ML050910256

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Tamu Nuclear Science Center 2004 Annual Report
ML050910256
Person / Time
Site: 05000128
Issue date: 03/23/2005
From: Reece W
Texas A&M Univ
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2005-0026
Download: ML050910256 (21)


Text

TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 3575 TAMU COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843-3575 NUCLEAR SCIENCE CENTER 979/845-7551 FAX 979/862-2667 March 23, 2005 2005-0026 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C 20555

Subject:

2004 Annual Report (NRC Facility License R-83)

To Whom It may Concern:

Enclosed please find the TAMU Nuclear Science Center 2004 Annual Report. If you have any questions regarding this, please feel free to call us at (979) 845-7551.

Sincerely,

-"" -

  • ai. At e Dr. W. D. Reece, Director Enclosure LV/jlg Xc: 2.11/Central File Annual Report 0----) D RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR MANKIND http:g/nsc.tamu.edu

Texas A&M University Nuclear Science Center 2004 Annual Report Nuclear Science Center Texas Engineering Experiment Station Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas.

Texas A&M University System Texas Engineering Experiment Station Nuclear Science Center 2004 Annual Report Facility Operating License R-83 1095 Nuclear Science Road College Station, Texas 77843-3575 March 2005

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 CONTENTS

1. Introduction ...................................... 4 1.1 Nuclear Science Center Staff..................................... 4
2. Reactor Utilization for 2004 ..................................... 6 2.1 TAMU Academic Support Program ..................................... 7 2.2 DOE University Reactor Sharing Program ..................................... 7 2.3 Commercial Activity and External Research ..................................... 7
3. Facility and Procedure Changes ..................................... 8 3.1 Facility Modifications ..................................... 8 3.2 Experiment Authorizations and Modifications ...................................... 8
4. Reactor Maintenance and Surveillance ................................. .. 8 4.1 Scheduled Maintenance ..................................... 8 4.2 Unscheduled Maintenance .............................. 9 4.3 Emergency Planning and Review ........................... 10 4.4 Unscheduled Shutdowns ........................... 10
5. Health Physics Surveillance ............................ 11 5.1 Radioactive Shipments ............................ 11 5.2 Personnel Monitoring ............................ 11 5.3 Facility Monitoring ............................ 11 5.4 Particulate Effluent Monitoring ............................ 12 5.5 Gaseous Effluent Monitoring ............................ 13 5.6 Liquid Effluent Monitoring ............................ 14
6. Environmental Monitoring ...................... 15 6.1 Environmental Samples ..................... 16 6.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate ..................... 16
7. Radioactive Waste Shipments ..................... 18
8. Reactor Safety Board ...................... 18 8.1 Reactor Safety Board Membership (2004) ............................ 18 2

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 List of Tables Table 2-1: Reactor Utilization Summary in 2004 .......................................... 6 Table 4-1: Unscheduled Maintenance .......................................... 9 Table 4-2: Unscheduled Shutdowns ......................................... 10 Table 5-1: Total Dose Equivalent (mrem) Recorded on Area Monitors ................................. 12 Table 5-2: Particulate Effluent Releases ......................................... 13 Table 5-3: Gaseous Effluent Releases ......................................... 14 Table 5-4: Liquid Effluent Releases ......................................... 15 Table 6-1: Environmental Sample Analysis ......................................... 16 Table 6-2: Site Boundary Dose Rates ......................................... 17 List of Figures Figure 1-1: Nuclear Science Center Organization Chart ............................... 5 Figure 2- 1: Annual Reactor Utilization ............................... 6 3

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004

1. Introduction The Texas A&M University Nuclear Science Center (NSC) is a multi-disciplinary research and education center supporting basic and applied research in nuclear related fields of science and technology as well as providing educational opportunities for students in these fields as a service to the Texas A&M University System and the state of Texas. The NSC also provides services to commercial ventures requiring radiation or isotope production services.

The NSC reactor, a 1-MW, pool-type TRIGA reactor, is at the heart of the NSC facilities which includes: a 2-MW micro-beam accelerator, a 60 Co gamma calibration range, a Cs-137 calibrator, a real-time neutron radiography facility, a large-object irradiation cell, hot cells and manipulators, radiation measurement laboratories, radiochemical laboratories, four HPGe gamma spectroscopy systems, and a variety of instruments for radiation detection and measurement.

The NSC reactor design allows for easy load/unload of various types of samples. The NSC actively produces various kinds of radioisotopes for industry, hospitals, and academic users. The NSC provides nationally recognized neutron activation analysis (NAA) services to many research and academic institutions in the United States. The NSC reactor also* actively supports the Nuclear Engineering Department on campus, the largest nuclear engineering programs in the United States. The NSC is one of the major attractions on campus. Last year alone, the NSC hosted 1164 visitors including: elementary, middle, high school, and college students, faculty members, clients, and national laboratory and industrial scientists and engineers. Through these tours, the NSC teaches people with widely varying backgrounds what nuclear power is, and what radiation is and a little about nuclear science.

With the strong support from the University, the NSC is continuously increasing the diversity of its facilities and services. The NSC is continuing to develop the third generation 124Xe irradiation system for 1251 NSC and the Nuclear Engineering Department are maintaining the Innovations in Nuclear Infrastructure for Education Grant. As part of this, the NSC is building a robust neutron detection system and is producing the prototype for distance learning modules. The NSC also refurbished the delayed neutron counting system and the neutron radiography system.

This annual report has been prepared to satisfy the reporting requirements of Technical Specification 6.6.1 of the facility operating license R-83 and of the Department of Energy University Reactor Fuel Assistance Program subcontract No C87-101594 (DE-AC07-76ER02426). The facility license renewal application was filed with NRC on February 2003. The facility is currently operating under timely renewal.

1.1 Nuclear Science Center Staff The staff at the Nuclear Science Center consists of four major groups: Reactor Operations, Reactor Maintenance, Health Physics/Technical Coordination, and Administrative Services (Figure 1-1). Personnel directly involved with the operation and maintenance of the reactor are 4.

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 NRC-licensed operators. The NSC is committed to its educational responsibilities and many members of the staff are part or full-time students at Texas A&M University.

Nuclear Science Center 2004 DR~eceae an; NACANzT!

iAssociateDieo _

Jim RemiTnger Tom Fisiw Latha Vasudevan Joy Ribardo Wen Hsing Hsu :I, Manager Supervisor Radiation Safety Officer Coordinator nusiness Engineering Researct Reactor operatio- Reactor Mainteance Health Physics Administrative Services Associate

'Jin Ka' WIn, lHPSup~ervisorI 1 GAR

YoungiiHosruLeel..

. Th-ad Srnith

ReactorSupervisor _ Iscientific nstrumenlI rDjtrn. IComuter SystentIj i.: Jaewon Jung

'GAR '! t 7)

SnirReactor Operator

. BiliiAsher ;4: Sti1minkle YorgChen Senia Reactor Operator 'GAR IG::-Bo ack Boninam Leinwe~er 1!,

ior Rea Operator Tehncan 1 I Aaron Heinrich ;j E UittShnel

, Student worker 11 IForemanI Senior Reactor Operator Studet ec John Hemnandez Student Workeer 11 _

- Reactor Operator Greg Schulze Student Worer 1111 Reactotr Operator Daniel Strohtmeyer

-Student Tech 11 _

Reactor Operator Jerry Newho~use Student Techtt1 _

Snior Reactor Operator Figure 1-1. Nuclear Science Center Organization Chart S

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 The Texas Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) of the Texas A&M University System operates the Nuclear Science Center (NSC). The Director of the Nuclear Science Center (NSC) is responsible to the Deputy Director of the TEES for the administration and the proper and safe operation of the facility. In addition to the internal structure, the Reactor Safety Board (RSB) advises the Deputy Director of the TEES and the Director of the NSC on issues or policy pertaining to reactor safety. The Texas A&M University Environmental Health and Safety Department (EHSD) provide assistance when it is required for emergencies and for special operations as agreed.

2. Reactor Utilization for 2004 The Nuclear Science Center (NSC) reactor has been in operation since 1962. The reactor is a I-MW, MTR-converted TRIGA reactor. The reactor uses highly enriched uranium fuel (70%), but will use a 20% enriched fuel core when DOE funds become available. Core VIII-A is the current core configuration and has been in use since March 1986. The NSC reactor is pulse operational and is pulsed up to powers of approximately 1,100 MW for nuclear engineering laboratories, staff training, and public tours.

The NSC reactor operated for 2107.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> in 2004 with a total integrated power of 86.7MW-days. There were 592 irradiations and services performed at the NSC during the reporting period. The NSC provided services to TAMU departments, other universities, research centers and secondary schools in and outside the state of Texas. Many departments at TAMU and other universities used the reactor regularly in the past year. The NSC reactor had about 97%

availability in 2004.

