ML051930218

Final - Section a Operating (SRO) (Folder 3)

ML051930218
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	04/14/2005
From:	Berry P Entergy Nuclear Northeast
To:	Suzanne Dennis Operations Branch I
Conte R
References
Download: ML051930218 (33)

Text

m E Entqy James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Nuclear Northeast OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE SRO NEW TASK TITLE: Determine Visitor RCA Access Reauirements APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV:

0 DATE:

1 /14/05 NRC K/A SYSTEM NUMBER: Generic 2.3.4 JAF TASK NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME:

15 Minutes SUBMITTED:

OPERATION REVIEW:

APPROVED:

JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER:

1

~

~

1 1

1 1

1 1

1

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

CANDIDATE NAME:

S.S. NUMBER:

JPM Completion:

(

) Simulated

( X 1 Performed Location:

( X ) Plant

( X ) Simulator DATE PERFORMED:

TIME TO COMPLETE:

Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:

(

) Satisfactory

(

) Unsatisfactory

_ - _ - 1 _ " - - _ - - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ 1 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ 1 1 _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

COMMENTS: (MANDATORY FOR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE)

EVALUATOR:

SIGNATURE/PRINTED Page 1 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST SRO NEW TASK TITLE: Determine Visitor RCA Access Requirements APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update:

1 /14/05 By: RWD Date Int.

Outstanding Items:

Technical Review Questions and Answers Procedural Change Required Additional Information Validation X

None Comments:

Page 2 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATION SRO NEW TASK TITLE: Determine Visitor RCA Access Reauirements APPL. TO JPM NUMBER I.

II.

111.

IV.

V.

VI.

SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A.

None REFERENCES A.

B.

AP-07.05, Exposure Monitoring and Radiological Controls for Site & RCA Access, Rev. 10 LP-AP, Lesson Plan for Site Administrative Procedures.

TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A.

None SET UP REQUIREMENTS A.

None EVALUATOR NOTES A.

If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and not actually performed.

The candidate should, at a minimum, identify the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

B.

TASK CONDITIONS A.

Task must be performed in an area allowing access to Site Administrative Procedures.

• - CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 6

SRO TASK TITLE: Determine Visitor RCA Access Requirements VII.

INITIATING CUE

1.

2.

A Technical Representative from The Viking Valve Corporation is arriving tomorrow to evaluate replacing the Main Condenser Pit Foam Fire Suppression System. General Area Dose Rates range from 0 - 5 mr/hr and the evaluation is expected to take approximately 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. You will be the visitor sponsor and visitor escort. Security arrangements have already been completed. He has never been exposed to or monitored for Occupational Radiation Exposure. Identify the individuals' Administrative Dose Limits and ensure that all necessary Radiological Protection requirements are completed to expedite getting him to the Turbine Building Foam Room.

STANDARD Candidate obtains and reviews AP-07.05, Exposure Monitoring and Radiological Controls for Site and RCA VIII.

TASK STANDARD EVALUATION / COMMENT SAT / UNSAT The candidate will determine administrative dose limitations and complete documentation to have a dosimeter issued per AP-07.05.

STEP Candidate identifies the need for AP-07.05, Exposure Monitoring and Radiological Controls for Site and RCA Access.

6.6.1 Visitor RCA Access Requirements Form (Attachment 3) shall be routed and completed.

II SAT I '

A T Candidate identifies the need to complete Attachment I 3 to AP-07.05 EVALUATOR Hand partially completed Attachment 3 to candidate.

EVALUATOR If requested, inform candidate that General Area Dose Rates in the Foam Room are < 1 mr/hr and no hot spots or contamination areas exist.

Page 4 of 6

SRO i: Determine Visitor RCA Access Requi STEP Complete Attachment 3.

Obtain Attachment 5.

5.9 Definition of Working Visitor ments STANDARD Candidate fills in the following information

+ TLD Required From: Tomorrow

+ TLD Required To: Tomorrow

+ Reason RCA Access is Required: Evaluate replacement of Main Condenser Pit Foam Fire Suppression System.

+ Check Any Applicable: Entering Radiation Area EVALUATOR Act as RP Supervisor and accept completed. Request Administrative Dose Limitation.

Candidate reviews Attachment 5 and determines the following Administrative Dose Limits

+ TEDE 0.4 rem/year

+ LDE 1.2 rem/year

+ SDE/WB 4.0 rem/year

+ SDE/ME 4.0 rem/year

+ TODE 4.0 rem/year EVALUATOR: Terminate the task at this point.

