.0 35.0 - 45.0 Shallow 3 101.61 11.69 230,491 199,702 Well AG-Shallow Feb-04 Sch40 PVC 1 24.2 14.2 - 24.2 Shallow 99.29 9.37 230,496 199,508 Well AG-Deep Feb-04 Sch-40 PVC 1 40.0 30.0 - 40.0 Shallow3 99.20 9.28 230,496 199,508 Well AH-Shallow Feb-04 Sch-40 PVC 1 24.5 14.5 - 24.5 Shallow 3 102.58 12.66 230,450 199,596 Well AH-Deep Feb-04 Sch40 PVC 1 40.0 30.0 - 40.0 Shallow 3 102.70 12.78 230,450 199,596 Well Al Jan-04 Sch-40 PVC 4 22.0 12.0 - 22.0 Cofferdam 2 98.79 8.87 230,798 199,521 Well AJ Jan-04 Sch40 PVC 4 35.3 15.3 - 35.3 Shallow3 98.85 8.93 230,670 199,665 Well AL Jan-04 Sch40 PVC 2 25.3 15.3 - 25.3 Shallow 99.13 9.21 230,594 199,806 Well AM Jan-04 Sch-40 PVC 4 20.9 10.9 - 20.9 Cofferdlam2 98.55 8.63 230,762 199,680 Well AN Jun-04 Sch40 PVC 4 25.0 10.0 - 25.0 Cofferdam2 98.76 8.84 230,727 199,735 Well AO Jun-04 Sch40 PVC 4 21.0 11.0 - 21.0 Cofferdam2 98.82 8.90 230,765 199,556 Well AP Jun-04 Sch-40 PVC 4 40.0 15.0 - 40.0 Shallow3 98.65 8.73 230,694 199,464 Well AQ Jun-04 Sch40 PVC 4 45.0 20.0 - 45.0 Shallow3 99.05 9.13 230,526 199,540 Well AR Jun-04 Sch40 PVC 4 43.0 18.0 - 43.0 Shallow3 99.22 9.30 230,622 199,626 Well AS Jun-04 Sch-40 PVC 4 41.5 16.5 - 41.5 Shallow3 99.44 9.52 230,566 199,604 Well AT Jun-04 Sch40 PVC 4 44.0 19.0 - 44.0 Shallow3 99.25 9.33 230,546 199,566 Notes:

MP Measuring Point bgs Below ground surface RPD Relative to plant datum amsl Relative to mean sea level (NAVD 1988)

Monitoring well is screened in the Vincentown Formation.

2 Monitoring well is screened in the shallow, water-bearing unit at a location within the limits of the cofferdam.

3 Monitoring well is screened in the shallow, water-bearing unit at a location outside the limits of the cofferdam.

4 The surface completions of Monitoring Wells S, U, V, W, M, AB, AC, and AD were converted from above-grade to flush-grade in February 2004.

ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Well Identification Sample Date Related Result (pCi/L) LUD Deviation (mgrLn) S(mgL) Detmected Well K 10/04/04 485 156 100 - - No Well K 11/03/04 598 148 98 1.6 1,270 No Well K 12/06/04 < 4,520 4,520 1,370 - - No Well K 01/10'05 480 152 98 2.12 1,200 No Well K 02101/05 602 139 93 _ - No Well K 03103/05 711 146 98 - - No Well K 04/05/05 740 147 97 - - No Well K 05/09105 473 155 100 - - No Well L 10/04/04 < 159 159 91 - - No Well L 11/03/04 < 142 142 84 - _ No Well L 12/06/04 < 4,520 4,520 1,280 - - No Well L 01110/05 < 158 158 93 - - No Well L 02/01/05 < 148 148 87 - - No Well L 03/07/05 < 158 158 94 0.832 2,400 No Well L 04/06/05 < 152 152 90 - _ No Well L 05/17/05 < 150 150 88 _ _ No Well Mt 10/04/04 3,040 144 - 126- No Well hi 11/03/04 2,818 143 125 _ _ No Well Ni 12/06/04 < 4,520 4,520 1,390 _ _ No Well hi 01/19/05 I .36,200. 2,650 2,830 _ _ No Well MI 02/09/05 42,300. 4,660 3,240 _ _ No Well M 03/02/05 53,300; 3,360 3,400 <3.33 24.3 No Well M 04Il1/05 .- 24,600 4,220 2,550 - - No Well M 05/03/05 10,031 147 192 _ _ No Well Ml 06106/05 14,400 4,220 2,550 _ _ No Notes:

LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/L Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocuries per liter I Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

20,000 . Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available - Deviation and/or LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

1 of 13

ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Well Identification Sample Date Related Result (pCi/L) LLD Deviation (Bmoron) S(dm/L) GDatctead Well N 10/25/04 10,619 157 206 - - No Well N I123104 9,150 149 187 - - No Well N 12/27/04 7,660 4,060 1.720 - - No Well N 01/12/05 9,550 154 195 - - No Well N 02122/05 9,442 146 186 _ - No Well N 03115/05 9,712 153 195 0.11 18 No Well N 04/19105 9,781 147 193 - - No Well N 05/17/05 9,060 148 185 - - No Well N' 06/21/05 9,010 3,750 1,770 - - No Well 0 10104/04 5,543 140 151 - - No Well 0 10/18104 5,874 150 161 - - No Well O 11/22/04 14,027 144 218 - _ No Well 0 12116104 15,000 3,230 1,950 - - No Well 0 01/18105 18,840 152 257 0.297 22.4 No Well 0 02/08105 l .:25,400 4,660 2,640 - - No Well 0 03/08105 10,911 139 195 _ _ No Well 0 04/11/05 7,096 148 170 _ _ No

-Well ---- 05/10/05 - - 6,722 148 - 167 .- - -- No Well 0' 06/07/05 4,050 3,460 1,420 _ _ No Well P 10/05/04 c 149 149 87 No Well P 11103/04 < 147 147 87 0.955 1,690 No Well P 12/14/04 < 3,230 3,230 1,010 No Well P 01/11105 < 162 162 95 1.02 1,580 No Well P 02/09/05 < 148 148 88 No W'ell P 03/03105 < 158 158 92 No Well P 04112/05 < 149 149 89 No Well P 05110105 < 148 148 87 No Notes LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/L Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocuries per liter I Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

20,000 Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available - Deviation and/or LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

2 of 13

ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Well Identification Sample Date Related Result (pCi/L) LLD Deviation Boron Sodium Gammas (mG/L) (mg/L) Detected Vell Q 10/04/04 < 153 153 87 - - No Well Q 11103/04 < 150 150 88 0.312 1,960 No WellQ 12129/04 k 4,020 4,020 1,420 - - No Well Q 01/31/05 213 142 89 _ No Well Q 02/15/05 < 3,910 3,910 1,130 - _ No WeIl Q 03/15/05 < 151 151 91 0.302 1,730 No Well Q 04/18105 < 145 145 85 - - No WeIl Q 05/16105 < 151 151 88 - No WVellR 10/11/04 1,710 143 110 - - No WellR 11/08/04 1,696 151 115 - - No

'ell R 12/27/04 < 4,053 4,053 1,290 - - No Well R 01119/05 2,420 159 129 - - No Well R 02/09/05 2,450 150 123 0.122 45.1 No Well R 03/15/05 2,704 147 125 - - No Well R 04/11/05 2,742 157 132 - - No Well R 05/03/05 2,755 151 128 - - No Well R' 06122105 < 3,750 3,750 1,400 - - No Well S 11/08/04 *820,000 3,230 12,800 - - No WellS 12/2S/04 661,000. 4,060 11,300 - - No Well S 01/11/05 - 753,000. 3,910 12.100 - - No Well S 02/15/05 - - 724,000 3,910 11.900 - - No Well S 03107/05 :364,000 3,490 8,570 - - No Well S 03/14/05 - - 175,000. 4,320 6,110 - - No Well S 03/23/05 -182,000 3,790 6,190 _ _ No Well S 03128105 40,500 6,280 3,540 _ _ No Well S 04/18/05 326,000 4,420 8,380 _ _ No Notes:

LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/L Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocuries per liter I Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent wvasnot detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

20,000 Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available - Deviation and/or LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

3 of 13

ARCADIS A Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Well Identification Sample Date Related Reul (~iL) LL Dvitin Boron Sodium Gammas Result (pCi/L) LLD Deviation (mg/L) (mg/L) Detected Well T 10111104 < 155 155 91 - - No Well T 11/09,'04 < 148 148 87 - - No Well T 12121/04 < 3,910 3,910 1,340 - - No Well O1/10/05 < 165 165 96 - - No Well T 02101105 137 135 83 0.638 945 No Well T 03/03/05 < 152 152 90 - - No Well T 04105/05 < 148 148 90 _ - No Well T 05109/05 < 144 144 86 _ - No Well U 10/04/04 < 146 146 87 - No Well U 11/03/04 165 148 91 _ - No Well U 12/06/04 < 4,520 4,520 1,160 _ - No Well U 01/10/05 < 157 157 93 - - No Well U 02/08105 < 149 149 91 0.377 156 No Well U 03/03/05 < 147 147 88 - - No Well U 04/05105 < 142 142 86 _ _ No Well U 05/09/05 < 148 148 90 No WeV 1004/04-- -340 - 146- 92 - - No Well V 11/03/04 224 143 89 _ _ No Well V 12/06/04 < 4,170 4,170 1,360 _ _ No.

Well V 01110/05 394 151 96 _ _ No Well V 02/08/05 307 152 95 _ _ No Well V 03/03/05 157 156 95 0.436 431 No Well V 04/05/05 294 141 89 - - No Well V 05/09/05 244 155 96 _ _ No LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/L Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocuries per liter I Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

20.000 - Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available -Deviation and/or LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

4 of 13

ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Well Identification Sample Date Related Result (pCi/L) LLD Deviation mog/n Somdu) Gammas Well W 10/111/04 9,947 147 194 - - No Well W 11/08/04 8,920 150 186 0.487 309 No Well W 12/14/04 5,560 3,230 1,390 - - No Well W 01/10105 6,292 150 165 0.681 273 No Well W 02/01/05 7,340 159 178 - - No Well W 03/02/05 5,756 150 158 <3.33 26.7 No Well W 04/05/05 8,826 155 192 - - No Well W 05/02/05 12,339 147 209 - - No Well Wt 06/06/05 9,010 3,460 1,720 - No Well Y 10/11/04 < 162 162 96 - - No Well Y 11/08/04 < 151 151 88 - - No Well Y 12/13/04 < 3,230 3,230 1,150 - - No WellY 01/10/05 < 162 162 94 0.801 1,160 No WellY 02101/05 < 154 154 92 - - No Well Y 03/07/05 < 149 149 89 - - No Well Y 04/06/05 < 144 144 84 0.761 1,190 No WellY 05/25/05 < 155 155 92 - 1,230 No

---0DWellY 6/07/05 <-----3,460- ---3,460-- - 1,090 - --_:_.No -

Well Z 10/11/04 268 144 90 _ _ No Well Z 11/08/04 339 155 98 0.491 548 No Well Z 12/13104 < 3,230 3,230 1,060 - - No Well Z 01/10/05 249 159 99 _ _ No Well Z 02/01/05 228 153 95 - - No Well Z 03/07/05 192 153 94 0.535 688 No WellZ 04/06/05 274 165 103 0.506 716 No Well Z 05/25/05 < 149 149 91 - 635 No WellZ' 06/07/05 < 3,460 3,460 1,110 _ - No WellAA 10111104 1,530 146 110 - - No WellAA 11/08/04 1,927 152 118 0.590 147 No Well AA 12/14104 < 3,230 3,230 1,130 - - No WellAA 01111/05 6,640 151 168 _ _ No Well AA 02/02/05 11,150 155 205 - - No Well AA 03/07/05 ....20.751 142 260 0.036 152 No Well AA' 04/06/05 -35,700 4,220 2.970 - - No Well AA' 05/02/05 22,800  :- 3,320 2.310 _ _ No Well AA' 06/06/05 16,400 3,460 2,100I _ No Notes:

LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/L Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocuries per liter I Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

I. -20,000 : . l Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available - Deviation andlor LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

5 of 13

- ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Well Identification Sample Date T Related Result (pCilL) LLD Deviation (ml/L) (mSL) DGammas Well AB 10/04/04 .-. :152,000. 3,320 6,000 - - No Well AB 10/12/D4 i152,000 .. 2,220 5,520 - - No Well AB 10118104 . 142,000 3,230 5,340 - - No Well AB 11/03/04  ; .167,000 . 2,720 5,850 - - No WellAB 11/08/04 :156,000 3,230 5,650 - _ - No Well AB 11/15/04 161,000 3,910 5,800 - - No Well AB 11/29/04 163,000 2,650 5,730 - - No Well AB 12/13104 . 146,000 : 3,230 5,410 - - No Well AB 01/11/05  :. 142,000. 3,910 5,330 - - No Well AB 01/27/05  :. 160,000 - 2,470 5,650 _ - No Well AD 01/31/05 *156,000 - 4,560 5,770 - - No Well AB 02/01/05 . 7 155,000 2,650 5,630 _ - No Well AB 02/08/05 7. 141,000 - 4,660 5,560 - - No Well AB 03/02/05  :. -151,376 144 664 - _ No Well AB 03/07/05

  • 160,000 3,490 5,770 - - No Well AB 03/14/05 -158,000

.. 4,320 5,760 - _ No Well AB 03/23/05 163,000 3,790 5,830 - _ No Well AB 03128105 153,000 6,280 5,920 - _ No

--- Wel AB-- -04/18105- -135,000- -- 4,420 ---5,470--

--- . -No----

Well AB 05/18/05 ... 224,000 .* 3,490 7,050 _ No Well AB 06122/05  : 97,300 ...; 3,750 4,460 _ _ No Well AC 09/0 1/04 -1,940,000 4,520 19,400 No Well AC 01/11/05 l  ; 699,000 3,910 11,600 _ No Well AC 01/17/05  : _<680,000. 3,360 11,600 _ No Well AC 02/09/05 .:'. 614,000 4,660 11,,200 -_ No Well AC 04/29/05 .  ;-32,400 3,320 2,650 _ No Well AC 05/25105 -34.100 3,320 2,760 -_ No Well AC 06/16/05 - 26300. 3,750 2,520 _ . _ No LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/L Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocuries per liter I Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

20,000  : Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available - Deviation and/or LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

6 of 13

ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Well Identification Sample Date . Related Result (pCi/L) LLD Deviation Boron Sodium Gammas (miQ) (mg/L) Detected Well AD 03102/05  : .672,000:. 3,670 11,700 - - No Well AD 03/07105 . .613,000:, . 3,490 11.300 - - No Well AD 03/14/05 c 717,000. 4,320 12,100 - - No Well AD 03/23/05 558,000 . 3,790 10,700 - - No Well AD 03/28105  :.: -42.200 6,280 3,640 - - No Well AD 04/18/05 . 481,000: .:: 4,420 10,000 - - No Well AD 05/18/05 . 449,000 3,490 9,320 - - No Well AD 06/22/05 - 340,000- 3,750 8,160 - - No Well AE 10/18104 5,375 150 156 - - No Well AE 11/22104 4,636 152 149 - _ No Well AE 12/16/04 < 3,230 3,230 1,200 - - No Well AE 01/18105 7,530 164 185 - - No Well AE 02108105 10,100 147 192 0.099 10.6 No Well AE 03108105 13,026 142 212 - - No Well AE 04/11105 8,832 157 192 - - No Well AE 05/10105 9,305 147 187 - - No Well AE' 06107105 10,200 3,460 1.790 - - No WellAF 10/12104 < 151 151 90 - - No Well AF 11/16/04 168 153 94 - - No Well AF 12/21/04 < 3,910 3,910 1,130 - - No Well AF 01/11105 < 3,910 3,910 1,180 - - No Well AF 02108105 < 154 154 94 0.644 843 No Well AF 03/14105 < 4.320 4,320 1,240 - - No Well AF 04/11/05 363 148 94 _ _ No Well AF 05109105 245 143 89 No LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg1L Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocuries per liter I Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

-. 20,000 . Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available - Deviation and/or LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

7of 13

ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results. PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Well Identification Sample Date Related Result (pCi/L) LL D Deviation Boron Sodium Gammas Reut(~I) LD(mg/L) (rmg/L) Detected Well AG-Deep 10105104 8,613 156 190 - - No Well AG-Deep 10/18104 12,456 144 209 - - No Well AG-Deep 11104/04 7.424 139 167 - - No Well AG-Deep 11/09/04 l- 31,500t 3,230 2,690 - - No Well AG-Deep 11/15/04 11,993 ISO 209 - - No Well AG-Decp 11122/04 3,813 148 138 - - No Well AG-Deep I 1129f04 8,860 2,650 1,580 - - No Well AG-Deep 12/07/04 < 4,170 4,170 1,510 - - No Well AG-Deep 12114/04 6,910 3,230 1,500 - - No Well AG-Deep 12/21/04 < 3,910 3,910 1,370 - - No Well AG-Deep 12128/04 5,710 4,060 1,570 - - No Well AG-Deep 01107105 6,300 IS0 166 - - No Well AG-Deep 01/11105 8,700 143 180 - - No Well AG-Deep 01/18105 4,880 154 153 0.823 836 No Well AG-Deep 01/26105 4,040 141 139 - - No Well AG-Deep 02102/05 6,455 155 168 - - No Well AG-Deep 02109/05 6,310 149 162 - - No Well AG-Deep 02/14/05 5,995 146 159 - - No

_Well AG-Deep 02/22105 9,570 155 107 - - No Well AG-Deep 03/03/05 1,099 148- 1_ No Well AG-Deep 03107/05 937 155 106 _ _ No Well AG-Deep 03/14/05 1,026 143 101 _ _ No Well AG-Deep 03/23/05 1,203 149 107 _ _ No Well AG-Deep 03/28/05 1,271 141 102 _ No Well AG-Deep 04/05/05 764 169 113 0.390 1,060 No Well AG-Deep 04/18105 938 162 III 0.344 971 No Well AG-Deep 05/03105 1,380 149 109 - 958 No Well AG-Deep 05/16/05 798 144 98 _ 876 No Well AG-Deep' 6/6/056 < 3,460 3,460 1,150 _ - No Notes:

LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/. Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocurics per liter I Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

20,000 -Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available - Deviation and/or LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

13 8 of

ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Well Identification Sample Date B S Related Result (pCi/L) LLD Deviation Bo(mrLo S L) Detected Well AG-Shallow 10/05104 11,088 154 207 - - No Well AG-Shallow 10/18104 16,353 143 233 - - No Well AG-Shallow 11/04/04 15.313 150 231 - - No Well AG-Shallow 11/09/04 . 22,100 3,230 2,320 - - No Well AG-Shallow 11/15/04 .21,200 3,910 2.390 - - No WVellAG-Shallow 11/22/04 -. 20.300.- 4,220 2,350 - - No Well AG-Sihallow 11/29104 '; 21,300 l,'.: 2,650 2,220 - - No Well AG-Shallow 12/07/04 < 4,170 23,700 2,480 - _ No Well AG-Shallow 12/14104 2 - 3,230 2,330 - - No Well AG-Shallow 12/21/04 . :23,700 . 4,020 2.700 - - No Well AG-Shallow 12128104 .22.200 4,060 2,380 - - No Well AG-Shallow 01/07/05 -28,800  !:. 3,910 2,610 - - No 33 200 Well AG-Shallow 01/11105  : , . : 3,910 2,770 - - No Well AG-Shallow 01/18/05 I! 29,400: : 3,950 2,630 - - No Well AG-Shallow 01/26105 . 21.600 - 149 267 - - No Well AG-Shallow 02/02105 -29,700 -- 4,660 2,810 - - No Well AG-Shallow 02/09/05  :-27,200 4,660 2,710 - - No Well AG-Shallow 02/14/05 24,300 3,910 2,480 - - No

