ML051160129

Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)

ML051160129
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	02/17/2005
From:	Roy D Florida Power & Light Energy Seabrook
To:	Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
References
Download: ML051160129 (20)

Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Faciliv Date of Examination.

Initials Item Task Description a b' c#

1. a. Verify that the outline@) fit@)the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

W

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D . l of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. P

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~

I t h e r the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

I & I &I

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions. instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S and major transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U and mix of applicants in accordance with the evected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants' audH test@), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

TT

~ ~ ~

Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specMed on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums speded on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

cified on the form

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column .c'; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-201, Page 25 of 27

Enclosed please find a copy of original security agreement with original signatures (SIGNATURE (2) column) for Matt Forrest

. Scott Morrow Richard OConnor Per previous agreement these are forwarded to the Chief Examiner.

c

Note: Tom Hunt signature is a facsimile. Mr. Hunt is the Licensed Operator Initial Training Supervisor at FPLs St. Lucie plant and performed an ES-401-9 review of the written examination materials as part of the facility examination development.

Also please note that Scott Morrow, Richard OConnor, and Matt Forrest are all part of Operations Crew D that performed the exam validation. They are presently on vacation. By previous agreement with the Chief Examiner these individuals will sign a copy of the exam security agreement upon their return. This will then be forwarded to the Chief Examiner.

1. Pre-Exarnlnation 4-I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 1 3' fX as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have no been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administation, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, 1 am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indicationsor suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Exarnination To the best of my knowl d I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any Information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 31'[3"' . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB n n E I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE ,SIGNATU&(2) DATE NOTE

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement F o r m ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 1 3/

// of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have no been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. ,

2. Post-Examination To the best of my know1 g ,&lid not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of I

& . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (I), DATE SIGNATURE (21 DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 26 of 27

c 9

P

-+

1 d n o M e d g e thall hwe acquired speddhod knoMadge ahout h e NRC llmnsingexaminelms sheduled fa the week(s) ol 1 31 dz 8s ofbe date d m y signahwe. I agree h a t I will nul knobingly divrdge any Informetion&out hese examinatjorrs to any persons M!u have no been auhodzd by the NRC chlsf examher. I understandmall am nOlb h B u 4 WalImtO, or provide psrformance feedback lo h s e apflcants schedulerj to be d m i d s k y d them lioenang sxamlnatom (run this date una UInplBbCKh d elerninabn adnWstaLim. except 8s spedkdly noted below and athaidby h e NRC (e.q., a d q as a drnlletm boom opaalpr or cmmunimbr Is ac0epMle if tt-ts lndlvldual does no1seleci the frainlng oontrnt or p d d e trimlor indlmd feedback). Furlhemre, I am aware or the physlcal securitymeasuresw d requlrernenb (as daxlmenled In b e taclltty lkentae's procedures) and umlefsband Utat Violdon of h e mdibons d U1l6 iqreement may reault In cancdeth ollhe examlnatlms and/or an enforcementaction agalnst me w the faaily licename. I HAl bnmedlalelyrepatto faclllty rnanegmmtQ the NRC ctrielexamlnsranyindc@ons o(

wggesbne that exarrinalon sawrity m y have been corrqxonrised

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 I. Pre-Examl nation I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 1 3

+ ' as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have no been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knoA d I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 31'[3"' . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE /RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1 ) DATE .SIGNATU% (2) DATE NOTE

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement F o r m ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 1

// o( as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have no been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performancefeedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY - SIGNATURE (I), DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE ES-201,Page 26 of 27

Note: Tom Hunt signature is a facsimile. Mr. Hunt is the Licensed Operator Initial Training Supervisor at FPLs St. Lucie plant and performed an ES-401-9 review of the written examination materials as part of the facility examination development.

Also please note that Scott Morrow, Richard OConnor, and Matt Forrest are all part of Operations Crew D that performed the exam validation. They are presently on vacation. By previous agreement with the Chief Examiner these individuals will sign a copy of the exam security agreement upon their return. This will then be forwarded to the Chief Examiner.

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 rest Number: 2005 NRC Exam Initial I 1. General Criteria b' C#

a) The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance. safetv function distribution).

b) There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

c) The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicant's audit test(s).

(see Section D.l .a) d) Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

e) It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competentapplicants at the designated license level.

I 2. Walk-Through Criteria I a) Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

Initial conditions' Initiating cues References and tools, including associated procedures Reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-criticalby the facility licensee.

Operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

0 Detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature 0 System response and other examiner cues 0 Statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant 0 Criteria for successful completion of the task 0 Identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards 0 Restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable b) Ensure that any changes from the previously approved system and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-303-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g.,item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations)

SDecified on those forms and ES-201-2.

m I 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed NameEignature Date A

a) Author b) Facility Reviewer (*)

c) NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d) NRC Regional Supervisor ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Seabrook Date of Exam: Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 /314 Operating Test No: NRC 1/31/05 EXAM 2005 Qualitative Attributes Initials a C#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. PB

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. sp

3. Each event description consists of:

0 The point in the scenario when it is to be initiated 0 The malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event h 0 The symptomslcuesthat will be visible to the crew 0 The expected operator actions (by shift position) 0 The event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g.,pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. 6

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. 6

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensuratewith scenario objectives. w

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

IO. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. 4 cs

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit form along with the simulator scenarios. Yg

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. The level of difficulty IS appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d Actual Attributes 1.

2.

Total Malfunctions (5-8)

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 8161617 3131212 a

8,

3. Abnormal Events (2-4) I 3121212

4. Maior Transients (1-21 I 2111213

5. EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions (1-2) 2131213

6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 I 1 1212

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: SEABROOK Date of Exam: 1/31/05 Operating Test No: NRC Exam 2005 P

A E Scenarios P V 3 4 P E Crew Pc ition Crew Position T M L N B S A B 0 I I T 0 R T O T N C A I P O C P A T L M N Y U T P M E - -

t Rx 1 I*

1 I*

SRO-I a 4*

1. I1213 MAJ 3 2 2 2 1 1

1. I1315 I NOR 1 1 5 4 3 2

-NIA 2 1

1 NOR 1 I*

SRO-I 6 4 MAJ 3 2 TS -3 1

2 1

1 1 7 4*

3 2

-N/A 2 Instructions:

1. Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at the controls (ATC) and balance of plant (B0P)position.s; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.* Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 -for - 1 basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: SEABROOK Date of Exam: 1/31/05 Operating Test No: NRC EXAM 2005 E

V E M N I T N I

T M Y U P M Rx E - 1*

NOR 1*

SRO-I I/C 4*

1. 6 MAJ 2 RO TS Rx

- 2 1*

MI617 NOR 1*

I/C 4*

MAJ 2 TS 2 RX 1*

NOR I*

SRO-I I/C 4*

1. 4 MAJ 2 TS 2 P

Instructions:

1. Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at the controls (ATC)" and "balance of plant (B0P)"positions; Instant SRO's must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (K)malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.* Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 - for - 1 basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

I Author:

+#f Otj NRC Reviewer: I t/zq/: Q 1 -

• • Scenario #3 to be used on 3rdsimulator day to evaluate candidates at ATC. Surrogates will be used in other crew positions (US/BOP).

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: SEABROOK Date of Exam: 1/31/05 Operating Test No: NRC EXAM 2005 c

T Scenarios P V 1 2 I 3 ** 4 P E Crew Position Crew Position T M L N 0 I I T T N C A I A T L M N Y U T P M 1 1*

1 1*

MAJ TS RO RX 4*

2 NIA 2 1 I*

Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at the controls (ATC) and balance of plant (B0P)positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 - for - 1 basis.

Author:

NRC Reviewer: Nf

• • Scenario #3 to be used on 3rdsimulator day to evaluate candidates at ATC. Surrogates will be used in other crew positions (US/BOP).

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 I Facility: SEABROOK Date of Exam: 1/31/05 Operating Test No: NRC EXAM 2005 I p A V

1 I 2 Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at the controls (ATC) and balance of plant (B0P)positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.* Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 - for - 1 basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component m s should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the s competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer: F Note that this reflects our projected spare scenario only and is provided at the Lead Examiners request. Numbers do not reflect event number but rather actual number of event types/attributes.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Seabrook Date of Examination: 1/31/05 Operating Test No.:

2005 I Applicants I RO P SRO-I Competencies I Scenario I Scenario Scenario 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 3 InterpreVDiagnose Events and 1,3 2,3 24 Conditions 3,5 4 4,5 5,6 2,4 1,4 Comply With and Use of 12 Procedures (1) 4,5 2,4 1,4 Operate Control Boards (2)

I ;::II :::II :::

15 1,4 5,6 1,2 4,5 4 1,2 Communicate and Interact 1,3 1-3 2,3 1,2 1,2 1,2 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 6

Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) Ix Ix Ix x x x x x x Notes:

(1 1 Includes Technical Specification Compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer: && \,F

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Initial I Item Description a

1. Questions are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

2. a. NRC W A S are referenced for all questions.

b. Facilitv learnina obiectives are referenced as available.

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401

4. If more than four RO and two SRO questions are repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, the facility licensee's sampling process was random and systematic.

5. Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit examination was controlled as ind'cated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

cd The audit exam was systematically and randomly generated.

0 The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started.

0 The examinations were developed independently.

0 The licensee certifies there was no duplication.

0 Other (explain).

Bank I Modified I New

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from bank; at least 10 % new, 1 33/9 II 12/4 lI 30112 11 and the rest new or modified); enter the actual ROISRO-onlv auestion distributionls)at riaht.

I I I Memory

7. Between 50 and 60% of the questions on the RO exam are written at the comprehension/analysislevel; the 3519 40/16 SRO exam may exceed 60% if the randomly selected WAS support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO/SRO question distribution(s) at right

8. Referencedhandoutsprovided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9. Question content conforms with specific WA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are iustified.

I E

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.

I 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

I Date a) Author b) Facility Reviewer r) c) NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d) NRC Regional Supervisor ES-401, Page 29 of 33

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Qualitv Checklist Facility: ScL~brooks-k&t,& Date of Exam: I 0 5 Exam Level: RO/SRO Initials Item Description a b C

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading K 9 @

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented I(% @.2

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail i<a @*

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NameEignature Date

a. Grader

1) d. NRC Supervisor (*) __

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

Seabrook Station NRC Written Examination Seating Chart Metca1f SRO ct Hansen More Varga RO SRO RO McNally Keon Eldridge RO SRO RO Duval Dent Doody RO SRO RO Exam Proctor (Front of Room) 1 Door 1