EVALUATION / COMMENT SAT / UNSAT

• CRITICAL STEP*

SAT / UNSAT

• CRITICAL STEP*

Page 5 of 6

INITIATING CUE A Technical Representative from The Viking Valve Corporation is arriving tomorrow to evaluate replacing the Main Condenser Pit Foam Fire Suppression System. General Area Dose Rates range from 0 - 5 mr/hr and the evaluation is expected to take approximately 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. You will be the visitor sponsor and visitor escort. Security arrangements have already been completed.

He has never been exposed to or monitored for Occupational Radiation Exposure. Identify the individuals' Administrative Dose Limits and ensure that all necessary Radiological Protection requirements are completed to expedite getting him to the Turbine Building Foam Room.

Page 6 of 6

ab 2.cT=c Entergv James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Nuclear Northeast OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE SRO NEW TASK TITLE: DETERMINE PLANT CHEMISTRY TECH SPEC / TRM COMPLIANCE APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV:

0 DATE:

3/1 1/05 NRC K/A SYSTEM NUMBER: G 2.2.22 4.1 JAF TASK NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME:

10 Minutes SU BM ITTED :

APPROVED:

JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER:

OPERATION REVIEW:

_ _ 1 _ _ " " " " " " " " _ " _ _ _ _ _ " " " " " - " " - " " " - - - - - - - - " " " " - " " " - " " " " " " " " " - " " - " " " - " - - - " - - - " - " "

CANDIDATE NAME:

S.S. NUMBER:

JPM Completion:

(

) Simulated( X 1 Performed Locat ion:

( X ) Plant

( X ) Simulator DATE PERFORMED:

TIME TO COMPLETE:

Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:

(

1 Satisfactory

(

) Unsatisfactory 1 _ _ " " " _ " _ " _ " _ - - - " - " " 1 _ _ 1 1 _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ - - - - - " " - " - - " - " " " - " - " - " - - " " " - " " - - " - "

COMMENTS: (MANDATORY FOR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE)

EVALUATOR:

SI G N AT U RE/PR I NTED Page 1 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST SRO NEW TASK TITLE: DETERMINE PLANT CHEMISTRY TECH SPEC / TRM COMPLIANCE APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update:

3/11 /05 Date By:

RWD Int.

Outstanding Items:

Technical Review Additional Information Questions and Answers Validation Procedural Change Required X

None Comments:

Page 2 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATION SRO NEW TASK TITLE: DETERMINE PLANT CHEMISTRY TECH SPEC / TRM COMPLIANCE APPL. TO JPM NUMBER

1.

SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A.

None II.

REFERENCES A.

Technical Specifications, Section 3.4.6 B.

Technical Requirements Manual, Section 3.4.B and Table 3.4.B-1 111.

TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A.

None IV.

SET UP REQUIREMENTS A.

Obtain a current copy of Technical Specifications and TRM.

V.

EVALUATOR NOTES A.

If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and not actually performed.

B.

The candidate should, at a minimum, identify the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

VI.

TASK CONDITIONS A.

A Reactor Startup was initiated from Cold Shutdown conditions 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> ago. Reactor Power is just above 10% CTP with power ascension in progress.

B.

Verbal notification of reactor water sample results received in Control Room, from Chemistry Technician, with the following parameters:

Dose Equivalent Iodine:

0.0001 Ci / gram Conductivity:

6.1 mho / cm Chlorides:

0.04 ppm

• - CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 6

SRO TASK TITLE: DETERMINE PLANT CHEMISTRY TECH SPEC / TRM COMPLIANCE VII.

INITIATING CUE C.

A Reactor Startup was initiated from Cold Shutdown conditions 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> ago. Reactor Power is just above 10% CTP with power ascension in progress. Verbal notification of reactor water sample results received in Control Room, from Chemistry Technician, with the following parameters:

Dose Equivalent Iodine:

0.0001 Ci / gram Conductivity:

6.1 mho I cm Chlorides:

0.04 ppm As the Control Room Supervisor, evaluate compliance with Technical Specifications and the TRM.

VIII.

TASK STANDARD The candidate will utilize Technical Specification 3.4.6 and TRM 3.4.B to evaluate results and determine parameters are acceptable for the given plant condition.

1.

• 2.

STEP Obtain and review Technical Specifications (TS) and Technical Requirements Manual (TRM).

Evaluate Technical Specification 3.4.6 to determine if reported DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-1 31 parameter is in compliance with specification.

STANDARD Candidate obtains and reviews Technical Specifications and TRM. Candidate determines that the start point is TS 3.4.6 and TRM 3.4.B.

EVALUATOR:

Either document section may be obtained / reviewed in any order. Therefore, the subsequent three steps may be performed in any order.

Candidate evaluates TS 3.4.6 and determines that reported DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-1 31 (0.0001 Ci /

gram) is within LCO specification of 5 0.2 Ci / gram.

EVALUATION / COMMENT SAT / UNSAT SAT / UNSAT

• CRITICAL STEP" Page 4 of 6

SRO TASK TITLE: DETERMINE PLANT CHEMISTRY TECH SPEC / TRM COMPLIANCE "3.

"4.

STEP Evaluate TRM 3.4.B to determine if reported CONDUCTIVITY parameter is in compliance with specifications.

Evaluate TRM 3.4.B to determine if reported CHLORIDE parameter is in compliance with specifications.

STANDARD Candidate evaluates TRM 3.4.8 and Table 3.4.8-1 and determines that reported CONDUCTIVITY concentration (6.1 mho / cm) is within TRO specification as referenced to Table 3.4.8-1, Applicability of "Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after exceeding 1 %

RTP during reactor startup" value of 1 1 0 mho / cm.

Candidate evaluates TRM 3.4.B and Table 3.4.B-1 and determines that reported CHLORIDE concentration (0.04 ppm) is within TRO specification as referenced to Table 3.4.B-1, Applicability of "Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after exceeding 1 % RTP during reactor startup" value of 5 0.1 ppm.

EVALUATOR: Terminate the task at this point.

Page 5 of 6

INITIATING CUE A Reactor Startup was initiated from Cold Shutdown conditions 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> ago. Reactor Power is just above 10%

CTP with power ascension in progress. Verbal notification of reactor water sample results received in Control Room, from Chemistry Technician, with the following parameters:

Dose Equivalent Iodine: 0.0001 Ci / gram Conductivity:

6.1 m h o I c m Chlorides:

0.04 ppm As the Control Room Supervisor, evaluate compliance with Technical Specifications and the TRM.

Page 6 of 6

m

-Entergv James A. FibPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Nuclear Northeast OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE SRO NEW TASK TITLE: EVALUATE ST-23C RESULTS APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV:

0 DATE:

4/21 /05 NRC K/A SYSTEM NUMBER: G2.1.25 2.8 / 3.1 JAF TASK NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME:

10 Minutes JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER:

SU BM ITTED :

OPERATION REVIEW:

APPROVED:

CANDIDATE NAME:

S.S. NUMBER:

JPM Completion:

(

) Simulated( X ) Performed Location:

( X ) Plant

( X ) Simulator DATE PERFORMED:

TIME TO COMPLETE:

Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:

(

) Satisfactory

(

) Unsatisfactory JPM DATA NEEDS TO BE VALIDATED IN THE SIMULATOR EVALUATOR:

SIGNATURE/PRINTED Page 1 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST SRO NEW TASK TITLE: EVALUATE ST-23C RESULTS APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update:

412 1 105 Date Outstanding Items:

Technical Review Questions and Answers Procedural Change Required By:

RWD Int.

Additional Information Validation X

None Comments:

Page 2 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATION SRO NEW TASK TITLE: EVALUATE ST-23C RESULTS APPL. TO JPM NUMBER I.

II.

111.

IV.

V.

VI.

SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A.

None REFERENCES A.

ST-23C, JET PUMP OPERABILITY TEST FOR TWO LOOP OPERATION (EPIC AVAILABLE),

Rev 21.

TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A.

None SET UP REQUIREMENTS A.

Mark up copy of ST-23C for a core flow less than 70% is attached.

EVALUATOR NOTES A.

If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and not actually performed.

B.

The candidate should, at a minimum, identify the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

TASK CONDITIONS A.

None

• - CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 6

SRO TASK TITLE: EVALUATE ST-23C RESULTS STEP STANDARD "1.

11.2.1 Candidate reviews ST and determines that all data is VII.

INITIATING CUE EVALUATION I COMMENT SAT / UNSAT Reactor Power is currently at 60%. The SNO has just completed ST-23C, Jet Pump Operability Test For Two Loop Operation (EPIC Available). Perform the Management SRO review.

2.

VIII.

TASK STANDARD

+ 8.4.2 is high out of tolerance for jet pump 17 SAT / UNSAT 11.2.2 There are no attachments required with this ST The candidate will review the supplied copy of a completed ST-23C. The candidate will determine that Level 1 Acceptance Criteria has not been satisfied for steps 8.3.2 and 8.4.2.

Candidate will review and determine that all required initials and signatures are contained Candidate will review the test and determine that SAT / UNSAT SAT / UNSAT Verify data is within required tolerances within required tolerances except:

+ 8.3.2 is low out of tolerance for the "6" Loop

• CRITICAL STEP*

3.

Verify data attachments, such as recorded printouts and calibration sheets are included as required 11.2.3 Verify required initials and signatures have been entered "4.

I 11.2.4 Review test to determine if test results satisfy acceptance criteria level 1 acceptance criteria 10.1.2 has NOT been met I for:

+ 8.3.2 is low out of tolerance for the "B" Loop I

• CRITICAL STEP*

I

+ 8.4.2 is high out of tolerance for jet pump 17 Page 4 of 6

SRO TASK TITLE: EVALUATE ST-23C RESULTS STEP I

STANDARD I

EVALUATION I COMMENT 11 11.2.5 IF level 1 acceptance criteria is not satisfied, THEN immediately notify Operations Manager or alternate.

Record name of person notified.

• 5.

6.

7.

'I Candidate will determine that Operations Management must be informed.

EVALUATOR NOTE Act as Operations Management and accept the reDort.

SAT / UNSAT

• CRITICAL STEP*

11.2.6 Initiate required corrective and comPensatorv actions.

Candidate will indicate that a CONDITION REPORT (CR) and a WORK ORDER REQUEST (WOR) will be necessarv.

SAT / UNSAT 11.2.7 Sian and record date and time Candidate will sign and record datehime.

II SAT / UNSAT II EVALUATOR: Terminate the task at this point.

Page 5 of 6

m "Entergy James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Nuclear Northeast OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE S/RO FROM LOI-01-01 TASK TITLE:

CTP HEAT BALANCE VERIFICATION APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV:

1 DATE:

3/3/05 NRC K/A SYSTEM NUMBER:

G2.1.7 3.7/4.4 JAF TASK NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME:

10 Minutes SUBMITTED:

OPERATION REVIEW:

APPROVED:

JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER: _ _ 1 _ - _ - _ - 1 _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " - - -

CANDIDATE NAME:

S.S. NUMBER:

JPM Completion:

(

) Simulated (X) Performed Location:

(

) Plant

( X ) Simulator DATE PERFORMED:

TIME TO COMPLETE:

Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:

(

) Satisfactory

(

) Unsatisfactory COMMENTS: (MANDATORY FOR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE)

EVALUATOR:

SIGNATURE/PRINT Page 1 of 7

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST S/RO FROM LOI-01-01 TASK TITLE:

CTP HEAT BALANCE VERIFICATION APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update:

3/3/05 Date By:

RWD Int.

Outstanding Items:

Technical Review Additional Information Questions and Answers Validation Procedural Change Required X

None Comments:

Page 2 of 7

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATION S/RO FROM LOI-01-01 TASK TITLE:

CTP HEAT BALANCE VERIFICATION APPL. TO JPM NUMBER

1.

SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A.

None II.

REFERENCES A.

RAP-7.3.03, Core Thermal Power Evaluation, Revision 1 1 111.

TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A.

None IV.

SET UP REQUIREMENTS A.

Lot-05-01 IC-1 38 B.

Simulator at 25% CTP.

C.

3D Monicore Computer functioning.

V.

EVALUATOR NOTES A.

If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and not actually performed.

B.

The candidate should, at a minimum, identify the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

VI.

TASK CONDITIONS A.

None

• - CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 7

I S/RO TASK TITLE:

CTP HEAT BALANCE VERIFICATION VII.

INITIATING CUE A reactor startup is in progress. Per OP-65, Step D.24.3, you have been directed to perform a Core Thermal Heat Balance Verification.

VIII.

TASK STANDARD The candidate will complete a CTP Heat Balance Verification per RAP-7.3.03

1.

2.

3.

4.

STEP Obtain and review procedure

a. Obtain Main Turbine First Stage Pressure

b. Calculate Reactor Power based upon Turbine First Stage Pressure

c. Obtain Core Thermal Power from 3D-Monicore computer.

STANDARD Candidate obtains and reviews OP-65 and RAP-7.3.03. Candidate determines that the start point is step 9.3 EVALUATOR Hand candidate a blank copy of RAP-7.3.03 At any EPIC terminal, candidate obtains a value of 144 psig from EPIC point 1299 and records on.

EVALUATOR NOTE:

Value is power dependent and should be 144 psig.

Candidate calculates a value for reactor power, using the formula on Attachment 2, without mathematical error.

EVALUATOR NOTE:

Verify, by calculation, that resulting value obtained by candidate is correct for input obtained in Step 2.

At 3D-Monicore Console candidate demands a Core Power and Flow Log function; and records correct value on Attachment 2.

EVALUATION / COMMENT SAT / UNSAT SAT / UNSAT

• CRITICAL STEP*

SAT / UNSAT

• CRITICAL STEP*

SAT / UNSAT

• CRITICAL STEP*

Page 4 of 7

STEP STANDARD EVALUATION / COMMENT Page 5 of 7

5.

d. Determine accuracy of the Heat Balance value.

Candidate determines that the 2 "% power" values recorded on Attachment 2 are within 5% of each other.

• CRITICAL STEP*

SAT / UNSAT

c a

a 9

a tu c

ro' n

CD 0

DATE/TIME:

A.

8.

C.

0.

E.

VERIFICATION OF CORE THERMAL HEAT BALANCE Page 1 of 1

/

First stage pressure from EPIC 1299:

Reactor power calculated from h e a t balance =

The two methods are within 5% of rated power of each other.

If N o t w i t h i n 5%, investigation initiated.

If GREATER THAZP 5%, and unexplained, General Manager Plant Operations notified.

Print sign Performed Bv:

% power

% power YES 0

NO 0 YES NO 0 YES D a t e Reviewed By:

REACTOR ENGINEERING SUPERINTENDENT

- This IS a Quality Record -

I RAP-7.3.03 CORE T H E W POWER EVALUATION ATTACHMENT 2 Rev. No.

11 Page -

12 of 15 Page 7 of 7

ISS "Entergy James A. FibPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Nuclear Northeast OPERATIONS TRAINING PROGRAMS JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PLAN IMPLEMENTATION FOR SCENARIO 3 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER REV:

0 DATE:

4/26/05 NRC K/A SYSTEM NUMBER: 2.4.41 4.1 JAF TASK NUMBER:

JAF QUAL STANDARD NUMBER:

ESTIMATED COMPLETION TIME:

15 Minutes CANDIDATE NAME:

S.S. NUMBER:

JPM Completion:

(

) Simulated

( X ) Performed Location:

(

Plant

( X Simulator DATE PERFORMED:

TIME TO COMPLETE:

Minutes PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:

(

1 Satisfactory

(

) Unsatisfactory EVALUATOR:

SIG NATURE/PRI NT Page 1 of 8

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE RECORD AND CHECKLIST SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PLAN IMPLEMENTATION FOR SCENARIO 3 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER Current Update:

4/26/05 Date By:

RWD Int.

Outstanding Items:

Technical Review Additional Information Questions and Answers Validation Procedural Change Required X

None Comments:

Page 2 of 8

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE REQUIRED TASK INFORMATION SRO NEW TASK TITLE: LOI-05-01 NRC EXAM E-PLAN IMPLEMENTATION FOR SCENARIO 3 APPL. TO JPM NUMBER I.

11.

111.

IV.

V.

VI.

SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS A.

None REFERENCES A.

B.

JAF Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures IAP-2, Rev. 25 Emergency Plan Implementation Checklist, IAP-1, Rev. 32 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT A.

None SET UP REQUIREMENTS A.

This JPM is completed as followup after the scenario progress has been frozen.

EVALUATOR NOTES A.

If performing JPM in the plant, inform the candidate that the conditions of each step need only be properly identified and not actually performed.

The candidate should, at a minimum, identify the change in equipment status light indication when equipment operation is simulated.

B.

TASK CONDITIONS A.

Scenario Terminated

• - CRITICAL STEP Page 3 of 8

VII.

INITIATING CUE Based on the events that have just occurred determine if the current circumstances warrant classification in accordance with the JAF Emergency Plan If classification is warranted, determine the appropriate classification level per IAP-2 and implement the Emergency Plan per IAP-1.

TASK STANDARD The candidate will evaluate the events and resulting plant conditions from the scenario, declare the E-plan emergency level using IAP-2,.1 and implement the emergency plan per the IAP-1 checklist.

I STEP 0 bt ai n/A p p r oac h IAP-2, Attachment Recognize the applicable conditions Confirm the conditions

3. I

• 4.

I Classify the event STANDARD Candidate obtains the procedure or approaches the posted attachment.

Candidate recognizes that the scenario events included a seismic event at >.08g.

Candidate reviews IAP-2 Technical Bases for expected declarations.

Candidate selects ALERT 8.4.4 Earthquake felt in plant based upon a consensus of control room operators on duty AND JAFNPP Seismic Activity Alarm (EPIC-A-124) actuated AND Confirmation of seismic event >.08g by I

NMP-2 I Candidate obtains IAP-1 Attachment 1 I

EVALUATION / COMMENT SAT / UNSAT I EVALUATOR NOTE If necessary, remind the candidate of the initiating cue implement the Emergency Plan per IAP-1 SAT / UNSAT SAT / UNSAT SAT / UNSAT

• CRITICAL STEP*

SAT / UNSAT Page 4 of 8

STEP A. Implement EAP-1.I, OFFSITE NOTIFICATIONS, in order to notify offsite agencies.

STANDARD Request a control room communications aid to report to the control room and commence obtaining Part 1 Notification data.

EVALUATOR NOTE Act as communications aid and acknowledge order to commence data collection.

Candidate determines that this step is not necessary as a General Emergency has not been declared.

B. If a General Emergency has been declared in accordance with IAP-2, CLASSIFICATION OF EMERGENCY CONDITIONS, then recommend protective actions in accordance with procedure EAP-4, DOSE ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS,, Initial Protective Actions.

EVALUATION / COMMENT SAT / UNSAT SAT / UNSAT Page 5 of 8

8 STEP C. Per EAP-1.1, notify security (ext.

3456) to activate pagers, and if necessary CAN.

Pagers should be activated at the NUE, and once again at the ALERT or higher classification if escalation from the NUE occurs.

Provide the following information:

1. This is: (1) an actual emergency, OR (2) a drill, OR ( 3 ) a pagedon-call test

2. Emergency Classification and time declared.

3.Activate Pagers YES NO

a. IF YES, provide 3 digit Pager Code

4. Activate CAN YES NO

5. Facilities activated:

a. "Group 1 'I for (CR/TSC/OSC /JAF) or

b. "Group 2 for (CR/TSC/OSC/JAF/EOF/J NC) or

c. Selected:

CR/TSC/OSC/JAF/EOF/JNC IF Security is unable to activate pagers and/or CAN, THEN the Shift Manager should utilize EAP-17, Attachment 4 to make the activation. CAN will call 31 5-349-6261 (located near RECS line) for verification of CAN activation. This is the only CR number authorized for CAN activation verification from the CR.

STANDARD Candidate contacts security (7001 in simulator) to activate pagers and CAN. Candidate provides the following information:

+ This is a (1) actual emergency or (2) drill.

+ Alert and time declared.

+ Activate pagers: YES

+ Pager code 1 or 2 2

+ Activate CAN: YES

+ Activate facilities Group 2.

EVALUATION / COMMENT SAT / UNSAT Page 6 of 8

~

9 10 STEP PAGER CODES 1 =Actual Event 2=Drill or Exercise 3=Pager/on-call test only 1 =NUE 2=Alert 3 =SAE 4 =GE 9 =None 1 = Report to CR/OSC/TSC 2 = Report to CR/OSC/TSC/EOF/JNC 3 = On duty only report to CR/OSC/TSC/EOF/JNC 7 = Personnel assigned a pager call 8 = All personnel report to EOF for further instructions 9 = No response required D. Activate emergency response facilities in accordance with the Facility Activation Requirements matrix in Section 4.1 CAN 800-205-51 75 STANDARD See item 8 above See item 8 above EVALUATION / COMMENT SAT / UNSAT SAT / UNSAT EVALUATOR: Terminate the task at this point.

I Page 7 of 8

INITIATING CUE Based on the events that have just occurred determine if the current circumstances warrant classification in accordance with the JAF Emergency Plan If classification is warranted, determine the appropriate classification level per IAP-2 and implement the Emergency Plan per IAP-I.

Page 8 of 8