ML051920069

U1R28 Today, Day 13

ML051920069
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	04/16/2004
From:	Nuclear Management Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2004-0282
Download: ML051920069 (2)

Text

-

16'- 1l7 to NuJ)r Excvgencs Comwmirad DAY IMW ~ -. q Point Beach Refueling Outage Edition ~J1E~rELLMnr PCIFIT

~ OF

• £flNC* BleId; 1

13 "I

<1;TODAY 0-S P I April 16, 2004 IrkX Accomplishments 1B RCP Safe Load Path Review by the Plant Operations Review Committee Schedule Focus AreaslPriorities

• Activities Required to Exit Yellow SSA Conditions o Troubleshoot & Repair Z-13 Polar Crane o Reactor Vessel Head Stud Removal o B RCP Motor Move o Install Cavity Seal Ring o Reactor Vessel Head Lift I Message from Outage Director On 4/15/04 an Auxiliary Operator making rounds in the Unit I Turbine Building was checking the 1HX-27 Bus Duct Cooler line up. During the Inspection it was hoted that the associated drain valves had caps installed. The Danger Tag hanging on these components specified that they were to be Uncapped and Open." This condition was In violation of the Danger Tag. The Work Control Center was Immediately notified and corrective action was taken remove the caps. A CAP was written to document the as-found condition' and the corrective action that was taken. The system had been previously drained and released for work and no safety hazard existed. To verify the extent of condition a walk down No OSHA Recordable Injuries. of all tagged vents and drains in the Turbine Building was conducted looking-for any other problems. No further problems were identified. The placement of the caps on the vent/drain connection Is being investigated as part of the ALAR l Last 24 Hours Outage to corrective action process.

ALARA ll 3.752 R I Use this as operating experience in future pre-job briefs when dealing with vents/drains/caps to stress the Importance of not Dose as of the end of Day 11. changing the position of Danger Tagged equipment W_ SE LCELL'EnE POlnT GERCH - UlRn8 Jnfprrrqatipn jn this record was. dieted. 8-D7

-. - .in accordance withbe aFreedom of Information.

Acte FEIA/O--0

April 16, 2004 OUTAGE GOALS NUCLEAR SAFETYGOL ATL PERFORMANCE -- _GAL_ ATUA HUMAN PERFORMANCE GOAL ACTUAL Unplanned orangelred paths None None Security'Violations;  : 12 loggable events I Reactor trips (either unit) None None Station human performance clock None I resets__ _ _ _ _ _

Safeguards actuation (either unit) None None Rework S11% <1%

Loss of shutdown cooling None None SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE __ _____ ____

Outage Duration Loss of Rx vessel level control None None (excludes extensions due to s 30 days Off Goal extended head or BMI Inspections) ______

INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Mod Implementation 100% of Rev 0 On goal PERFORMANCE ____

>85% schedule Lost time accidents None None Schedule Compliance compliance with Off Goal outage milestone _______

Personnel injuries (OSHA recordable) None None Emergent work (during :s2% late additions On Goal Implementation) :55% Emergent RADIOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE Scope Complete k 95% of On Goal Rev 0 scope _____

Radiation exposure (Excludes additional 100% of Scheduled dose from any head or BMI repair :s 75 R 23.752 R Operator Burdens Operator Burdens On Goal contingencies)______ complete ____

Personnel contaminations >5K CPMl Post Outage availability k 150 days of Available

_________________________continuous operation Post Outage Radiological events (defined as unplanned uptake wlassigned dose >10 mnrern or :s1 event I BUDGET PERFORMANCE Wihi -2%to 0%Of Challenged dose event based on ED alarms _____

I outage budget Radmaterlal event (defined as any rad :5 event 0 material outside RCA z 100 CPM) I_________

Safety Snippet Ashes to ashes, dust to dust; A clean workplace Is a must At Pi a couple of years ago during a refueling outage on Unit 1,welding sparks ignited asmall fire in some rags in containment. An alert fire watch was able to put out the fire imniediately but the fire was preventable with some very basic housekeeping practices.

Human Performance CONTACT INFORMATION Externial Confirmation: CAP 51472, Unexpected Rise in 'C1 Control Room Emergency - x291 I HUT during OPS Work plan Performance EMT Pager 6442 An Operator failed to verify parameters under his Work Control Center - x6703 responsibility (tank level monitoring) while performing aOC -x710-pto system alignment operation. Level rose from 26% to 46%.0C -x710-OtoI Proper verification would have prevented this event. Lessons Learned - x71 90 - Option 2 Plant Status - x7190 - Option 3 Operating Experience OE1 7973 - Configuration Control Event On 216162004 I&C Technicians were doing Preventive Maintenance on the 2A Feedwater Tempering Flowloop when they inadvertently disconnected the output air line from the 2C Flowloop. This resulted in an unplanned reactivity event when Unit 2 reactor power increased 0.1 %. The apparent cause of the event was a failure to use concurrent verification, flagging, and STAR. With one unit operating and one unit shut down, verification of the correct component Is paramount!

...................... ...... . .