|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML23117A3132023-04-12012 April 2023
Comment (1) E-mail Regarding Monticello SLR EIS Scoping
ML23117A3172023-04-0505 April 2023
Comment (2) E-mail Regarding Monticello SLR EIS Scoping
ML23110A6492023-03-23023 March 2023
Comment (1) of Bret Collier on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Northern States Power Companyminnesota; Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit 1
ML0706701012007-01-18018 January 2007
Comment (12) of John Linville Opposing the Re-Licensing of Vermont Yankee
ML0632000342006-11-0101 November 2006
Comment (1) of Kenneth A. Westlake on Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plant, Supplement 26; Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (Ceq No. 20060391)
ML0613705112006-05-0303 May 2006
Comment (4) of K. Westlake on Nrc'S Generic Environmental Impact. Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plant, Supplement 26: Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (Ceq No. 20060034)
ML0613200372006-05-0202 May 2006
Comment (3) of M. T. Chezik Re Monticello Nuclear Plant EIS for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, NUREG-1437, Draft Supplement 26
ML0612206192006-03-19019 March 2006
Comment (2) of Mark Lodermeier Opposing Relicensing of Monticello Nuclear Plant
ML0612206112006-03-19019 March 2006
Comment (1) of Dennis N Rykken in Favor of Making Full Utilization of Existing Monticello Xcell by Relicense
ML0534301212005-12-0202 December 2005
Comment (14) of Leonard L. Sueper on the Reactor Oversight Process
ML0522203812005-08-0202 August 2005
Comment (11) of Susu Jeffrey on Monticello EIS
ML0522203532005-08-0202 August 2005
Comment (15) of Carol A. Overland on Scope of Monticello EIS
ML0522203842005-08-0202 August 2005
Comment (13) of George Crocker on the Scope of the Monticello EIS
ML0522203822005-08-0202 August 2005
Comment (12) of Justin Eibenholzl Re Comments on EIS Scoping, Puc Docket 04-87-CON-Monticello
ML0522203872005-08-0101 August 2005
Comment (14) of Pat Sawatzke for Re-Licensing of Monticello Nuclear Power Plant
ML0522203782005-07-27027 July 2005
Comment (9) of Darrin Lahr on Xcel Energy Currently Seeking to Renew Operating License for Monticello Nuclear Power Plant
ML0518103302005-06-28028 June 2005
Comment (5) of Lynne Dahl-Fleming for Relicensing the Monticello Excel Energy Nuclear Power Plant
ML0518103272005-06-21021 June 2005
Comment (4) of Alan J. Loch on Behalf of Loch Jeweler'S in Support for the Renewal of the License of Xcel Energy Monticello Plant
ML0518103332005-06-20020 June 2005
Comment (6) of Susan Struckness on Behalf of the Monticello Chamber of Commerce Supporting the Re-Licensing of the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant
ML0400902562003-12-30030 December 2003
Comment (6) of Edward J. Weinkam, NMC, Regarding Draft Revision 9 of NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors.
2023-04-05
[Table view] |
Text
Chief, Rules and Directives Branch g Division of Administration Services Office of Administration E8 Mailstop T-6D59 m_
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 co ATTN: Federal Registrar June 2, 2005 Pg. 32381-32382 Al-- cry I am writing to express my support for the relicensing of the Montic' ExCel Energy Nuclear Power Plant. I have been a resident of Monticello for over forty years. During that time, I have had ample opportunity to see the impact of the plant in our community. This impact has been nothing but positive throughout that time. The plant has provided sfable good paying jobs for many people in the community and has aided the 6ommunity in this respect by bringing many people to Monticello for employment. A great number of these individuals have contributed much to the town in terms of leadership and volunteerism.
At the same time, the plant employees and management have worked very hard to maintain an excellent safety record and to communicate openly with the community about plans, processes and the challenges confronting the nuclear power industry.
Excel has made it a policy to aggressively seek to provide sponsorship for a great for a large number of community activities designed to make Monticello a cleaner, safer and better place to live. Their contribution to Monticello's tax base alone has also assisted many community residents by lowering property taxes.
Monticello's Excel Nuclear Plant has been an excellent neighbor and their track record and sense of community justifies the community's expression in support of their relicensing. Help us keep this valuable neighbor where it has proven that it belongs.
Lynne Dahl-Fleming Business Owner, DESIGN for PRINT [& Web!]
Telephone: 763-295-8100; Fax: 763-271-6192 OFFICE ADDRESS:
113 Locust Street, PO Box 1075 , Monticello, MN 55362 RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS:
2655 99th Street NE., Monticello, MN 55362 grand/
t g 2 of-Z@E; =r -32
