ML050560266
| ML050560266 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 04/16/2004 |
| From: | Gody A Operations Branch IV |
| To: | Randolph G Union Electric Co |
| References | |
| 50-483/04-301 50-483/04-301 | |
| Download: ML050560266 (24) | |
Text
S 0
Q 0
v) a, 0
c L
a, m
a, S
O c
n -
P q -
c L! "!
Q v) a, S
v) v)
f 5
ob 0
S 0
a, v)
S 0
W a,
a, c
L e
.- h c
0 m
S 0
0 c
c 8
15 LL -
z 3
0 -
3 (3 -
m 0
W -.
7
-. z -
5 (3 -
d 0
7 7 -.
7 153 15 z
z z
3 3
3 0
0 0
3 3 3
( 3 0 (3
d d
d 7 - c o m
cu c
u cu Q
e Q.
7 7
i W
a, N
.- b 5
3 5
P S
a, t:
ob LL u
.- K a,
IT v) a, 3
a -
g g L
o(?
as II 0 -
z 3
0 3
(3 x -.
m cu Q! -
I TI a,
S v) v) r 0
Q a,
LI 0
a, TI a,
([I TI Q
3 v) a, a,
S
??
m
- y.
c
.- E w E a a
W LI X
W -
z 3
0 -
2 (3 -
d 0
d 7 -.
Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 ES-201 ltem
- 1.
w R
I T
T E
N Quality Checklist Date of Examination:
March 2004
-acility:
Callaway I
- 2.
S I
M
- 3.
W I
T
- 4.
G E
N E
R A
L
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.
- b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix o applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*,
and scenarios will not be repeated -on subsequent days.
- c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in A
- a. Verify that:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (2-3 for SRO-U) of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path
?jpf
- c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, $
- d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on s u e a s b e subsequent days.
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor
(*) Not applicable for NRC-(#) Independent NRC revi IUREG-1021 Draft Revision 9
ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-40136 Quality Checklist Facility:
Date of Exam:
Exam Level: ROlSRC I
Initial
- 5.
Question duplication from the license screeni indicated below (check the item that applies)
_. the audit exam was systematically and ra
-the licensee certifies that there is no dupli
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:
- The facility reviewers initialskignature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 30 of 34
ES-301 ODeratina Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility:
Date of Examination:
Operating T
- 1. GENERAL CRITERIA
- a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
\\
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s) (see Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test wtegews is within acceptable limits.
- b.
administered during this examination.
14
- c.
- d.
Section D.l.a).
.(
A
- e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA
- a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures 1
reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific performance criteria that include:
specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable r\\n m B
"I, I "
- c.
Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is \\
f within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.
At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.
- d.
- 3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA
- a.
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
/
PriNed Name bignature st Number:
Initials 7 I
I
-- I Date
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
NUREG-1021 Draft Revision 9
Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 ES-301 the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomskues that will be visible to the crew
- 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
301.
QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION I
NUREG-1021 Draft Revision 9
ES-30 1 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Scenario DS-1 REACTOR OPERATOR:
Applicant TY Pe RO Evol ut ion Minimum Type Number Reactivity I*
Normal I*
Instrument/
4*
Major 1
Component Scenario Number
- Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1021 Draft Revision 9
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Scenario DS-1 REACTOR OPERATOR:
Applicant Type RO Evolution Minimum Type Number Reactivity I*
Normal I*
Instrument/
4*
Major 1
Component Scenario Number
- Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-I021 Draft Revision 9
ES-30 1 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Scenario DS-1 UPGRADE SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR:
I, Evolution TY Pe Reactivity Normal Instrument/
Components Major Minimum Scenario Number Number I
2 Total O*
E 1
I*
C 1
2*
A/B/D/F/H/I/ J 7
1 G
1 Applicant Type SRO-U
- Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-I 021 Draft Revision 9
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Scenario DS-2 UPGRADE SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR:
B/C/D/F/G/H/I malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1021 Draft Revision 9
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Scenario INSTANT SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR:
I1 Position RO 1 SRO I BOP Applicant Type Evolution As RO SRO-I Minimum Scenario Number As SRO 1
2 Total Normal Instrument/
Component O*
A 1
2*
C/D/F/G/H/I 6
Major Reactivity Normal Instrument/
Com ponent Major Reactivity I
I* I 1
E 1
O*
E 1
I*
C 1
2*
A/B/D/F/H/I/J 7
1 G
1 I
I Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component nalfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
a Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-I021 Draft Revision 9
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Scenario DS-1 INSTANT SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR:
I.
Applicant Type Evolution Minimum Scenario Number 1
2 Total Type Number As RO SRO-I As SRO NUREG-I021 Draft Revision 9
ES-301 ComDetencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Competencies I nterpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control Boards (2)
Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
Applicants R1 -R3 Applicant (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
I n st ru ct ion s:
Circle the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evalua every applicable competency for every applicant.
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG 1021 Draft Revision 9
ES-301 ComDetencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Competencies InterpreUDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control Boards (2)
Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
I Applicant u3 Applicants UI-U2 Applicant ARI 3 -
CEI 2 -
ARI 3 -
4 -
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Circle the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
2
\\
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG 1021 Draft Revision 9
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Competencies InterpreVDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (I)
Operate Control Boards (2)
Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Applicant 1
Applicant I1 12-13 SCENARIO 11 SCENARIO 112 EF I
2/3 4 -
Applicants Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Circle the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
\\
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG 1021 Draft Revision 9
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:
Date of Exam:
Exam Level: RO/SRO I
Date
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
50f5 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
3 3
3 P
4 a
Z-U (0
z I
2 P
a Z-U
- 0) z I
E Q
L 2
E N
7 2
0 O
3 m
m d
d 3
0 0
3 0
0
" 0 N N
d 0
d I
3 0
0 N
3 0
r O
)
0 r
N 0
3 0
0.
7
? ! e
?, o.
P a
i U
cn Z I crj
-I W
a I
0 2
Y-o W
n d
0 d
0 0
0 N
10 a) m 0
0 0
?!
Q
?!
J a G G E m o w g 9 g
0 0
0 o
o m
0 0
6 B
d 0
0 0
N.
2 0
B
v) l-a
m C
0.-
c e
0 Q)
Q
I I
I I
I 1
i a
c I
z
\\
i 1
c 0
m
.L E
u;1 2 m
X Q
7 c
0 m
c m
X c
E w
c v) 0 a cn 7
hl 0
.r d
Z rn cv O
rn hl Y-
C 0
m 8
m X
+-
E Lfl c
v) 0 Q
ni I
I I
I I
/
/
I l
l
/
/
/
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I i
i i
i i
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l
/
l
/
l
/
I I
l
/
i i
i i
i i
i i
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
l l
/
/
I I
I I
I 1 l J
~
~
I
/
/
I
/
/
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I l
l l
l l
I I
I I
I in (u
I
'c 1
0 u?
I hl I I I
I I
1 I
I I I I
j I
l c r j w
1 c 0
Z
/
I l
l I
l l
/
I l
l 1
1
/
1 1
I l
l 1
I I
I I
I l
l 1
I l
l 1
I I
I I
1
/
1 1
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
/
I
/
I
/
/
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
I O
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
/
/
/
I l
l I
l l
I l
l I
l l
I l
l a
0