ML050690006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

G20040743 - Tim Judson Ltr. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. and Entergy Nuclear Fitzpatrick, LLC (Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant)
ML050690006
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick 
(DPR-059)
Issue date: 03/18/2005
From: Dyer J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Judson T
CNY Nuclear Security Coalition
Milano P, NRR/DLPM ,415-1457
Shared Package
ML050690009 List:
References
2.206, G20040743, TAC MC4975
Download: ML050690006 (6)


Text

March 18, 2005 Mr. Tim Judson Central New York Nuclear Security Coalition P.O. Box 3123 Oswego, NY 13126

Dear Mr. Judson:

On October 27, 2004, you filed a Petition on behalf of the Central New York Nuclear Security Coalition that was addressed to Mr. Luis Reyes, Executive Director for Operations of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Your Petition requested that the NRC take enforcement action against Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., the licensee for the James A.

FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (FitzPatrick). The Petition has been referred to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, pursuant to Section 2.206 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 2.206). In the Petition, you requested that NRC suspend the license to operate FitzPatrick pending completion of certain actions relating to safety-related pump rooms in the screenwell house. Specifically, you requested: (1) that physical tests of the ventilation and heatup rates of the pump rooms under simulated fire conditions be conducted, with verification of test results by an independent third party, followed by an open public meeting where the results are presented and reviewed; (2) that the floor/ceiling penetrations between the basement level pump rooms and the first floor be sealed; (3) that alternate cooling and ventilation be provided for emergency service water (ESW) and fire safety-related pump rooms; and (4) that the adequacy of completed actions be verified by NRC Region I Division of Reactor Safety fire protection inspection team, as the agency planned to do in 1997. You further stated that these actions are necessary for the licensee to complete commitments made by the New York Power Authority (NYPA, the former licensee) in Licensee Event Report (LER)91-021.

Aside from these immediate actions, you submitted a Demand for Information to obtain any documents that were not provided in response to a prior request from the Citizens Awareness Network under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

As the basis for your request, you stated that a number of different fire scenarios, whether accidentally or deliberately caused by acts of malice, could disable certain cooling water and fire safety-related pumps. In addition, you stated that, if the ventilation dampers close to prevent the spread of fires from room to room in the screenwell building, there is no alternative source of ventilation or cooling for the rooms housing the pumps. Further, you indicated that modifications made to the closing mechanisms for the dampers would cause the rooms to be at a higher temperature before the dampers close. Thus, you asserted that the rooms would be effectively preheated by the time the dampers close. As a result, you contend that the pumps could overheat in 10 minutes or less. Lastly, you stated that some of the basement pump rooms have open penetrations in the ceilings, covered only by grates. You indicated that these open penetrations make it possible for burning material to fall through and spread the fire between rooms.

You, and several other Petitioners, participated in a teleconference with our Petition Review Board (PRB) on December 7, 2004, to discuss your Petition. During this teleconference, you requested that documentation, provided independently by one of the Petitioners to the NRCs Office of the Inspector General (OIG), be included as a supplement to the Petition. The PRB

T. Judson

- 2 -

has considered the results of the December 7 discussion in its determination regarding your requested enforcement actions and whether or not the Petition, as supplemented, meets the criteria for consideration under 10 CFR 2.206.

In accordance with Section C(2) of Part II of NRC Management Directive 8.11, Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions, the NRC staff has concluded that your submittal does not meet the criteria for consideration under 10 CFR 2.206 because you have raised issues that have already been the subject of staff review and evaluation at FitzPatrick and that have already been resolved. In this regard, the staff found that you did not present any significant new information which would cause us to reconsider the prior resolution of the issues. Your issues had been previously reviewed and evaluated by the NRC staff under its Allegation Review Process. The following paragraphs summarize the actions that were previously taken to review the concerns addressed in your Petition.

The safety-related pump room ventilation issue was brought to our attention during a discrimination complaint filed with the NRC in 1997. It was one of over a dozen technical issues that were raised during the discrimination investigation process in 1997. The NRC referred the technical issues to NYPA for investigation. NYPA replied by letter dated September 16, 1997.

An NRC inspector performed an independent review of the issues to confirm the NYPA response and determine whether further NRC action was warranted. NRC considered the safety-related pump room ventilation issue closed after that review.

The pump room ventilation issue was again raised during a discrimination complaint filed with the Department of Labor (DOL) in 2003. An NRC regional fire protection specialist reviewed the Fitzpatrick Screenwell Smoke and Hot Gas Analysis that was referenced in a letter to the NRC on March 28, 1995 (ADAMS Legacy Library Accession No. 9503310022). This analysis had been performed for NYPA to determine if a postulated fire in the screenwell house which degraded or disabled the ventilation for the pump rooms, would cause the ESW, residual heat removal service water, or fire pumps to overheat. The analysis determined that with certain additional combustible controls for the screenwell house, pump performance would not be degraded, even with the loss of the ventilation systems during a postulated fire. The specialist also reviewed the combustible material control procedure to ensure that appropriate limits on amounts and placements of material had been incorporated in order to prevent a fire from adversely affecting the safety-related pump rooms. Another specialist inspected the screenwell house at that time to verify that combustible limits were being correctly implemented. NRC again considered the matter closed.

As part of the agencys Reactor Oversight Process, NRC resident inspectors make periodic tours of areas important to safety, evaluating combustible material controls, fire detection systems, fire area boundaries, and fire suppression equipment condition. During one of these tours, the resident inspector identified a quantity of material in the screenwell house in excess of that allowed by procedure. This resulted in a noncited violation in NRC Inspection Report No. 50-333/04-04, and the discrepant conditions were corrected (see ADAMS Accession No. ML043170428).

NRC recognizes that large conflagrations in certain plant areas, beyond those for which the facility fire protection systems are designed, have the capability to challenge plant safety. In response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, NRC has issued a series of advisories, orders, and regulatory issue summaries to enhance security, fire protection and emergency

T. Judson

- 3 -

planning programs industrywide. In particular, licensees have improved their capabilities to respond to an event that results in damage to large areas of a plant from explosions or fires.

The details are sensitive and not publicly available, but a general summary of NRCs activities in the security arena since September 11, 2001, is available at http//:www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/

doc-collections/fact-sheets/security-enhancements.html.

In summary, the NRC staff determined that the issues raised in your Petition have been thoroughly reviewed and resolved. In addition, you have not presented any significant new information which warrants a reconsideration of the issues. Therefore, the staff has concluded that your submittal does not meet the criteria for consideration under the 10 CFR 2.206 process.

With regard to your Demand for Information for documents not released in response to your previous FOIA request, we have determined that those documents were withheld under the provisions of 10 CFR 9.17 (a)(7), as you were informed at the time. We have reviewed the documents and determined that the exemption from disclosure still applies. As a result, those documents are not being released at this time.

In your Petition, you also asserted that NRC oversight was inadequate in that the NRC never followed up to ensure that NYPA fixed the problem. With regard to the potential safety problems reported to the NRC in an allegation, you stated that the NRC merely accepted NYPAs responses without question. Although we believe our actions have been appropriate and have adequately resolved the concerns through independent review of the issues, your comments and assertions about NRC staff performance have been referred to the NRCs OIG for consideration and appropriate action.

Thank you for bringing these issues to the attention of the NRC.

Sincerely,

/RA/

J. E. Dyer, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-333 cc: See next page

ML050690006 Incoming: ML043060348 Package: ML05069009 *by phone OFFICE PDI-1/PM PDI-1/LA TECH ED SPLB/SC DRS/R-I NSIR/DNS/RSS PDI-1/SC NAME PMilano SLittle*

PKleene SWeerakkody WLanning RRasmussen for SMorris RLaufer DATE 03/15/05 03/15/05 03/07/05 03/08/05 03/10/05 03/09/05 03/10 /05 OFFICE PDI/D PRB\\C DLPM/D OGC NRR/D NAME CHolden JLyons JLyons for LMarsh (NLO)

SLewis JDyer DATE 03/11/05 03/15/05 03/15 /05 03/15 /05 03/18/05

FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant cc:

Mr. Gary J. Taylor Chief Executive Officer Entergy Operations, Inc.

1340 Echelon Parkway Jackson, MS 39213 Mr. Michael R. Kansler President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. John T. Herron Sr. VP and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Theodore A. Sullivan Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant P.O. Box 110 Lycoming, NY 13093 Mr. Kevin J. Mulligan General Manager, Plant Operations Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant P.O. Box 110 Lycoming, NY 13093 Mr. Danny L. Pace Vice President, Engineering Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Brian OGrady Vice President, Operations Support Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. John F. McCann Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Resident Inspector's Office James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 136 Lycoming, NY 13093 Ms. Charlene D. Faison Manager, Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Michael J. Colomb Director of Oversight Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. William Maquire Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant P.O. Box 110 Lycoming, NY 13093 Mr. Andrew Halliday Manager, Regulatory Compliance Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant P.O. Box 110 Lycoming, NY 13093 Supervisor Town of Scriba Route 8, Box 382 Oswego, NY 13126

FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant cc:

Mr. Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Oswego County Administrator Mr. Steven Lyman 46 East Bridge Street Oswego, NY 13126 Mr. Peter R. Smith, President New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority 17 Columbia Circle Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. Paul Eddy New York State Dept. of Public Service 3 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223-1350 Mr. John M. Fulton Assistant General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Ken L. Graesser BWR SRC Consultant 38832 N. Ashley Drive Lake Villa, IL 60046 Mr. Jim Sniezek Nuclear Management Consultant 5486 Nithsdale Drive Salisbury, MD 21801 Mr. Ron Toole BWR SRC Consultant 1282 Valley of Lakes Box R-10 Hazelton, PA 18202 Ms. Stacey Lousteau Treasury Department Entergy Services, Inc.

639 Loyola Avenue Mail Stop L-ENT-15E New Orleans, LA 70113 Ms. Deb Katz, Executive Director Nuclear Security Coalition c/o Citizens Awareness Network P.O. Box 83 Shelburne Falls, MA 01370