ML051570435

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Response to NRC Guidance Regarding Mitigation Strategies
ML051570435
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/2005
From: Richard Anderson
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
PY-CEI/NRR-2884L
Download: ML051570435 (2)


Text

FENOC Perry Nuclear Power Plant SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION 10 Center Road FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Perry Ohio 44081 Richard Anderson 440-280-5579 Vice President-Nuclear Fax: 440-280-8029 May 31, 2005 PY-CEI/N RR-2884L U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket Number 50-440 License Number NPF-58

SUBJECT:

Response to NRC Guidance Regarding Mitigation Strategies Ladies and Gentlemen:

The NRC issued Orders For Interim Safeguards and Security Compensatory Measures ('Order EA 026' or "ICM Order') dated February 25, 2002, for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP).

Order EA-02-026 imposed requirements on nuclear power plants licensed pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations.Section III.A of the Order required licensees to implement certain changes in physical security plans and safeguards contingency plans on an interim basis until final requirements were established. Among other requirements, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) was required to complete implementation of the requirements of Section l I.B.5.b. of Order EA-02-026 at PNPP by August 31, 2002.

Subsequently, the NRC issued Orders, dated April 29, 2003, Requiring Compliance with Revised Design Basis Threat for Operating Power Reactors ("Order EA-03-086' or 'DBT Order') and other security related Orders (collectively 'Orders") for the PNPP. In many ways, Order EA-03-086 complemented or superseded requirements the interim measures imposed by Order EA-02-026.

As required by Order EA-03-086, the plans for the above-mentioned licensed facility have been implemented. Subsequently, FENOC was requested to respond to the letter dated February 25, 2005, NRC Staff Guidance for Use in Achieving Satisfactory Compliance with February 25, 2002, Order Section B.5.b, ("NRC B.5.b. Guidance') by May 31, 2005, and to implement appropriate enhancement to current mitigation strategies by August 31, 2005. Specifically, nuclear power plant licensees were requested by, Developing Mitigating Strategies / Guidance for Nuclear Power Plants to Respond to Loss of Large Areas of the Plant in Accordance with B. 5.b of the February 25, 2002, Order (dated February 24, 2005) ("NRC B.5.b. Guidance'), to the February 25, 2005, letter to review the Areas of Consideration delineated in Attachment A to that Enclosure and evaluate additional considerations for potential inclusion in the licensees' mitigating strategies that licensees deemed appropriate in accordance to Attachment B to that Enclosure.

Subsequently, the Nuclear Energy Institute ("NEI"), in conjunction with the NEI Security Working Group, developed and issued guidance for licensee use ("NEI Guidance") to assist licensees in responding to the February 25, 2005, letter.

NOTE: ATTACHMENT 1 TO THIS LETTER CONTAINS "SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION" AND MUST BE PROTECTED ACCORDINGLY. UPON REMOVAL OF ATTACHMENT 1, THIS LETTER IS "DECONTROLLED" SSg5T SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION I

-SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION PY-CEI/NRR-2884L Page 2 of 2 As requested in the February 25, 2005, letter, FENOC has reviewed the information in Attachments A and B in accordance with the NEI Guidance and is hereby submitting, as a Safeguards Information attachment to this letter (Attachment 1), FENOC's evaluation of the information the NRC provided. reflects the results of a comprehensive and thorough review of the guidance and describes the considerations that FENOC either has already or intends to implement at PNPP by August 31, 2005.

The primary guiding principles used in the conduct of this evaluation were (1) whether or not equipment and resources were "readily available," and (2) if equipment is readily available, can it be effectively utilized in a licensee's mitigating strategy. FENOC considered "readily available" to mean that the equipment or resources was already licensee owned, under contract, or part of an existing Memorandum of Understanding. Further, even if equipment and resources are readily available, the second criterion is to ensure that the equipment can be used in a mitigating strategy in an effective manner. Even if the equipment is readily available, it is of no value if it cannot be effective in implementing the mitigating strategy.

In accordance with these principles, mitigative strategies are being implemented to address the NRC B.5.b. Guidance. These actions are considered to be commitments for that purpose and will be managed in accordance with FENOC's commitment management system. to this letter is the schedule that FENOC has developed for PNPP regarding the implementation of commitments resulting from the evaluations documented in Attachment 1.

If there are any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Gregory H. Halnon, Director Regulatory Affairs at 330-315-7500.

Very truly yours, Attachments:

1) Evaluation of NRC B.5.b Guidance for PNPP
2) Implementation Schedule for PNPP c: NRR Senior Project Manager (wlo attachments)

NRC Sr. Resident Inspector NRC Region IlIl Administrator SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION