ML051400304
| ML051400304 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/12/2005 |
| From: | Tanya Smith Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| To: | Joshi R, Gerard van Noordennen Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co |
| References | |
| Download: ML051400304 (2) | |
Text
ITheodore Smith - Note on RHR pipe _ __Page 1 From: Theodore Smith To: Gerald P. Van Noordennen; Ravi Joshi Date: 5/12/05 10:51AM
Subject:
Note on RHR pipe Ravi and Gerry, I was not able to attend the teleconference discussing CY's RHR line status, but my understanding of the situation is as follows:
CY staff provided to NRC staff a draft "Overview of FSS on RHR Pipe" and a revision 1 of the Final Status Survey Plan for Survey Unit #0044, "Residual Heat Removal (RHR) Suction Line," and additional information about surveys of the containment sump end of the RHR line. NRC staff reviewed these documents and the RHR Pipe survey data contained within. NRC staff also discussed, by teleconference on May 11, 2005, technical issues related to the RHR Pipe FSS, in areas of the survey measurements; scaling factors for other radionuclides, including hard to detects; and dose modeling considerations. Also, NRC staff made field observations of a portion of the work on the initial attempt at the FSS of the RHR Pipe, during the NRC inspection of April 12-14, 2005.
NRC staff understands that CY plans to grout the RHR Pipe, potentially later today. NRC staff takes no position on the acceptability of CY proceding with grouting the RHR Pipe, and does not approve or disapprove that action. However, based on the data provided by CY and reviewed by staff, as well as staff observations during the April NRC inspection, the NRC staff has no objections at this time to the results of the RHR Pipe survey, and no specific objections to CY proceding with grouting.
Also, as discussed in the teleconference yesterday, CY procedes with grouting the RHR line at CY's risk.
The NRC staff notes the particular risk of proceding based on DCGLs that have not yet been approved by the NRC, which is still under review as a revision to CY's LTP.
Thanks for the cooperative manner in which this situation has been addressed.
Ted Smith, Project Manager US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Decommissioning Directorate CC: Bruce Watson; Duane Schmidt; Laurie Kauffman; Marie Miller
I1 c:\temp\GW)000081.TMP Page Page 1 1H1 c:\terncAGWlOOOOl .TMP Mail Envelope Properties (42836D6B.330: 20: 17339)
Subject:
Note 6n RHR pipe Creation Date: 5/12/05 10:51AM From: Theodore Smith Created By: TBSI @nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time CYAPCO.com Transferred 05/12/05 10:52AM Joshi (Ravi Joshi)
VanNoordennen (Gerald P. Van Noordennen) nrc.gov kpl-po.KPDO Delivered 05/12/05 10:51AM LAP CC (Laurie Kauffman) Opened 05/12/05 11:32AM MTM1 CC (Marie Miller) Opened 05/12/05 10:52AM nrc.gov twf4_po.TWFN_DO Delivered 05/12/05 10:51AM BAW1 CC (Bruce Watson) Opened 05/12/05 11:09AM DWS2 CC (Duane Schmidt) Opened 05/12/05 11:34AM Post Office Delivered Route CYAPCO.com kp Lpo.KPDO 05/12/05 10:51AM nrc.gov twf4_po.TWFNDO 05/12/05 10:51AM nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2785 05/12/05 10:51AM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened