ML051920014

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-Mail Gucwa, Entergy Nuclear Northeast, to Ennis, NRR, VY EPU Meeting Action Items
ML051920014
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 07/08/2005
From: Gucwa L
Entergy Nuclear Northeast
To: Richard Ennis
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML051920014 (3)


Text

RIc Ennis - Action Items from June 30_meeting Page1 From: "Gucwa, Len" <LGUCW90@entergy.com>

To: <rxeenrc.gov>

Date: 7/8/05 12:09PM

Subject:

Action Items from June 30 meeting Rick:

Here are the action items we took from the June 30 meeting.

GE has determined that this list does not contain proprietary information.

Len CC: "Nichols, Craig" <cnicho1@prod.entergy.com>, "Daflucas, Ronda"

<rdafluc@prod.entergy.com>

I c:\temp\GW}00001.TMP Pagqe Pane II l c:\temD\GWIOOOO1 .TMP Mail Envelope Properties (42CEA548.AC4 22: 43716)

Subject:

Action Items from June 30 meeting Creation Date: 7/8/05 12:09PM From: "Gucwa, Len" <LGUCW90(entergy.com>

Created By: LGUCW90(entergy.com Recipients nrc.gov owf4_po.0WFNDO RXE (Rick Ennis) prod.entergy.com rdafluc CC (Ronda Daflucas) cnicho 1 CC (Craig Nichols)

Post Office Route owvf4_po.OWFNDO nrc.gov prod.entergy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 150 07/08/05 12:09PM Action Items-050708.doc 27648 Mime.822 39805 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard

Enterpy VY Action Items from June 30. 2005 NRC Meeting on GE Methods o Provide a discussion of the fuel safety parameters of interest including rationale for inclusion and phenomena covered. Include a discussion of the reason why additional restriction/margin is/is not necessary for the following:

o MCPR (SLMCPR and OLMCPR) o LHGR o MAPLHGR o SDM o Stability o Exposure o Supersede the response to Reactor Systems Branch RAI #6 o Additional information will be provided on the following:

o CASMO Simulate

  • How it is used
  • Data for core follow
  • Validation data
  • Void fraction applicability o Neutron Monitoring System Noise from void creation high in core.

o Cold Critical Data from the BWR Fleet

  • Focus on cold critical data from plants with similar void fraction
  • Data for mid-cycle cold startups o Isotopics - Provide relevant aspects of the GE procedure for core burn evaluation o Specific discussion on ODYN conservatism versus TRACG o VY Steady State data on LHGR performance o Accuracy of TIP system
  • Progress from TIP measurements to pin power
  • Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) transport code runs o Conservatisms provided by SAFER (MAPLHGR) o VY reactivity anomaly Tech Spec and surveillance results, include Plant

'E' Cycle 10 discussion.

o Void reactivity effect for transients o Plant operational context (successful operation with greater than 70%

void fraction)