ML051460298

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Assessment Meeting, Entergy Slides
ML051460298
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/10/2005
From: Leach D, Schwarz C
Entergy Operations
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML051460298 (27)


Text

1 Agenda

  • Overview Chris Schwarz
  • Plant Paul Rubin Performance
  • Corrective Action Jim Comiotes Program
  • Engineering Don Leach
  • Closing Chris Schwarz Ascent to Top Decile

2 Overview Chris Schwarz Site Vice President (Acting)

Ascent to Top Decile

3 Progress at IPEC

  • Good Operating Run for Both Units
  • Fewer Challenges for Operators
  • Improving Material Condition

4 Plant Performance Paul Rubin General Manager, Plant Operations (Acting)

Ascent to Top Decile

5 Plant Performance

  • Supervisory Effectiveness 105 IP2 120 IP3 100 100 95 80 90 60 85 40 80 20 75 0 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05
  • IP2 Capability Factor *IP3 Capability Factor Jan 04- Mar 05 Jan 04- Mar 05

6 Plant Performance

  • Work Management/ Work Control 120 100 IPEC 80 Corrective Maintenance 60 Backlog 40 Jan 04- Mar 05 20 0

Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05

7 Elective Maintenance

  • Work Management/ Work Control 3000 IPEC 2500 Elective Maintenance 2000 Backlog 1500 Jan 04- Mar 05 1000 500 0

Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05

8 Plant Performance

  • Work Management/Work Control 3

IP2 3 IP3 2.5 2.5 good good 2 2 1.5 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Operator Aggregate Operator Aggregate Index Index

9 Plant Performance

  • Industrial Safety/Human Performance Number of Recordable Injuries Recordable Injury Rate - YTD RIR Goal 6.00 IPEC 5.00 Recordable 4.00 Injury Rate 3.00 Jan 04- Mar 05 2.00 RIR = number of recordable 1.00 injuries/200,000 person-hours 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05

10 Plant Performance

  • Industrial Safety/Human Performance 0.2 0.18 IPEC 0.16 Human 0.14 Performance 0.12 Error Rate 0.1 0.08 Jan 04- Mar 05 0.06 0.04 HU error rate =

number human 0.02 performance 0 errors/10,000 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 work hours

11 Radiation Exposure

  • Industrial Safety/Human Performance Person-rem Collective Dose - YTD YTD Goal Person-rem Collective Dose - YTD YTD Goal 225 10 200 Jan 04- Mar 05 9 Jan 04- Mar 05 8

175 7

150 6

125 5

100 4

75 3

50 2

25 1 0 0 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 IP2 on line and outage IP3 on line exposure exposure

12 Plant Performance

  • Material Condition New HP Turbines New I&C Shop Safety Reliability Accountability Accountability

13 Corrective Action Program Jim Comiotes Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance Ascent to Top Decile

14 Corrective Action Program Station Improvements

  • Condition Report Backlog Reduction
  • Reduction in Significant Events and Higher Level Non-significant Events
  • Corrective Action Program Quality and Timeliness Improvement (Performance Index)

Ascent to Top Decile

15 5

-0 ar M

05 b-Condition Report Backlog Fe 05 n-Ja 04 c-De 04 v-No 04 ct-O 04 p-Se IPEC Open and Initiated Condition Reports 04 g-Au 4

l-0 Ascent to Top Decile Ju 04 n-Ju 04 CRs Initiated ay M

4 r- 0 Ap 4

-0 ar M

04 b-Reduction Fe 04 Month n-Ja Open CRs 03 c-De 03 v-No 03 ct-O 03 p-Se 03 g-Au 3

l-0 Ju 03 n-Ju

-03 ay M

3 r- 0 Ap 3

-0 ar M

03 b-Fe 03 n-Ja 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0

Number of CRs

16 Reduction in Significant Condition Reports IPEC CR Category Comparison 2003/2004 12000 10096 10000 8000 6025 2003 6000 4393 2004 4000 2786 2000 1219 668 38 15 0

CAT "A" CAT "B" CAT "C" CAT "D" Ascent to Top Decile

17 Corrective Action Program Performance Index IPEC CAP Index Overall Station Average Trend Chart 4.00 3.50 good 3.00 2.50 2.00 3.50 1.50 2.90 2.60 3.08 2.50 1.00 1.85 1.88 1.83 1.70 1.59 1.78 1.73 1.61 1.74 1.93 1.80 1.64 1.59 1.53 0.50 0.00 Sep-03 Oct -03 Nov-03 Dec-03 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Ascent to Top Decile

18 CURRENT STATUS - CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM

  • Improvements achieved in backlog reduction and significance of Condition Reports
  • Implementation consistency still requires attention

- Evaluation rigor

- Adequacy of troubleshooting techniques

  • Management oversight remains high

- Independent reviews

- Effectiveness reviews

- Self-assessments Ascent to Top Decile

19 Engineering Don Leach Director, Engineering Ascent to Top Decile

20 Engineering

  • Design Basis Initiative
  • Focus Areas Ascent to Top Decile

21 Design Basis Initiative Original Plan (original + new scope) Accelerated Plan Projection to Complete 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 84%

complete 4000 3000 2000 1000 0

2005 2006 2002 2003 2004 Ascent to Top Decile

22 Engineering Focus Areas

  • Technical Rigor
  • Troubleshooting
  • Condition Event Evaluation Ascent to Top Decile

23 Self-Evaluation

  • Root Cause Analyses
  • Industry Benchmarking
  • Independent Assessments and Feedback
  • Corrective Actions and Improvement Plan Ascent to Top Decile

Engineering Improvement Process Analyze Engineering Processes Re-enforce HU Tools Monitor Performance Implement New Tools/Barriers Use Accredited Training Program

25 Closing Remarks Chris Schwarz Site Vice President (Acting)

Ascent to Top Decile

26 Closing Remarks

  • In 2004, we focused on the key management and performance areas that would yield results
  • We have seen progress in all areas, but we recognize the need to continue improving
  • Entergy is committed to bringing IPEC up to top decile performance Ascent to Top Decile

27 Ascent to Top Decile