_ Well AG-Shallow -02122/05- ._ 11,929- --- 154.. --- 211-- - __.. _ __

--_ No Well AG-Shallow 03/03/05 6,994 158 174 _ _ No Well AG-Shallow 03107/05 7,239 136 164 _ _ No Well AG-Shallow 03/14105 7,693 143 171 _ _ No Well AG-Shallow 03/23105 9,248 147 187 _ _ No Well AG-Shallow 03/28105 9,399 141 183 _ No Well AG-Shallow 04105105 9,357 143 187 0.175 240 No Well AG-Shallow 04/118/05 3,472 152 138 0.144 426 No Well AG-Shallow 05103105 6,858 151 169 - 236 No Well AG-Shallow 05/16/05 2,493 146 121 _ 876 No Well AG-Shallowl 06/06/05 < 3,460 3,460 1,200 - _ No Notes*

LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/L Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocurics per liter I Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

20,000 Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available - Deviation and/or LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

9 of 13

ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Well Identiflication Sample Date Related Result (pCi/L) LLD Deviation Boron Sodium Gammas (mg/L) (mgIL) Detected Well AH-Dcep 10/18104 308 144 90 _ _ No Well AH-Dcep 11115/04 < 3,910 3,910 1,328 _ _ No Well AlH-Deep 12/20/04 < 3,910 3,910 1,130 - - No Well All-Deep 01111/05 487 154 t00 0.235 250 No Well AH-Deep 02115/05 493 147 96 - - No Well All-Deep 03/08/05 529 146 96 - - No Well All-Deep 04/18/05 407 150 96 0.298 673 No Well Ali-Deep 05/16105 492 146 95 - 654 No Well AH-Deep 06/07/05 < 3.460 3.460 1,090 - - No Well AM-Shallow 10/18/04 420 159 101 No Well AH-Shallow 11/15/04 < 3,910 3,910 1,235 _ _ No Well Al-Shallow 12/20104 < 3,910 3,910 1,130 _ _ No Well All-Shallow 01/11/05 658 163 107 0.446 61.3 No Well All-Shallow 02/15/05 633 146 97 _ _ No Well All-Shallow 03/08/05 614 147 97 _ _ No Well All-Shallow 04118/05 319 146 92 0.138 216 No Well All-Shallow 05/16/05 249 150 93 _ 277 No

_ Well All-Shallowl 06107/05 < -3,460 -- -- 3,460 1,090 - -- No Well Al 12/27/04 13,120 153 222 . _ No Well Al 04/19/05 11,600 4,420 2,040 _ No Well Al' 05/10O5 l.. .31,100: 3,320 2,420 _ _ No Well Al' 06121/05 34,400.-.-- 3,750 2,820 No LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/L Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocuries per liter Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

20,000 - l Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available - Deviation and'or LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

10 of 13

ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC. Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Well Identification Sample Date Related Result (pCi/L) LLD Deviation BoronmgL) So m GammD Well AJ 10118f04 _ 54,800 3,230 3,560 - - No Well Al 11/16/04 193.000 3,910 6,440 - - No Well Al 12128/04 '- 144,000 2,820 5,450 - - No Well AJ 01/12/05 366,000 3,910 8,540 - - No Well Al 02114/05 331,000 :. 3,910 8,260 - _ No Well Al 03/02/05 218,000 ' 3,670 5,710 - - No Well AJ 03/07/05  : 155,000 -. 3,490 5,670 - - No Well Al 03114/05 . '172.000 4,320 6,120 - - No Well Al 0323/05 * .J70,400 .- . 3,790 3,720 _ - No Well Al 03128/05 .. .152,000. 6,280 5,880 - No Well A 04/18/05 . 139,000 4,420 5,490 - _ No Well Al 05/18/05 ':122,000' 3,490 4,900 - - No Well AL 10112/04 < 146 146 85 - - No Well AL 11/16/04 < 3,910 3,910 1,126 - - No Well AL 12121/04 < 3,910 3,910 1,130 - - No Well AL 01/11/05 < 157 157 92 - - No Well AL 02/08/05 < 157 157 92 0.230 73.5 No Well AL_ 03/14705 < 146 " ----146- '87 - --No WellAL 04/11/05 < 158 158 93 _ No Well AL 05/09/05 < 150 150 88 _ No Well AM 10/25/04 124,000 . 3,030 5,080 _ No Well AM I I23/04 .':116,000 . 4,220 4,940 _ _ No Well AM 12127/04 103,000. 4,060 4,590 _ No Well AM 01/12/05 .:. 108,000  : 3.910 4,660 _ No Well AM 02/22/05 89,300:. 3,550 4,340 _ No Well AM 03/15/05 76,900 4,320 4,100 _ _ No Well AM 04119105 .:54,200 : 4,420 3,570 _ _ No Well AM 05117/05 . 58,400 .. 3,490 3,480 _ _ No Well AM' 06121OS5  ;.53,800 <.-. 3,750 3,420 _ _ No LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/A Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocuries per liter I Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

20,000 7 IConstituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available - Deviation andlor LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

11 of 13

ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Sample Date ______Related Well Identification Result (pCVL) LLD Dcviation Boron Sodium Gammas Reut(~iL L Dvain (mg/L) (mgIL) Detected Well AN 10/25104 8,950 147 185 - - No Well AN 11/23/04 6,245 144 158 - _ No Well AN 12129/04 < 4.020 4,020 1.210 - - No Well AN 01/12/05 6,180 159 169 - - No Well AN 03/02105 192,000 ' 3,670 6,300 - - No Well AN 03/07105 171,000 - - 3,490 5,940 _ _ No Well AN 03114/05 -154,000 4,320 5,700 _ - No U'ell AN 03/23/05 -172,000 3,790 6,030 - - No Well AN 03/28105 -:. 98.900 6,280 4,900 - - No Well AN 04/11805 149,000' 2 4.420 5,650 - - No Well AN 05/1 8/05 12 1,000 . 3,490 4.920 - - No Well AN' 06/22/05 98,000 - 3,750 4,470 - - No Well AO 10/25/04 2,305 139 116 - - No Well AO 11/23/04 2,570 147 123 - - No Well AO 12/27/04 < 4,060 4,060 1,370 - - No Well AO 01112/05 1,780 166 125 - - No Well AO 03/07/05 .158,000 . 3,490 5,710 - - No Well AO 03/14/05 138,000 4,320 5,430 _ - No Well AO 0323/05_ 192,000 -. 3,790 -- 6.570 _ _ _No Well AO 03128/05 6,395 147 162 _ _ No Well AP 10/11/04 777 151 102 _ _ No Well AP 11/22104 1,531 150 112 0.204 65 No Well AP 12/14104 < 3,230 3,230 984 - - No Well AP 0127105 1,200 138 102 0.160 134 No Well AP 0201/05 2,680 153 128 - - No Well AP 03/07/05 :70,300 - 3,490 3,970 - - No Well AP 04/05/05 .- 100,000 4,220 4,730 - - No Well AP 05/02105 .. 94,400 3,320 1,690 - - No Well AP 06/06/05 106,000 . 3,460 4,630 - - No Well AP 06/21/05 .46,400 3,750 3,220 - - No Well AP 07/06/05 < 3,490 3,490 1,090 - - No Well AQ 10/26/04 201 144 89 - _ No Well AQ 11/16/04 218 147 91 - - No Well AQ 12121/04 < 4,280 4,280 1,300 - - No Well AQ 01/27/05 225 135 84 - - No Well AQ 02/02105 < 148 148 90 0.448 1,100 No Well AQ 03/14t05 367 145 92 - _ No Well AQ 04112/05 247 143 89.0 _ _ No Well AQ 05/09/05 248 151 94.0 _ _ No No=

LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/L Milligrams per liter pCi/L Picocuries per liter I Reported analytical results are from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected abovethe indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

_. l . . 20,-000 . Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available - Deviation and/or LLD were not reported.

-J Constituent not analyzed.

12 of 13

ARCADIS Table 02. Groundwater Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

Tritium Major Cations and Anions Plant Sample Date .Related Well Identification Result (pCiL) LLD Deviation Boron Sodium Gammas Reut(~l) LD Dvain (mg/L) (mg/L) Detected Well AR 10/26/04 . 589.000 . . 3,030 1 ,o0o - - No Well AR 12/28/04 423,000 4.060 9,050 - - No Well AR 01/27/05 336,000 2,470 8,140 - - No Well AR 02/22/05 ,; 334,000 - 3,550 8,220 - - No Well AR 03/14/05  : 204.000 4,320 6,510 - - No Well AR 04/12/05 233,000 4,220 7,010 - -_ No Well AR 05/10/05 .215,000'; 3,620 6,420 - - No Well AR' 06/21/05 . 227,000. 3,750 6,670 - - No Well AS 10/11/04 9,899 156 200 - - No Well AS 11116/04 14,400 3,910 2,090 - - No Well AS 12/21/04 15,200 3,910 2.070 - - No Well AS 01)27/05 14,000 143 224 0.459 186 No Well AS 03/02/05 l. :23,400 . 3,670 2,430 - - No Well AS 03/07/05 <40,100 3,490 3,020 - - No Well AS 03/14/05 12,600 4,320 2,080 - - No Well AS 03/23/05 '72,400 3,790 4,050 - - No Well AS 03/28/05 67,6000. . 6,280 4,180 - - No Well AS 04/1805*_ - 75,700 .- 4,420 4,140 _ No Well AS 05/18/05  :. 59,200* 4,420 1,600 _ _ No WellAS' 06/22/05 . 64,900 3,750 3,730 _ _ No Well AT 12/8/04 < 4,060 4,060 1,260 No Well AT 01/19105 1,91 159 124 0.286 163 No Well AT 03/02/05 :40,200 - 3,670 3,030 - - No Well AT 03/07/05 - . 1,200*0 . 3,490 2,330 - - No Well AT 03/14/05 58,400 4,320 3,660 - - No Well AT 03/23/05 10,039 50 195 - - No Well AT 03/28/05 7,973 148 176 _ - No Well AT 04/18/05 4,974 151 153 0.267 396 No Well AT' 05/18O05 3,451 151 136 - - No Well AT' 06/22/05 < 3,750 3,750 1,300 _ No Not' LLD Lower Limit of Detection mg/L Milligrams per liter pCiVL Picocurics per liter I Reported analytical results arc from Salem Chemistry. Maplewood results are pending.

< Constituent was not detected above the indicated laboratory detection limit.

762 Constituent was detected above the laboratory method detection limit.

20,000 Constituent was detected above its New Jersey Groundwater Quality Criteria.

