ML050550534

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Init Exam - 03/2004 - Public Forms
ML050550534
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 04/16/2004
From: Gody A
Operations Branch IV
To: Ridenoure R
Omaha Public Power District
References
50-285/04-301 50-285/04-301
Download: ML050550534 (28)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:v) c a, 0 z a, e a, Q 0 0 S .-c 0 .-Q L 0 v) a, 0 3 z 2

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: FOkj- CQ/ h 0 u V) Date of Examination: 3//2/6, 9 Initials Item Task Description I I Iw a b* c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit@)the appropriate model per ES-401.
b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I , Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all WA categories are appropriately sampled.

T T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. E I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)*, and scenarios will not be repeatedn- subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outiine(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
3. a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, I (3)* no tasks are duplicatedfrom the applicants audit test&), and T (4) no more than 80X of any operatingtest is taken directly from the licensees exam banks.

b. Veri& that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 48564 - 6 (2 - 3 for SRO-U) of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicants response to an emergencyor abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrativetopics are covered-I 4.
d. Determine if there are enough different outlinesto test the projected number and mix of applicantsand ensure that no items are duplicated on -ubsequent days.

G E N E R A L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. 9t w.7 &
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)

C. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor Note:
  • Not applicable for NRCdeveloped examinations.
             # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 24 of 25

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-36 Quality Checklist Facility: f O L. 7 Cq) bo Q fi Date of Exam: 3/aUO% Exam Level= I I Item Description a b*

1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility SL' h?JJ
2. a. NRC KlAs referenced for all questions
b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available ORS J questions are appropriate J
6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified): enter the actual RO I SRO-only 3713 1 I ()

question distribution(s) at right 3k1,5g

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory CIA the RO exam ' are written at the comprehensionlanalysis level: the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected WAS support the higher 90 12s 6Qb17.2 cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right
8. Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away answers
9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified IO. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines
11. The exam contains 3BB;the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet 3k @

Date

a. Author ________-_
b. Facility Reviewer (*) __________
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) ________________
d. NRC Regional Supervisor _____________--___

Note:

  • The facility reviewer's initialslsignatureare not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
            # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021. Draft Revision 9 30 of 34

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: FOW CMlhoue Date of Examination: 3 / 2 0 0 $ Operatin Test Number: II 1. GENERAL CRITERIA

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

C. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.l .a).

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test e&egwm is within acceptable limits.
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
2. WALK-THROUGH- CRITERIA
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
             . initial conditions
             . initiatingcues
             . references and tools, including associated procedures
             . reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
             . specific performance criteria that include:
                   - detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
                   -  system response and other examiner cues
                   -  statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
                   - criteria for successful completion of the task
                   - identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
                   - restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable b.

eb. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity. 6c. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

3. S I M U L A T O R W CRITERIA
a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a CODV is attached.

Date Author Facility Reviewerr) NRC Chief Examiner (#) NRC Supervisor NOTE:

  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
             # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 24 of 27

Facility: f% k 7 c4/huu&Date of Exam: 3/2c~+-Scenario Numbers: I Ia 1 3 Operating Test No.:

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
                                                                                                           , I I

I I

7. If time compressiontechniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are aiven.
8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

I I I I QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION 25 Qf 27 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-30 1 Transient and Event Che6klist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: A licant YYPe RO As SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1" As SRO 1nstrument/ 2" Component Wlaior 1 SRO-U Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.45.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. Rea 

                                                    )i           an3 I?arfilaiavalrrtions mag, ad&&-Jn& irtsk;umef;.:         pDf-jej.;g ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should require verifiable actions that provide insight ce count toward the minimum requirement. Author: NRC Reviewer: NUREG-I021, Draft Revision 9 26 of 27

f ' ~B ES-301 Transient and Eve'nt Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: As RO SRO-I As SRO instructions: (I) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section 0.456) but must be significant per 

                                                                       ~             jD 5 G i-         ~

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should quire verifiable actions that provide insight count toward the minimum requirement. Author: NRC Reviewer: NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 26 of 27

Zspo I ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: I A licant E lution J /Scenario Number Type YYW I / I instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-I event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controiled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.45.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. Reacf.ivity and riormaE 

                                                          +                                ~~~~~~~~~~      may k~

repiaced wifh addifi@nal ~~~~~~~~~~~ or cgrnponent; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 oi7.e- 

                      -one i-J&is.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should Author: NRC Reviewer: NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 26 of 27

TSfo L_ 2 Form ES-301-5 ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist OPERATING TEST NO.: Reactivity I* Normal 0 I As RO I strument/ component 2" 13 Maior 1 I r SRO-I I Reactivity 0 I Normal 1; 1' SRO-U E 1 strument/ omponent 2" Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or contro//ed abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.45.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. *' Reactivity and s-~orrnsi evoiutions may be 

                      !-ei;.iac& witis addj";'r$-$&ifisart&s&-$gor Gfi2=$i$g-'r&f$  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~             a an&.

ff-%r+pG 

                       *.l h-rir L Y UCd,.',J.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those ire verifiable actions that provide insight ount toward the minimum requirement. Author: NRC Reviewer: NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 26 of 27

t/SPoI f u-sf;, 2 ES-301 Trgnsient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Normal 1" RO I strumentI 4" Eomponent Major 1 1 A Normal 0 As RO 1 strument/ 2" Eomponent Major 1 1 I -nn' Reactivity 0 I Normal I" I SRO-U instrument Componen c ' 2 8 i Major 1 I Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type. (2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or contro/led abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.45.d) but must be significant per a of Appendix D.

  • Eeactivity acd fia ~~~~~~~~~~~  !-{ray 9 addiEiGn3fir",sPrumsrr%

Of' hjfr a fJ1 

                      " r --OiTE bssis.                        ~~~~~~~~~   ~~~~~~~~~~~

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should that provide insight requirement. Author: NRC Reviewer: NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 26 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Competencies - ARK 

                                             - 3 v
-:r;!erpret i Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (I)

Operate Control 3, 6 

                                        ?J 7

I, 3 6 Boards (2) - Communicate and 3,6 7 1/47 Interact-Demonstrate Supervisory a, 3 Ability (3) L Comply With and d Use Tech. Specs. (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. I Instructions: Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competenhy for every applicant. Author: NRC Reviewer: 27 of 27 NUREG-I021, Draft Revision 9

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist

5. All other failing examinations checke
6. Performance on missed que Date 5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist 5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

i w w i 1 i 1 I i n a I L T LT 3 3 z r I L L L LL L L L LL L L L LL 0 0 0 7 7 7 0 0 0 m m m B B B 0 N 0 N 0 N b og d 0 0 2 S 0 2 . 0 N N c u F -4 m 2 G i i E 

         .-d e g 0    0 8 m o w

0 0 S 7 S 3 3 0 0 0 r(d g & ld 0 0 0 r c! r 0 N 0 LL 0 LL L L L 0 0 0 

 -ld c   c ld c

ld I I I 0 0 0 I- I- k-O 0 0 B B B Y I? I? 0 0 N 3 3 3 2cn 2 B (0 (0 0 0 cu z 0 2cn 2cn C C a 3 D 0 E c m ? 0 Y

jj// 0, I i I i j I I I I I I I I li w 2 n I I I in N b 0 Lo N

m Y 5 m cv Y-O Lo cv -r 0 m c c 0 

      .Id m
      .-c E

E m m w X 4m 

!!?     0 IL     a

-r ni

I I I I I I I I I I cn I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l I I I I I I II I I I I ~ I II II II II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II II II II II I I I I II I I I I Lo N II Lc 0 II Lo N I I I K1 II m cn i1 z

cn:

W I I I fx I I I W 

          -I                     II t-t-                      I m

0 II 7 I K c W 0 .-0 -I-. m .-S 

    -I-.

m S 3 Z E E n m m W 42 4 

    -I-.

I-z a a 0 0 za , 4

KOSKE. JERRY E From: WEAVER, DAVID E Sent: Monday, March 29,2004 6:41 PM To : KOSKE, JERRY E

Subject:

RE: NRC Exam Security Agreement Jerry: To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered from 3/12/2004 - 3/18/2004 at Fort Calhoun Station. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations.

Thanks, David E. Weaver Supervisor - Operations and Technical Training Omaha Public Power District P.O. BOX550, FC-3-1 Fort Calhoun, NE 68023-0550 402-533-6056 (w) 402-533-61 15 (fax) 402-561-3799 (pager)
     -----Original Message-----

From: KOSKE, JERRY E Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:56 AM To: WEAVER, DAVID E; FERM, MICHAEL D; SWEENEY, DAVID 1 Subjed: NRC Exam Security Agreement Mike, Dave and Dave (not to be confused with Larry, Daryl and Daryl!) I need you to sign the second part of the NRC exam security agreement. I can sign for you (per e-mail), if you reply to this e-mail with a statement that you affirm the following: 

    "To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered from 3/12/2004 - 3/18/2004 at Fort Calhoun Station. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations."

Thanks Jerry Koske X 6073

NRC Exam security agreement Page 1 of 1 KOSKE, JERRY E From: Michael Krenisky [krenisky@cae.com] Sent: Monday, March 22,2004 1 : O l PM To : KOSKE, JERRY E

Subject:

RE: NRC Exam security agreement Hi Jerry, I have not to the best of my knowledge spoken to anyone regarding the NRC licensing examination per this e-mail. Mike 

      -----Original Message-----

From: KOSKE, JERRY E [maiIto:jkoske@oppd.com] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 11:48 AM To: bobj@CAE.COM; FERM, MICHAEL D; STELLA, ANTHONY M; SWEENEY, DAVID J; krenisky@CAE.COM

Subject:

NRC Exam security agreement I need you to sign the second part of the NRC exam security agreement. I can sign for you (per e-mail), if you reply to this e-mail with a statement that you affirm the following: 

      "To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered from 3/12/2004 - 3/18/2004 at Fort Calhoun Station. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these I icensing examinations."

Thanks Jerry Koske X 6073 3/22/2004

NRC Exam security agreement Page 1 of 1 KOSKE, JERRY E m m - * * - , P - p - - - - . m Pw 

                                         -m                                                   w
                                                                                              -m
                                                                                               ...                        ~         - "

From: Bob Johnston [bobj@cae.com] Sent: Monday, March 22,2004 12:21 PM To : KOSKE, JERRY E

Subject:

RE: NRC Exam security agreement

Jerry, ontreal and unable to physically sign the aggreement, I state that:

"To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations a d m ~ n i ~ ~ from e ~ e 3/12/2004 d - 3/18/2004 at Fort Calhoun Station. From the date that 1 ~ n t e r e dinto this security agreement until the completion of exam~nat~on a d ~ i n ~ s ~ r a t i Iodid n , not instruct, evaluate or provide performance feedback to those a plicants who were administered these licensing examina~ions." Please sign for me per this email Than k-You ~ o b e r R.t ~ohns~on 

         -----Original Message-----

From: KOSKE, JERRY E [1] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 11:48 AM To: bobj@CAE.COM; FERM, MICHAEL D; STELLA, ANTHONY M; SWEENEY, DAVID 1; krenisky@CAE.COM

Subject:

NRC Exam security agreement I need you to sign the second part of the NRC exam security agreement. I can sign for you (per e-mail), if you reply to this e-mail with a statement that you affirm the following: 

         "To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered from 3/12/2004 - 3/18/2004 at Fort Calhoun Station. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations."

Thanks Jerry Koske X 6073 3/22/2004

Page 1 of 1 KOSKE, JERRY E From: DAMME, TONY J Sent: Tuesday, March 23,2004 11:54 AM To : KOSKE, JERRY E

Subject:

RE: I will be back to work on April 2nd. If you need that signed before then, I do affirm the statements in this email. Thanks Tony 

      -----Original Message-----

From: KOSKE, JERRY E Sent: Mon 3/22/2004 1 1:07 AM To: DAMME, TONY J cc:

Subject:

Hi Tony I need you to sign the second part of the NRC exam security agreement. I can sign for you (per e-mail), if you reply to this e-mail with a statement that you affirm the following: 

      "To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered from 3/12/2004 - 3118/2004 at Fort Calhoun Station. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations."

Thanks Jerry Koske X 6073 312912004

KOSKE, JERRY E From: FERM, MICHAEL D Sent: Wednesday, March 31,2004 8 5 7 AM To: KOSKE, JERRY E

Subject:

RE: NRC Exam Security Agreement ike 

.s. Tony S t                   ated t h e exam as well.                    e h o sign
                                                                                  ~ the For
    -----Original Message-----

From: KOSKE, JERRY E Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:56 AM To: WEAVER, DAVID E; FERM, MICHAEL D; SWEENEY, DAVID J

Subject:

NRC Exam Security Agreement Mike, Dave and Dave (not to be confused with Larry, Daryl and Daryl!) I need you to sign the second part of the NRC exam security agreement. I can sign for you (per e-mail), if you reply to this e-mail with a statement that you affirm the following: 

   "To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered from 3/12/2004 - 3/18/2004 at Fort Calhoun Station. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations."

Thanks Jerry Koske X 6073 1

KOSKE. JERRY E From: STELLA, ANTHONY M Sent: Wednesday, March 24,2004 8:18 PM To: KOSKE, JERRY E

Subject:

RE: NRC Exam security agreement Jerry I agree with the security statement and you can sign for me. Thanks Tony 

     -----Original Message-----

From: KOSKE, JERRY E Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 10:48 AM To: 'bobj@cae.com'; FERM, MICHAEL D; STELLA, ANTHONY M; SWEENEY, DAVID -1; 'krenisky@cae.com'

Subject:

NRC Exam security agreement I need you to sign the second part of the NRC exam security agreement. I can sign for you (per e-mail), if you reply to this e-mail with a statement that you affirm the following: 

   "To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered from 3/12/2004 - 3/18/2004 at Fort Calhoun Station. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations."

Thanks Jerry Koske X 6073 1

KOSKE, JERRY E From: SWEENEY, DAVID J Sent: Wednesday, March 31,2004 7:42 AM To: KOSKE, JERRY E

Subject:

RE: NRC Exam Security Agreement I agree with the § ~ a ~ ~ .~ .. Please . for me e ~ t .sign

Thanks, Dave
     -----Original Message-----

From: KOSKE, JERRY E Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:56 AM To: WEAVER, DAVID E; FERM, MICHAEL D; SWEENEY, DAVID J

Subject:

NRC Exam Security Agreement Mike, Dave and Dave (not to be confused with Larry, Daryl and Daryl!) I need you to sign the second part of the NRC exam security agreement. I can sign for you (per e-mail), if you reply to this e-mail with a statement that you affirm the following: 

    "To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered from 3/12/2004 - 3/18/2004 at Fort Calhoun Station. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations."

Thanks Jerry Koske X 6073 1}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML050550534&oldid=2595773"