|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARNRC-2014-0257, Comment (3) of Katherine Mendez on PRM-50-109, Improved Identification Techniques Against Alkali-Silica Reaction Concrete Degradation at Nuclear Power Plants2015-01-24024 January 2015
Comment (3) of Katherine Mendez on PRM-50-109, Improved Identification Techniques Against Alkali-Silica Reaction Concrete Degradation at Nuclear Power Plants
ML15026A3382015-01-16016 January 2015
Comment (2) of Lynne Mason on PRM-50-109, Improved Identification Techniques Against Alkali-Silica Reaction Concrete Degradation at Nuclear Power Plants
ML15026A3392015-01-12012 January 2015
Comment (1) from Josephine Donovan Regarding PRM-50-109, Improved Identification Techniques Against Alkali-Silica Reaction Concrete Degradation at Nuclear Power Plants
ML12122A1062012-04-30030 April 2012
Comment (19) of William R. Harris on Behalf of Foundation for Resilient Sociieties Regarding Station Blackout
ML1125211062011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 ESBWR Design Certification Amendment
ML1125210392011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment
NRC-2010-0135, Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment2011-09-0909 September 2011
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-11-05) Regarding Pr 52 AP1000 Design Certification Amendment
NRC-2010-0291, Comment (1) of Mark Strauch, Earth Day Commitment/Friends of the Coast Et. Al. PRM-54-6 Regarding Request to Amends Its Regulations on 10 CFR 54.172010-10-25025 October 2010
Comment (1) of Mark Strauch, Earth Day Commitment/Friends of the Coast Et. Al. PRM-54-6 Regarding Request to Amends Its Regulations on 10 CFR 54.17
ML1020700442010-07-22022 July 2010
Comment (6) of Scott Boggs, on Behalf of Nextera Energy, on Proposed Rule PR-50, Regarding American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Codes and New and Revised ASME Code Cases
L-2009-230, 2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations2009-10-19019 October 2009
2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations
ML0929406172009-10-19019 October 2009
2009/10/19-Comment (41) of Mchenry Cornell on Behalf of Florida Power & Light Co., on Proposed Rules PR-50 & PR-52, Re Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations
ML0615600232006-05-26026 May 2006
Comment (13) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Company, J. A. Stall on Proposed Rules PR-1, 2, 10, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 72, 73, 75, 95, 140, 170 and 171 Re Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants
ML0614600392006-05-25025 May 2006
Comment (1) Submitted by Thomas G. Haynes, on Proposed Rule PR-72, Regarding List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: NUHOMS-HD Addition
L-2006-076, Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power and Light Company, J.A. Stall on Proposed Rule PR-50, Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Technical Requirements2006-03-15015 March 2006
Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power and Light Company, J.A. Stall on Proposed Rule PR-50, Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Technical Requirements
L-2005-266, Comment (71) Submitted by Florida Pwr & Light Co. and FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs2005-12-27027 December 2005
Comment (71) Submitted by Florida Pwr & Light Co. and FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs
ML0504004022005-01-20020 January 2005
Comment (241) Submitted by Kristie Conrad Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-12, Upgrade the Design Basis Threat Regulations
L-2003-115, Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Co., J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 20032003-05-0202 May 2003
Comment (14) Submitted by Florida Power & Light Co., J. A. Stall, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & 171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2003
ML0230300082002-10-18018 October 2002
Comment (9) Submitted by North Atlantic Energy Service Corporation, James M. Peschel, on Proposed Rule PR-50 and PR-52 Re Combustile Gas Control in Containment
ML0211200892002-03-29029 March 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on Draft Regulatory Guides DG-1091 & DG-1112 for Seabrook Station
ML0203100362002-01-25025 January 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Nrc'S Enforcement Program 66 Fed. Reg. 64890, December 14, 2001 from North Atlantic
2015-01-24
[Table view] |
Text
ECY
_ -. EC.Y, In .UDr of
.n SUDDort o:- the th DBG DB rulemaking rue-kn Detition oetit- -d ~Page I_11
-I I D0OWOEffi
-M a From: Kristie Conrad <kaconrad3@yahoo.com> ll To: <SECY~nrc.gov>
Date: Thu, Jan 20, 2005 8:25 PM
Subject:
In support of the DBG rulemaking petition February 3, 2005 (11:53am)
I understand that you are accepting comments on the Petition for Rulemaking by the Committee to Bridge the OFFICE OF SECRETARY Gap (CBG) to upgrade protections against terrorist RULEMAKINGS AND attacks on nuclear facilities. ADJUDICATIONS STAFF As a resident of Hampton, NH, I live within the 2 mile radius of the Seabrook Nuclear Plant. I am very concerned for the safety of my 3 children and for children in the 8 schools within 5 miles of that plant.
We have recently been made aware of a specific threat aimed at the Seabrook Nuclear Plant by suspected terroristsu and live daily in the plant's shadow.
We are In the path of several airports from Maine to Massachusetts and need to see that the federal government Is doing its job in protecting us to the best of its ability.
The CBG proposal would do two things. First, it would require protection of nuclear facilities against air attack.
The second component of the Rulemaking Petition is to upgrade the Design Basis Threat (DBT) regulations to require protection against at least the number and capabilities of the attackers on 9/11.
I ask that the DBG rulemaking petition be adopted, as a first step in upgrading protection of the people living around nuclear plants throughout our country.
Sincerely, Kristie Conrad 395 Winnacunnet Road Hampton, NH 03842 Do you Yahool?
Yahool Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
-T"empi - -61 tSECY16 01-
\temp\GW)00001 .TMP
--- - ----- I -- ---- . I----
1_1 Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (41F05A00.2AB:10: 53931)
Subject:
In support of the DBG rulemaking petition Creation Date: Thu, Jan 20, 2005 8:25 PM From: Kristie Conrad <kaconrad3 @yahoo.com>
Created By: kaconrad3@yahoo.com Recipients nrc.gov owf5_po.0WFNDO SECY (SECY)
Post Office Route owfSpo.OWFNDO nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1448 Thursday, January 20, 2005 8:25 PM Mime.822 2556 Options.
Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard
