|
|---|
Category:Legal-Motion
MONTHYEARML0831905302008-11-0606 November 2008
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and Nancy Burton, (Attorney) Notice of Appeal
ML0822506942008-08-11011 August 2008
NRC Staff'S Answer Opposing Petitioner'S Motion Dated July 31, 2008 for Nunc Pro Tunc Relief and Continuing Waiver of Electronic Filing
ML0822506912008-08-11011 August 2008
NRC Staff Answer Opposing Petitioner'S Motion Dated July 31, 2008 for Nunc Pro Tunc Relief and Continuing Waiver of Electronic Filing
ML0822700412008-08-0707 August 2008
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and Nancy Burton Revised Motion for Leave to File Their New And/Or Amended Contentions Based on Receipt of New Information and for Continuing Waiver of Electronic Filing
ML0822003562008-07-31031 July 2008
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and Nancy Burton Motion for Leave to File Their Motion for Leave to File New And/Or Amended Contentions Based on Receipt of New Information Dated July 18, 2008, Nunc Pro Tunc, and for Continuing.
ML0812207412008-05-0101 May 2008
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut'S Motion to Strike Portions of Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and Nancy Burton'S Reply to Responses to Petition to Intervene
ML0811305222008-04-16016 April 2008
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and Nancy Burton'S Motion to Consolidate Reply to NRC Staff and Dominion Responses to Petition to Intervene and for Extension of Time to File Consolidated Reply on or Before April 22, 2008
ML0604105372006-01-30030 January 2006
Motion Information Statement - Motion for Leave to Intervene, Dated 1/30/2006
ML0601704802006-01-0404 January 2006
Unopposed Motion of Dominion Nuclear Connecticut for Leave to Intervene & Corporate Disclosure Statement, Dated 1/4/06
ML0603101972005-11-25025 November 2005
2005/11/25-Motion to Reopen Millstone License Renewal Proceeding Filed by the Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone
ML0523702062005-08-18018 August 2005
Motion of the Nuclear Energy Institute for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to Suffolk County'S Request for an Exemption from or Waiver of 10 C.F.R. 50.47(a)(1)
ML0523702092005-08-18018 August 2005
Brief of Dominion Nuclear Connecticut in Response to CLI-05-18 Concerning Suffolk County'S Late Petition and Waiver Request
ML0510401902005-03-18018 March 2005
NRC Staff Motion to Strike County of Suffolk'S Reply and Response to 10 CFR 2.335 Request for Waiver
ML0512602312004-10-0606 October 2004
Mandated Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, the Petitioner'S Petition for Review of Two Decisions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Dated 4/8/05
ML0426103042004-09-10010 September 2004
Federal Respondent'S Reply to Petitioner'S Objection to Motion to Dismiss, Dated 9/10/04
ML0426103012004-09-0303 September 2004
Petitioner'S Objection to Motion to Dismiss, Dated 9/3/04
ML0426103002004-09-0202 September 2004
Petitioner'S Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Motion to Dismiss, Dated 9/2/04
ML0426102962004-08-26026 August 2004
Response by Dominion Nuclear in Support of Motion to Dismiss, Dated 8/26/04
ML0423900322004-08-18018 August 2004
Dominion'S Answer to Ccam'S Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Leave to Amend Petition
ML0425701172004-08-16016 August 2004
Federal Respondents Motion to Dismiss, Dated 8/16/04
ML0809803502004-08-16016 August 2004
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone V. USNRC and Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, No. 07-3577-ag; Federal Respondents' Motion to Dismiss
ML0423205482004-08-0909 August 2004
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone Motion for Reconsideration and Request for Leave to Amend Petition
ML0425701112004-07-30030 July 2004
Order Granting Motion to Intervene, Dated 7/30/04
ML0425701092004-07-19019 July 2004
Unopposed Motion to Intervene, Dated 7/19/2004
ML0414201772004-05-14014 May 2004
Motion for Reconsideration of CLI-04-12
ML0412501942004-04-13013 April 2004
Appeal Scheduling Order #2
ML0411300352004-04-12012 April 2004
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone Reply to NRC Staff and Dominion Response to Motion to Vacate
ML0409901582004-04-0202 April 2004
Dominion'S Answer to Ccam'S Motion to Vacate Secretary Determination
ML0409705222004-04-0202 April 2004
Millstone Units 2 & 3 - NRC Staff'S Response to Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone'S Motion to Vacate and to Accept Petition to Intervene and Request for Hearing
