ML051890154

Written Examination Review Worksheet, ES-401-9 (Folder 2)

ML051890154
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	02/18/2005
From:	Mccall K AmerGen Energy Co
To:	D'Antonio J Operations Branch I
Conte R
References
Download: ML051890154 (9)

Text

ES-401 TMI Written Examination 4/05 - RO Questions Form ES-401-9 Written Examination Review Worksheet

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

Explanation Q# LOK (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia

1. /

Back-Q= SRO U H S Focus Dist.

Link units ward WA Only 100

ro-25 Instructions Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]

1.

Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.

2.

Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable)

3.

Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:

The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

One or more w i s t r a c t o r s is not credible.

One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).

The question is not linked to the job requirements (Le., the question has a valid WA but, as written, is not operational in content).

The question requires the recall of knowledge that IS too specific for the closed reference test mode (Le., it is not required to be known from memory).

The questjon contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

4.

Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

5.

6.

Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved WA and those that are desianated SRO-only (WA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

7.

At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.9.. how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-40 1 TMI Written Examination 4/05 Form ES-401-9 Written Examination Review Worksheet

=

x%

0 -

n

=

qs m =

P v) v)

Q#

7.

At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix E3 psychometric attributes are not being met).

1.

2.

3. Psychometric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws

5. Other

6.

7.

Explanation LOK (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia

1. /

Back-Q= SRO U I u s Focus Dist.

Link units ward WA Only NUREG-1021, Revision 9