NA Not Available- Deviation and/or LLD were not reported.

- Constituent not analyzed.

13 of 13

ARCADIS Table 3.Analytical Sample Schedule for Monitoring of Full-Scale Tritium Recovery System PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station.

_ Sampling Program rough Mav 31. 2005 Samplin Program Effective June 1.2005 Monitoring Vt1l Di-Weekly Monthly B1i-WVeekly Monthly Quarterly Semi Annually Well _ x X Well L x x Well NI x x W ell N x x Vell 0 x x Vell P x x Well Q x x Vell R x x

'ell St2 x x Well T x X WVell U x x Well V x x WellW x X

'ell V x x Well Z x x x Well AA x x 2

Well AB X X Wel f AC X X 2

Vell AD x X Well AE x x WeIIAF x x Well AG-S x x Well A G-D x x WelI All-S x X Well AII-D x x Week Al x x We* AJa x X Well AL x x Well AM x X Well AN' X X Well AO "'

Well AP x x x 2

Well AQ X Well AR x x 2

Well AS X X llell AT 2 X X ALL Sample collections Include samples for Salem Chemistry screening for Tritium and Gamma I Well out of service.

I Permanent System Pumping Wells 3 'Vell Is isolated and will not be sampled.

ARCADIS Table 04. Mobile Groundwater Extraction System Operational Data and Tritium Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station Permit Number Gallons Recovered Date of Discharge Tritium Results (pCUL) 50159 1000 June 28.2005 57,700 50170 500 July 1, 2005 68.600 50183 1000 July 22,2005 30,900 Notes:

I concentration estimated based upon results of prior and following events Site operational changes resulted in a temporary suspension of gap draining activities.

J resumed as of the preparation of this document I ofI

ARCADIS Table 05. Groundwater Extraction System Operational Data and Tritium Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Salem Generating Station Sample Number Release End Date Volume Discharged Tritium Results (pCiUL) 1 2122/2005 137,810 36,200 2 3/1/005 84,566 109,000 3 3/8/2005 2,687 66,500 4, 3/10/2005 459 30,300 5 3/17/2005 178,372 53,900 6 324/2005 173,513 65,800 7 3/31/2005 143,437 72,800 8 47/2005 140,279 58,300 9 4/15/2005 270,445 65,300 10 4/20/2005 63,835 63,500 11 4/28/2005 99,244 61,900 12 4/28/2005 10,178 62.200 13 5/5/2005 27,366 60,100 14 5/12/2005 32,950 70,300 15 5/19/2005 23,013 59,900 16 5/26/2005 56,727 64,400 17 6/2/2005 40,437 54.400 18 6/9/2005 66,012 52,600 19 6/9/2005 80,460 60,400 20 6/16/2005 38.457 63.800 2- - ---- 6/30/2005------- -113,247 ------ 51,50-Note Groundwater extraction system activated on February 16, 2005 1 of 1

ARCADIS Table 06. Seismic Gap Drain Tritium Analytical Results, PSEG Nuclear, LLC. Salem Generating Station Gallons Recovered Date of Operation Tritium Results (pCiIL) 300 October 5. 2004 2,590.000 365 October 13,2004 74,600,000 500 October 21, 2004 75.600,000 560 October 27, 2004 1.920,000 550 November 3.2004 66.300,000 500 November 8. 2004 103,000.000 500 November 15, 2004 61.900,000 550 November 23, 2004 46,800.000 475 December 1,2004 40,400,000 600 December 8. 2004 63,400.000 200 December 14,2004 44,800,000 500 December 21,2004 89,900.000 300 January 4, 2005 13,600.000 600 January 11, 2005 40,900,000 1000 January 19, 2005 17,700.000 500 January 24, 2005 57,900,000 525 February 2, 2005 46.700.000 500 February 9,2005 53.800.000 500 February 25. 2005 895,000 500 February 28. 2005 59,400,000 500 March 9,2005 31,800,000 500 April 1, 2005 39.300,000 475 April 13,2005 34,600,000 34.600.000'

-I 475 Aoril 13. 2005 I 29.900.000 500 500 April 21.2005 Apnl 21, 2005 29,900,000 500 May 11, 2005 25,600,000 450 May 19. 2005 33,400.000 600 May 25.2005 37,400.000 475 June 9.2005 35.800.000 Notes I2concentration estimated based upon results of prior and following events Site operational changes resulted in atemporary suspension of gap draining activities.

Draining activities had resumed as of the preparation of this document 1 of 1

S -

-p 27

-% .4iiw Yi -

x

-n - --.- -

.V1#A f.

C) 1 N .

- ) 4 /

A .

-r - -

I' I/ /  ;*

STATION 4 -.-. - -.t--¶..&*

- - - J U - _

k- - -a

-V -

1- - .

0 -- - -- -

a)

I-rrW 'I I -

'S Stony

/i Stony Pojnt'

.4 4

.4.

  • -4.4 -

-ft

.4 4<

-4,I CI SCALE 1:24000 1 4 0 a1 MILE wkG'...

6 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET F_~ i_ i 10W \

1 .5 0 1 KILOMETER 187 41L l 021' 6 MIL CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET QUADRANGLE LOCATION NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 UTM GRID AND 1981 SO!CE: USGS 7.5 MIN. TOPOGRAPHICA WZAGETYOSBIE MAGNFTICNnRTH DEL-N.J. 198 HOTORE)ASED 1981. _-......s~

G DRAWN DATE PROJECTMANAGER DEPARTMENT MANAGER I WAS11EYM 4/25/04 P. MIUNIS _ D. FJLrTG I l_ gBNLOAN

_ __ ___ __TALSTAION LOCATION LEAD DESIGN S. POTE_

PBROF CHECKED 8. RC PSEGNUCLEAR. LLC PROJECT NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER

_ __ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ A AK ARCA CAI ADIS& VI SSALEM -AL GENERATING ARTIF.I BRDGE, STATIONPP000571.0004P ISLAND NEW JERSEY 0 57 0 41 1 G\,APR OJEiT\PSE&G\Saoem - Tritium\NP000571.0004 Remedial ActosCADD\RAPR8\RAPR - 3 -02 2i005\FG-01 STATION LOAT0NDG 8l/03/2005 - 2:07:06 PM Lavout: 8.5x11 H CO)

THIS PAGE IS AN OVERSIZED DRAWING OR FIGURE, THAT CAN BE VIEWED AT THE RECORD TITLED:

DRAWING NO. 2 "STATION LAYOUT" WITHIN THIS PACKAGE... OR BY SEARCHING USING THE DOCUMENT/REPORT NO. 2 D-01

THIS PAGE IS AN OVERSIZED DRAWING OR FIGURE, THAT CAN BE VIEWED AT THE RECORD TITLED:

DRAWING NO. 3 "GROUNDWATER TRITIUM RESULTS" WITHIN THIS PACKAGE... OR BY SEARCHING USING THE

  • DOCUMENT/REPORT NO. 3 D-02

THIS PAGE IS AN OVERSIZED DRAWING OR FIGURE, THAT CAN BE VIEWED AT THE RECORD TITLED:

DRAWING NO. 5 "WATER TABLE ELEVATION CONTOURS PRIOR TO SYSTEM START-UP MARCH 19, 2004"9 WITHIN THIS PACKAGE... OR BY SEARCHING USING THE DOCUMENT/REPORT NO. 5 D-03

THIS PAGE IS AN OVERSIZED DRAWING OR FIGURE, THAT CAN BE VIEWED AT THE RECORD TITLED:

DRAWING NO. 6 "WATER TABLE ELEVATION CONTOURS DURING OPERATION OF THE PERMANENT SYSTEM JULY 7, 2005"9 WITHIN THIS PACKAGE... OR BY SEARCHING USING THE DOCUMENT/REPORT NO. 6 D-04

N1 S .

PSEG Nuclear, LLC Salem Generating Station - Unit I Tritium Recovered Through Well Field Operation 1.400 900000 1 Tritium Removed Per Pumping Cycle 800000 -

1.200 -j

, -- Tritium Concentration Per PumDina C 0.

700000 CL 0 1.000 600000 c

.)

0 0

0.800 500000 a 0

E 0.600 0 C.

S.

E 0.400  :

200000 E 0.200 100000; 0.000 0 uL u) LO uL uL U) o o 0 o C) o N-)

C")

0 "4'

0 U) 0 (0 a 0 o o o o o 0 0 0 C% It a0t

- (

N - - i

('4 - _-

Cn Mu C Q '4 U) co~ I fl- co-)

CDat 0 '-

'- (N Date (9 a PRAYM _ ATE PROJECTMANAGER DEPARTMENT MANAGER PSMG NULALCLEAD DESIGN PROF. CHECKED A U SALEM GENERATING STAllON HISTORIC iRIlUM RECOVERED aPIERCE e_ARCZiSARTiRCIAL S.v PO*MR - .

ISLAND THROUGH WU ELD.fjJ PROJECTNUMBER DRAY*ING 7

NUMBER

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ HANCOCK'S BRIDGE, NEW JERSEY OPERAllON NP000571.OOO

- R .

, fry

i PSEG Nuclear, LLC Salem Generating Station - Unit I Tritium Recovered Through Seismic Gap Drain Operation W 11~11Tritium RmvdDuring Drainage Event 3.50 Removed Tritium Concentration Per Drainage Event 100000000

-4Cumulative Tritium Removed 3.00 3 -_

C 80000000 W' C* 2.50 ..

  • S K2.00 --- "..-

60000000 0

E IL~

NN E 1.5040000000 1.00 0 C-C1 0c00o 0) 0 0 0 01 0L0

§ Date DRAWN IDATE PROJECT MANAGER DEPARTMENT MANAGER M. WASILEWSKII /70 P. MIOWNS - M. BODARD PSG UCERLL PROF. CHNECKED EAD) DESIGN SALEM GENERATING STATION HISTORIC TRIllUM RECOVERED I. POTVE B. PORC AD AlCARTIFICIAL ISLAND THROUGH SEISMIC GAP DRAIN 1 .

=PROCT NUMBER! DRAWN6N NUMBER II1 IsJU E HANCOC'S BRIDGE. NEW %IERSEY OPERATION NP000571.000 8

~I (c)Y