ML042810068
| ML042810068 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png |
| Issue date: | 09/28/2004 |
| From: | Shadis R New England Coalition |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Byrdsong A T | |
| References | |
| 50-271-OLA, ASLBP 04-832-02-OLA, RAS 8578 | |
| Download: ML042810068 (3) | |
Text
4 wkAS S537 '
A.
September 28, 2004 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, L.L.C.
and ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station)
ASLBP No.04-832 OLA Docket No. 50-271 DOCKETED-USNRC September29, 2004 (7:17AM)
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Administrative Judges Alex S. Carlin, Chair Dr. Anthony J. Barrata Lester S. Rubenstein United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 NEW ENGLAND COALITION'S REQUEST FOR SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENT Gentlemen, Having been advised by Chairman Karlin's office that this Panel is contemplating scheduling oral arguments on contentions during the business week of October 18 through 21, New England Coalition immediately set about determining the availability of its team for that time.
We found that the first three days of that week are extremely problematic for us in terms of previously set and conflicting schedules.
We then polled the other parties as to their availability and willingness to accommodate a proposed alternate schedule of either: October 21 and 22; or during the following week beginning with October 25.
NRC staff responded that they had no objection to any of the suggested dates. The State of Vermont stated that their team is available for any of the suggested dates, save for Friday, October 29. Entergy answered that they had no objection to scheduling for October 21 and 22, but that they would rather not put off the oral argument until the following week.
New England Coalition now respectfully requests, in consideration of the facts stated above, that this Panel schedule oral argument on the contentions for October 21 and 22, 2004. Or if Entergy, with more time to consider, finds that it can accommodate a change
,oelh f se cy of/
ASLBP No. 04-832-02-OLA Nev England Coalition September 28, 2004 Page 2 of 2 to the following week, we then ask that the Panel schedule a change to the week of October 25. New England Coalition could also meet and would be amenable to any November date(s) the Panel might select.
New England Coalition now eagerly awaits your decision. Thank you for your kind attention.
Sincerely, Raymond Shadis Pro Se Representative New England Coalition Post Office Box 98 Edgecomb, Maine 04556 207-882-7801 shadis(prexar.com Copies of this letter have been provided to all parties via e-mail and US Mail.
September 28, 2004 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ASLBP No. 04-832-02-OLA ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, L.L.C.
Docket No. 50-271 and ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station)
Rulemak-ings and Adjudications Staff Office of the Secretary United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff,
Please find for filing in the above captioned matter one original and two copies of NEW ENGLAND COALITION'S REOUEST FOR SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENT Thank you for your kind attention.
Sincerely, Raymond Shadis Pro Se Representative New England Coalition Post Office Box 98 Edgecomb, Maine 04556 207-882-7801 shadisOhprexar~com Copies of this letter have been provided to the ASLBP and all parties via e-mail and US Mail.