Table 2-1: Reactor Utilization Summary in 2004 Days of Reactor Operation 242 Integrated Power (MW-days) 86.7 Number of Hours at Steady-State 2107.7 Number of Pulses 52 Number of Reactor Irradiations (RFS) 592 Beam Port/Thermal Column Experiment Hours 996.3 Hours Irradiation Cell Use 8.93 Number of Visitors 1790 Unscheduled Shutdowns 8 6

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 2,200 ,0 120,2155 2,143 2082 2210 2 2,138 2,081

~2,100.1 0- 2,000 .1,944 1,9241,963 1,9421,9511,915 0

'~1,800-1,700-

'~1,600-Year Figure 2-1. Annual Reactor Utilization The cumulative total energy output since initial criticality is 3299.25 MW-days.

2.1 TAMU Academic Support Program Texas A&M University (TAMU) provides funding for the reactor for such academic activities as nuclear engineering laboratories, neutron activation analysis demonstrations and laboratories, graduate student thesis and dissertation research, and undergraduate research projects. The program has been very successful and is crucial for many graduate students who use the NSC reactor for research and have not received research grants. The wide range of academic users from the university reflects in the NSC's reputation as a multi-disciplinary institution.

2.2 DOE University Reactor Sharing Program The DOE University Reactor Sharing Program provides funds for reactor experimentation to those institutions that do not normally have access to a research reactor. The Nuclear Science Center (NSC) has participated in the program since 1980. During the 2003-2004-contract year, nine research institutions utilized the NSC with the support of the Reactor Sharing Program.

Additionally, the funding provided reactor tours and "hands-on" projects to many secondary schools. The research projects supported by the program include items such as dating geological material and producing high-current superconducting magnets. The funding gave several small colleges and universities the opportunity to use the NSC facilities for teaching courses in nuclear processes, specifically neutron activation analysis and gamma spectroscopy. The Reactor Sharing Program supported the use of the Fast Flux Irradiation Device for multiple users at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and the University of Nevada at Las Vegas. This device has near optimum neutron fluxes for 3 9Arf 0 Ar dating.

2.3 Commercial Activity and External Research 7

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 The NSC provides services to a variety of users who provide their own funding. The majority of commercial activities focus on production of radioactive tracers for the Texas petroleum and chemical industries. Another commercial activity uses the converted Thermal Column area to produce micropore filters used in ultra-pure water systems in the semiconductor industry.

Outside research grants fund a significant amount of the NSC's research. NSC is currently involved with neutron activation analysis and radioassays for a wide variety of samples for outside customers. The NSC has many years of experience producing radioisotopes-and has developed several customer-specific methods for radioactive sample production and handling.

The production of radioisotopes generally involves handling radioactive material with high activities. The NSC staff takes precautions to minimize their exposures during the transfer of radioactive materials to shipping shields.

3. Facility and Procedure Changes 3.1 Facility Modifications Motion detectors were installed throughout the containment building for increased security.

The lawnmower shed was converted to a lab which is currently used for radioactive waste sorting.

A new permanent access ladder was installed in tracks, over the irradiation cell, which is raised and lowered with an electric winch through the cell door.

3.2 Experiment Authorizations and Modifications There were no new experiment/modification authorizations initiated during the year 2004.

4. Reactor Maintenance and Surveillance 4.1 Scheduled Maintenance NSC personnel performed regular maintenance on the Fuel Element Temperature Channel, Area Radiation Monitors and the Linear, Log, and Safety Power Channels as required by the Technical Specifications. They also performed all surveillances required by the reactor license. Control rod worth and scram time measurements performed in August 2004 gave the following results. The total rod worth is $14.39. The most reactive control rod is Shim Safety #4 with a worth of $3.61.

The shutdown margin was $5.14 and core excess was $3.83. Scram times on all rods were less than 1.2 seconds. In addition, operators performed calorimetric calibration following each maintenance period, and fuel inspections with no abnormalities noted (as required by the Technical Specification). The cold critical reactivity worth, performed for each reactor experiment, shows the most reactive fixed experiment is the Fast Flux Pneumatic Receiver

(-$ 1.28) with leveling high boron loading the negative worth.

8

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 4.2 Unscheduled Maintenance Table 4-1: Unscheduled Maintenance 01-14-2004 A loose connection was repaired and a defective LED matrix was replaced in the secondary panel alarm that indicated the secondary pump status.

01-30-2004 New self contained float actuators replaced the old float ball switches, that were becoming unreliable, for the demineralizer room sump pumps 02-15-2004 The underground wiring for the front gate was replaced after gate control became erratic.

03-15-2004 The engaged switch for shim safety #2 was replaced after it failed to clear.

04-15-2004 The smoke detector in Lab 4 was replaced after causing several false alarms.

05-11-2004 The magnetic rod down switch for shim safety #3 was replaced after it failed to open.

09-27-2004 The 12 volt power supply was replaced after it failed not allowing the air handlers to be restarted.

10-07-2007 A shorted switch at the front gate was replaced after the gate failed to close.

10-15-2004 An electric air valve was replaced after the evacuation horn failed to be silenced from the reception room.

11-09-2004 The rod down switch for shim safety #4 was replaced after the controller failed to reset its indication.

11-10-2004 The control rod drive module, for shim safety #3, was repaired restoring correct indications 9

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center' Annual Report 2004 4.3 Emergency Planning and Review The Reactor Safety Board (RSB) completed their audits of the Emergency and Security plans in 2004. The Nuclear Science Center (NSC) staff and the RSB reviewed the NSC Security and Emergency Plans and audits at the November, 2004 board meeting. A successful facility wide emergency drill involving off-site participation was conducted on December 3, 2004. Two successful additional facility evacuation drills were conducted during the year. Due to continuing concerns with terrorism considerable review of the security plan was required during 2004 and a number of security improvements were made to the facility. A set of security compensatory security measures was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 2003 and was adopted in 2004.

4.4 Unscheduled Shutdowns There were eight unscheduled reactor shutdowns during 2004. The causes are detailed below:

Table 4-2: Unscheduled Shutdowns 5/18104, Reactor Scrammed due to high power circuitry in Safety Channel #2 while operating against the Thermal Column. Fuel temperature was observed to be normal.

6/15/04 (12:27) Reactor Scrammed due to loss of power from offsite.

6/15/04 (16:20) Reactor Scrammed due to loss of power from offsite.

6/21/04 Reactor Scrammed due to loss of power from offsite.

7/01/04 Reactor Scrammed due to loss of power from offsite.

7/02/04 Reactor Scrammed due to high power circuitry in Safety Channel #2 while operating against the Thermal Column. Fuel temperature was observed to be normal.

7/13/04 Reactor Scrammed-due to high power circuitry in Safety Channel #2 while operating against the Thermal Column. Fuel temperature was observed to be normal.

7/21/04 Reactor Scrammed due to high power circuitry in Safety Channel #2 while operating against the Thermal Column. Fuel temperature was observed to be normal.

10

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004

5. Health Physics Surveillance The purpose of Health Physics surveillance is to ensure safe use of radioactive materials in Nuclear Science Center's (NSC) research and service activities and to fulfill the regulatory '

requirements of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and State agencies. The NSC maintains a Health Physics group as an integral part of the organization. They are responsible for chemical and physical safety concerns as well as radiological. The TAMU Environmental Health and Safety Department provides additional support to the NSC Health Physics group upon request.

5.1 Radioactive Shipments The Health Physics monitoring and technical support that was provided in 2004 assured minimal exposure during sample handling, shipment of radioactive material, and normal reactor operation. The radiation exposures were maintained ALARA. During 2004, about 384 radioactive samples were handled of which 359 were sent to various research facilities including Texas A&M University campus and the rest retained at the Nuclear Science Center facility. A total of 399 curies were handled in 2004.

5.2 Personnel Monitoring Personnel Monitoring was provided to approximately 55 personnel. All measured doses to personnel were below the limits set forth in 10 CFR 20. Seven individuals received whole body dose greater than 10% of the annual limit inl 0 CFR 20. The doses recorded were 530, 792, 774, 507, 517, 957, 538 mrem deep dose equivalent for the year. Airborne monitoring during sample handling continued to show no significant airborne activity. Therefore, total effective dose equivalent will equal deep dose equivalent for 2004. A total of 9.24 manrem was recorded for all of 2004. When total manrem/curie was determined for 2004, the dose per curie equaled 0.023.

During 2004, about 1790 visitors toured the Nuclear Science Center. Minimal exposures were measured with pocket ion chambers worn by these visitors and the pocket ion chamber readings of their respective tour guides.

