ML050450442
| ML050450442 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 02/04/2005 |
| From: | Roush K Susquehanna |
| To: | Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB |
| Cont R | |
| References | |
| ES-201-1 | |
| Download: ML050450442 (9) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Date of Examination: G&
4 dh$$
1
/ NRC (circleone)
Target Chief Date*
Task Description (Reference)
Examiner's Initials
-180
-120
- 2.
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
- 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (C.l.a; C.2.a and b)
-30 1 9.
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202)
-14
-14
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.9
-14 1 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
I
-7
- 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
- 14. Final applications reviewed; examination approval and waiver letters sent
-7 I (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-204)
-7
- 15. Proctoringhvritten exam administration guidelines reviewed
-7
- 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions with facility licensee (C.3.k) distributed to NRC examiners ((2.34 t
Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification le They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordi with the facility licensee.
Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.
[ ]
ES-201, Page 24 of 27
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 L--
Facilitv: SSES Date of Examination: 02/03/05 Item
- 1.
W R
I T
T E
N
- 2.
S I
M
- 3.
W I
T Task Description
- a. Verify that the outline(s) fit@) the appropriate model per ES-401.
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with
- c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected WA statements are appropriate.
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications and major transients.
Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all WA categories are appropriately sampled.
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
among the safety functions as specified on the form.
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified.
Printed Name I Sianature Date
- a. Author i 1 / 1 5 / & 4
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 2004 NRC RE-Exam Rev. 0 Susquehanna Facsimile 1
Memomdm To:
John Caruso From: Rich Brooks Date: 2/7/2005 Re:
Exam Security Agreement Attached please find the completed Examination Security Agreement (Form ES-201-3) for our recently completed retake exam. If you have any questions or require additional information, feel free to contact me @ 570-542-1 891.
1
ES-201 Examination Secuni, geement Form ES-20
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of //3/2Wg as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination S U S $ 4 4 4 0 4 4 I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Susquehanna Facsimile
ES-201 (\\
Examination Sewn(,
.geement Form ES-20
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of / / 3 q Q e as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of IlS//-%d5. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY 2-V- or 2-3-05 NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Susquehanna Facsimile
ES-301 ODeratinn Test Qualitv Checklist Form ES-301-3
- 1. GENERAL CRITERIA Initials I
I
- a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
- b.
C.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants= audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).
f I
- d.
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
- a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions initiating cues reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
- operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
references and tools, including associated procedures
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task reviously approved systems and administrative walk-through ve not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified ts (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Printed Name I Signature Date RC Chief Examiner (
- d. NRC Supervisor U
NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
?-,
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: SSES Date of Exam:
02/03/05 Scenario Numbers: 502A 1503N302A Operating Test No.:
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials l
a I
b*
- 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without
- 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any
- 10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 C#
5 k
Y-yh E
\\---, 7.
Critical tasks (2-3) 31212
ES-30 1 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 CREW POSITION A
P CREW POSITION Date of Exam 02/03/05 Operating Test No M
I N
I M
U Scenarios ILO-302 B/U I
4 I
I ILO-502A I
ILO-503A i---
\\--
Rx NOR RO a SRO-U RO SRO-I SRO-U I/C MAJ TS Rx NOR I/C MAJ TS Rx NOR RO SRO-I SRO-U I/C MAJ TS Rx NOR RO SRO-I SRO-U I/C MAJ TS Instructions:
- 1.
Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per section C.2.a of Appendix D. *Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a I
-for-I basis.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirement.
- 2.
- 3.
\\
NRC Reviewer:
L NUREG-I 021, Revision 9 2005 NRC RE-Exam Rev. 2 Susquehanna Facsimile
ES-30 1 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 2
3 4
Faci I i t y:
SSES Date of Examination :
02/03/05 Operating Test No.:
1 2
3 4
APPLICANTS ROIS RO-IISRO-U Competencies 502A SRO I n te r p ret/Diag nosi s Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control Boards (2)
Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 3,4 SCENARIO 11 SCENARIO Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
RO/SRO-IIS RO-U SCENARIO Instructions: @- flp; Circle the applicant's evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 2005 NRC RE-Exam Rev. 2 Susquehanna Facsimile