ML043220265

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Facsimile Transmission, Draft Request for Additional Information
ML043220265
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/17/2004
From: Nerses V
NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD1
To: Dan Collins
NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD1
Nerses V, NRR//DLPM, 415-1484
References
TAC MC4902
Download: ML043220265 (3)


Text

November 17, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Daniel S. Collins, Acting Chief, Section 2 Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Victor Nerses, Senior Project Manager, Section 2 /RA/

Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1, FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NO.

MC4902)

The attached draft RAI was transmitted by facsimile on November 17, 2004, to Mr. Micheal OKeefe of FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC (FPL Energy Seabrook). This draft RAI was transmitted to facilitate the technical review being conducted by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and to support a conference call with FPL Energy Seabrook in order to clarify certain items. The draft RAI is related to the licensees October 22, 2004, submittal regarding proposed changes to Technical Specification 3.3.3.6, Accident Monitoring Instrumentation. Review of the RAI would allow the licensee to determine and agree upon a schedule to respond to the RAI. This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensees request.

Docket No. 50-443

Enclosure:

Draft RAI

November 17, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Daniel S. Collins, Acting Chief, Section 2 Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Victor Nerses, Senior Project Manager, Section 2 /RA/

Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1, FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NO.

MC4902)

The attached draft RAI was transmitted by facsimile on November 17, 2004, to Mr. Micheal OKeefe of FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC (FPL Energy Seabrook). This draft RAI was transmitted to facilitate the technical review being conducted by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and to support a conference call with FPL Energy Seabrook in order to clarify certain items. The draft RAI is related to the licensees October 22, 2004, submittal regarding proposed changes to Technical Specification 3.3.3.6, Accident Monitoring Instrumentation. Review of the RAI would allow the licensee to determine and agree upon a schedule to respond to the RAI. This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensees request.

Docket No. 50-443

Enclosure:

Draft RAI DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC PDI-2 Reading BMarcus V. Nerses GMiller Accession Number: ML043220265 OFFICE PDI-2/PE PDI-2/PM EEIB-A/SC NAME GMiller VNerses EMarinos DATE 11/15/04 11/16/04 11/15/04

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO REQUESTED CHANGES TO TS 3.3.3.6 FPL ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC SEABROOK STATION DOCKET NO. 50-443 By letter dated October 22, 2004, FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC (FPL Energy Seabrook),

submitted LAR 04-08, which requested Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval of a proposed amendment to facility operating license number NPF-86. The proposed change would revise the Seabrook Station Technical Specification (TS) 3.3.3.6, Accident Monitoring Instrumentation. The NRC staff has developed the following draft questions during its review of the application:

1. In LAR 04-08, FPL Energy Seabrook states that the revised actions proposed in the amendment request are consistent with the conditions and completion times contained in NUREG 1431, Rev. 3, Improved Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse Plants, (ISTS).

Please provide a comparison of the assumptions and similarities of the Seabrook Station TS 3.3.3.6 to the ISTS equivalent section 3.3.3. This comparison should include a comparison of LCOs, operating mode applicability, exceptions to other LCOs, and surveillance requirements.