NSC employees who were likely to exceed 10% of their total annual dose wore TLDs/film badges and extremity dosimeters that were provided by Landauer, a NVLAP accredited supplier.

Landauer also provided the analysis reports of the doses received.

5.3 Facility Monitoring Surveys of the Nuclear Science Center facilities were performed to assess radiological hazards to NSC workers. Radiation levels and sources of radioactive contamination were routinely monitored. Approximately 350 smear samples were collected and evaluated each month. All accessible areas at the NSC are surveyed for radiation and contamination levels monthly. Areas where contamination is expected, access / egress controls are in place and are evaluated on 11

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 shorter intervals. Area monitors were placed at strategic locations in the reactor facility, this provides dose equivalent (mrem) on a monthly basis. The following table summarizes the annual accumulated dose equivalent (mrem) recorded on the area monitors for 2004.

Table 5-1: Total Dose Equivalent (mrem) Recorded on Area Monitors Monitor ID Location Accumulated Dose Equivalent (mrem)

BLDG MNTR 1 Upper Research Level 1519 Mezzanine BLDG MNTR 2 Lower Research Level 463 Mezzanine BLDG MNTR 3 Lower Research Level 107 AREA Control Room 167 AREA Upper Research Level 1106 AREA Room next to MHA 4036 5.4 Particulate Effluent Monitoring Radioactive particulates were monitored at the base of the central exhaust stack and summarized on a monthly basis. The annual average release concentration was 1.02 E-1 1gCi/cc and the diluted concentration was 5.09 E-14 pCi/cc. Total activity released for 2004 was 7.5E-4 Ci. The following table summarizes monthly particulate effluent releases during 2004.

12

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 Table 5-2: Particulate Effluent Releases Average Diluted Exhaust Total Release Cone. *1 Concentration*2 Volume*3 Release*4 Quarter Month (uCi/ec) (uCi/ee) (cc) (Ci)

I January 2.66E-1 1 1.33E-13 6.32E+12 1.68E-04 February 1.69E-11 8.43E-14 5.71E+12 9.63E-05 March 2.14E-1 1 1.07E-13 6.32E+12 1.35E-04 Average: 2.16E-11 1.08E-13 6.12E+12 1.33E-04 total: 1.82E+13 3.99E-04 II April <MDA <MDA 6.12E+12 <MDA May <MDA <MDA 6.32E+12 <MDA June 7.301E-12 3.65E-14 6.12E+12 4.47E-05 Average: 2.431E-12 1.22E-14 6.19E+12 4.47E-05 total: 1.86E+13 4.47E-05 III July 3.12E- 12 1.56E-14 6.32E+12 1.97E-05 August 2.31 E-11 1.16E-13 6.32E+12 1.46E-04 September <MDA <MDA 6.12E+12 <MDA Average: 8.75E-12 4.38E-14 6.25E+12 8.30E-05 total: 1.89E+13 1.66E-04 IV October 1.56E-11 7.79E-14 6.32E+12 9.86E-05 November 2.65E-12 1.33E-14 6.32E+12 1.68E-05 December 5.45E-12 2.73E-14 6.12E+12 3.34E-05 Average: 7.90E-12 3.9513-14 6.25E+12 4.96E-05 total: 1.88E+13 1.4913-04 Annual Average: 1.02E-11 5.09E-14 6.20E+12 6.32E-05 Summary total: 7.4413+13 7.59E-04 Notes:

1. Average Release Concentration data Form 805, Channel 1 " Activity Released
2. Diluted Concentration equal to Average Release Concentration multiplied by 0.005 (Technical Specification 3.5.2, dilution value for release concentration at exclusion boundary)
3. Exhaust Volume equal to: ( # days/month)*( 24hrs/day)*( 60minlhr)*( 5600cfm)/ 3.53E-Scfmlcc)
4. Total Release equal to:(Average Release Concentration)*( Exhaust volume)* (ICiY 1E6 uCi)

(MDA) is based on the conversion factor for the Stack particulate detector: 1E-13 ACi/cc 5.5 Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Argon-41 is the major gaseous effluent produced and released at the Nuclear Science Center.

This effluent is monitored at the central exhaust stack. Total Argon-41 released during 2004 was 9.18Ci wvith an annual average release concentration of 1.23E-07[tCi/cc and with a diluted concentration of 6.14E-10 pCi/cc.

The following table summarizes monthly gaseous effluent releases during 2004.

13

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 Table 5-3: Gaseous Effluent Releases Average Diluted Exhaust Total Release conc. *1 Concentration*2 Volume*3 Release*4 Quarter Month (uCi/cc) (uCi/cc) (cc) (Ci)

I January <MDA <MDA 6.32E+12 <MDA February 9.14E-08 4.57E-10 5.71 E+12 5.22E-01 March 1.43E-07 7.15E-10 6.32E+12 9.04E-01 Average: 7.81 E-08 3.91 E-10 6.12E+12 4.75E-01 total: 1.82E+13 1.43E+00 II April 2.35E-07 1.18E-09 6.12E+12 1.44E+O0 May 1.33E-08 6.67E-1 1 6.32E+12 8.43E-02 June 4.20E-08 2.10E-10 6.12E+12 2.57E-01 Average: 9.69E-08 4.85E-10 6.19E+12 5.94E-01

_ total: 1.86E+13 1.78E+00 III July 4.26E-07 2.13E-09 6.32E+12 2.69E+00 August 2.72E-07 1.36E-09 6.32E+12 1.72E+00 September 9.81 E-08 4.91 E-10 6.122E+12 6.OOE-01 Average: 2.65E-07 1.33E-09 6.25E+12 1.67E+00 total: 1.88E+13 5.01 E+00 IV October 7.80E-08 3.90E-1O 6.32E+12 4.93E-O1 November 2.31E-08 1.15E-10 6.12E+12 1.41E-01 December 5.17E-08 2.59E-10 6.32E+12 3.27E-O01 Average: 5.09E-08 2.55E-10 6.32E+12 3.20E-01 total: 1.88E+13 9.61E-01 Annual Average: 1.23E-07 6.14E-10 6.20E+12 7.65E-01 Summary total: 7.43E+13 9.18E+O0 Notes:

1. Average Release Concentration data Form 805, Channel 3 " Activity Released
2. Diluted Concentration equal to Average Release Concentration multiplied by 0.005 (Technical Specification 3.5.2, dilufion value for release concentration at exclusion boundary)
3. Exhaust Volume equal to: ( days/month)*( 24hrs/day)*( 60min/hr)*( 5000cfm)/ 3.53E-5cfm/cc)
4. Total Release equal to:(Average Release Concentration)*( Exhaust volume)* (ICi/ IE6 [tCi) 5.6 Liquid Effluent Monitoring Radioactive Liquid effluents are maintained in collection tanks before release from the confines of the Nuclear Science Center. Sample activity concentrations and isotope identifications were determined before each release. There were 22 releases in 2004, totaling 6.59E+5 gallons including dilution. The total radioactivity released was 1.27E-03 Ci with an annual average concentration of 5.09 E-07 pCi/cc.

Summaries of the release data are presented in the table below. Radioactivity concentrations for each 14

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 isotope found were below the Effluent Concentration limits specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B. Some of the major radionuclides identified in the waste stream are Mn54 , Sc4 6, Sb' 2 4 and Co6w.

Table 5-4: Liquid Effluent Releases Total Average Number of Volume Released Radioactivity Concentration Quarter Month Releases (cc) (Ci) (ACi/cc)

I January 1 6.38 E+07 4.66 E-05 7.30 E-07 February 2 2.67 E+08 1.58 E-04 5.92 E-07 March 1 7.82 E+07 1.18 E-04 1.51 E-06 QuarterTotal: 4 4.09 E+08 3.23 E-04 II April 1 1.20 E+08 2.83 E-05 2.35 E-07 May 1 1.27 E+08 3.19 E-05 2.51 E-07 June 4 5.22 E+08 2.46 E-04 4.71 E-07 QuarterTotal: 6 7.70 E+08 3.06 E-04 III July 3 3.16 E+08 1.53 E-04 4.84 E-07 August 3 3.08 E+08 2.52 E-04 8.19 E-07 September 3 2.60 E+08 8.76 E-05 3.38 E-07 QuarterTotal: 9 8.84 E+08 4.93 E-04 IV October 1 1.21 E+08 7.21 E-05 5.94 E-07 November December 2 3.12 E+08 7.73 E-05 2.48 E-07 Quarter Total: 3 4.34 E+08 1.49 E-04 Annual Total: 22 2.50 E+09 1.27 E-03 5.09 E-07 Summary

  • No releases
6. Environmental Monitoring In conjunction with representatives from the Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control, a quarterly environmental survey is conducted to insure compliance with federal regulations. This program consists of TLD monitors located at various locations on the NSC site and two background monitors one located at 3.84 miles NW of facility and the other at 0.25 miles SE of facility. The collection, analysis, and evaluation of NSC creek sediment are also included in the program.

15

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 6.1 Environmental Samples The environmental samples were collected in accordance with the schedules of the cooperative surveillance program between the Texas Department of Health and the Texas A&M University.

NSC creek sediment samples were analyzed using an intrinsic germanium detection system for isotopic identification at the NSC. A second set of sediment samples were analyzed by the Texas Department of Health for comparison.

The concentrations of environmental samples determined for each quarter are listed below.

Table 6-1: Environmental Sample Analysis Quarter Sediment tiCi/g 1st NSC creek' <7.6 E-06 2nd NSC creek <2.3 E-06 3rd NSC creek <3.0 E-05 4th NSC creek <4.8 E-05 6.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate The environmental survey program measures the integrated radiation exposures at the exclusion area boundaries. These measurements are made for periods of approximately 91 days using TLDs. Monthly measurements of direct gamma exposure rate in prem/h are also made at each of the TLD locations. The dosimeters are provided and processed by Texas Department of Health (TDH), Bureau of Radiation Control, Division of Environmental Programs Total TLD dose is multiplied by the occupancy factor (1/16) to determine total deep dose to the general public.

To determine internal exposure to individuals outside the site area the EPA's approved code COMPLY was used. The exposure calculated via COMPLY was 0.lmrem/yr. This exposure is added to the calculated total deep dose. This total is the dose received by the general public.

16

iU Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 Table 6-2: Site Boundary Dose Rates Site Location Quarterly Exposure Rate TLD Deep Internal Total Dose

  1. Dose Dose Dose (mrem)

.(mre1 days;) (mrem) (mrem) 2 300 R. W of 2.2 2.0 2.9 0.0 7.1 0.44 0.1 0.54 reactor building, near fence corner 3 250 ft W-SW 1.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.1 0.13 0.1 0.23 of reactor building, on SW chain link fence 4 200 ft NW of 4.3 5.0 6.7 1.0 17 1.06 0.1 1.16 reactor building, on chain link fence, near butane tank.

5 225 ft NE of 1.1 2.0 3.8 0.0 6.9 0.43 0.1 0.53 reactor building, on fence N of

-driveway . -

10 190 ft SE of 0.0 1.0 1.9 0.0 2.9 0.18 0.1 0.28 reactor building, near fence corner 11 300 ft NE of 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.06 0.1 0.16 reactor building, near fence corner 18 375 ftNEof 2.2 3.0 4.8 0.0 10 0.625 0.1 0.725 reactor building 17

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 19 320 ft NE of 0.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 3.9 0.24 0.1 0.34 reactor

_____ b u ild ing__ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

14 3.84 miles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 NW of facility _

23 0.25 miles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 SE of facility

7. RadioactiVe Waste Shipments During the year 2004 there was no solid waste released from the NSC for disposal offsite. But some solid waste stored for decay with short half-lives (<300 d) were segregated, sorted, and disposed as non-radioactive.
8. Reactor Safety Board The Reactor Safety Board is responsible for providing an independent review and audit of the safety aspects of the NSCR. The RSB meets at least once a year to review audit reports, security and emergency plans, new experiments and modifications to the facility.

8.1 Reactor Safety Board Membership (2004)

Chairman/Licensee:

Dr. David C. Hyland, Deputy Director Texas Engineering Experiment Station Members:

Dr. John Ford, Assistant Professor Nuclear Engineering Department Dr. Marvin Adams, Associate Professor Nuclear Engineering Department Dr. William Dennis James, Research Chemist Chemistry Department 18

Texas A&M University System Nuclear Science Center Annual Report 2004 Dr. John Hardy, Professor Physics Department Dr. Teruki Kamon, Professor Physics Department Ex-Officio Members:

Dr. Warren Reece, Director Nuclear Science Center Dr. Latha Vasudevan, NSC RSO Nuclear Science Center Dr. William Burchill, Professor and Head Nuclear Engineering Department Mr. John Salsman, Assistant Director/RSO Environmental Health and Safety Department Mr. Robert Berry, Reactor Supervisor AGN201, Nuclear Engineering Department 19