ML0409300792004-04-0101 April 2004
Millstone Units 2 & 3 - NRC Staff'S Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone'S Petition to Intervene and Request for Hearing
ML0410403392004-03-22022 March 2004
Motion to Vacate NRC Secretary Determination of Petition Prematurity and to Accept Petiton to Intervene and Request for Hearing as of Date of Filing and to Apply 'Old' CFR Hearing Rules to Said Petition
ML0405602262004-01-23023 January 2004
Motion for Leave to Intervene for Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. Dated 01/23/2004
ML0332202232003-11-17017 November 2003
NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Petitioner'S Motion for Reconsideration
ML0331701272003-11-0404 November 2003
Answer of Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. to Motion of Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone for Reconsideration of CLI-03-14
ML0331701232003-11-0303 November 2003
Motion for Reconsideration
ML0321806782003-06-11011 June 2003
Respondent'S Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review Granted Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone, No. 03-4372) Dated 06/11/03
ML0310506282003-04-14014 April 2003
Federal Respondents' Motion to Dismiss, Dated April 14, 2003
ML0307904422003-03-11011 March 2003
Motion Information Statement Re Leave to Intervene
ML0307904362003-03-11011 March 2003
Motion of Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. for Leave to Intervene
ML0307304392003-03-0707 March 2003
Motion of Petitioner, Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone, for One-Day Extension of Time to File Supplemented Petition and Contentions
ML0208703162002-03-18018 March 2002
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and Long Island Coalition Against Millstone Response to NRC Staff Motion to Strike
ML0207900102002-03-15015 March 2002
NRC Staff'S Motion to Strike Reply Brief Filed by Ccam/Cam
ML0207100652002-03-0808 March 2002
NRC Staff'S Response to the Motion of the Nuclear Energy Institute for Leave to File an Amicus Brief
ML0207301032002-02-27027 February 2002
Motion by the Nuclear Energy Institute for Leave to File an Amicus Brief in Response to the Commission'S Memorandum and Orders Dated February 6, 2002, Regarding the Commission'S Consideration of Potential Intentional Malevolent Acts
ML0205802412002-02-26026 February 2002
NRC Staff'S Response Opposing Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and Long Island Coalition Against Millstone'S Motion to Extend Scheduling Orders and Date of Oral Argument
ML0205805842002-02-25025 February 2002
NRC Staff'S Motion to Compel Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and Long Island Coalition Against Millstone to Respond to NRC Staff'S First Set of Descovery Requests Directed to Intervenors in the Reopened Proceeding
ML0216901222002-02-22022 February 2002
Connecticut, Inc.'S Response to Motion to Extend Scheduling Orders and Date of Oral Argument
ML0206505902002-02-21021 February 2002
Connecticut, Inc.'S Emergency Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents
ML0206506052002-02-19019 February 2002
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and Long Island Coalition Against Millstone Motion to Extend Scheduling Orders and Date of Oral Argument
ML0202501972002-01-0303 January 2002
Connecticut'S Response to Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and Long Island Coalition Against Millstone Reply to Oppositions to Motion to Reopen the Record and Request for Admission of Late-Filed Envrionmental Contention
2008-08-07
[Table view] |
Text
T-1080 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Each motion must be accompanied by a supporting affidavit with statement of issues. (Local Rule 27(a))
Include brief statement of facts with page references to the moving papers.
04-3577-AG Connecticut Coalition Against Docket Number Millstone V. NIOTION INFORMIATION FORNI U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al.
siseshort title Motionfo0Extt-nyinn of Time tio Reply to Motion to Dismiss
%i0TlION BN (Nanie. address and tel. no. of lawvfirm OPPOSING COUNSEL: (Name. address and tei. ro.
and of arror,,er in charge of rote) of lawiilrm andallorney in charge tif rase)
-Nancy Burton -203-938-3952 Charles-E.-.Mullins 301-415-1606 147 Cross Highway U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,WashingtonDC 86 7 6 EMERGENCY MIOTIONS, MIOTIONS FOR STrAYS AND ll1 fc ,sc INJUNCTIONS PENDING APPEAL A. been sought? X Yes ONo B. been obtained? X Yes 0 No Has request for relief been made below? M Yes 0 No (See F.R.A.P. Rule 8.)
IHas service been effected? N Yes 0 No Is oral argument desired? 0 Yes10 No Any previous request for similar relief
,{Substantive mnotion.i only) made to-the 2 Circuit? O Yes C Nv Requested return date: Would e.iledi appeal eliminate need
{See Second Circuit Rule 27(b).) for this motion? C Yes El No Hlas,argurnent-date of appeal been set: .Ifno, explain'.why not: '
A. by scheduling order? o Yes 2Xj No B. by firm date/argument notice? o Yes )J No Will the parties agree to maintain the status quo C. If ves, enter date: until the motion is heard? . C Yes C No Judge or agency whose order is being appealed:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission :.;
Briel'statement of the relief requested: - toyi,.iss o day Motion for Extension of Time to File Replyfto 1tion to'Dismfss. one day beyond date set (September 3, 2004) 1 By}(SigLaruer ofAtfomee)' ______ -. Appearing for:-(Name of Part n Si-ned name must be pr' d beneath.
N Bur / . Appellant or Pettioner: e aiiniitl Delendnti Dc Sep 2 2004 Ajpellee or Respondent: E PlaintiOff E DekOCIda lDate: September 2, 2004 ORDER rordiy leave this space blank.
iBEroRE:
IT IS IIEREBY,ORDERED that the motion be and it hereby is gr~anted; . : efnied.
., ,. , . . :r . - ' I C- _r the
--- Cour:.
'ROSEANN B. MAc'KECHNIE. CLERK
. . I
'Date , By:..
March 2001 ,. ) _19_
i-
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT CONNECTICUT COALITION 04-3577-AG AGAINST MILLSTONE V.
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR._____:
REGULATORY COMMISSION ET AL. SEPTEMBER 2, 2004 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS The petitioner, Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone, moves for an extension of time within which to reply to the motion to dismiss filed on behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of American.
The petitioner requests a one-day extension beyond the date set for a reply, to September 3, 2004.
The extension is sought because of a variety of scheduling conflicts on the part of petitioner's counsel, the undersigned. Counsel for the Government Respondents as well as the Intervenor have consented to this request.
An affidavit accompanies this motion.
CONNECTICUT COALITION AGAINST MILLSTONE The Petitioner By:
Nancy Bu k4,Esq.
147 Cros-ighway Redding Ridge CT 06876 Tel. 203-938-3952 Ct5550
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT CONNECTICUT COALITION 04-3577-AG AGAINST MILLSTONE V.
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ET AL. : _ SEPTEMBER 2, 2004 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME I, Nancy Burton, under penalty of perjury, do hereby declare and affirm as follows:
- 1. I am above the age of eighteen (18) years and I believe in the obligation of an oath.
- 2. I represent the petitioner, Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone, in this matter.
- 3. This affidavit is submitted in support of the accompanying Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Motion to Dismiss.
- 4. The extension is sought because of professional scheduling conflicts involving briefing and other commitments.
- 5. Counsel for the Government Respondents and the Intervenor have consented to the request.
CERTIFICATION This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing "Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Motion to Dismiss" delivered to the U.S. Postal Service, postage pre-paid, First Class, on September 2, 2004, for service upon the following:
Charles E. Mullins, Esq.
Office of the General Counsel
-- -----U.S.-Nuclear .Regulatory Commission-_
Washington DC 20555-0001 Andrew Mergen, Esq.
Appellate Section Environment and Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 23795 Washington DC 20026-3795 David R. Lewis, Esq.
Shaw Pittman LLP 2300 N Street NW Washington DC 20037-1128 Lillian M. Cuoco, Esq.
Millstone Nuclear Power Station Building 475/5 Rope Ferry Road Waterford CT 06385
-g ---
