ML042570272

10 CFR 50.54(p) Report of Changes to the Ostr Physical Security Plan Which Do Not Decrease the Effectiveness of the Plan

ML042570272
Person / Time
Site:	Oregon State University
Issue date:	09/03/2004
From:	Klein A Oregon State University
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML042570272 (1)

Text

WHEN SEPARATED FROM ENCLOSURES, HANDLE TIHS DOCUMENT AS DECONTROLLED RADIATON CENTER

• . , OREGON STATE UNmvERSrry

00

• -*RadiatiaCer, Corvais,Oregon97331-5903 Telephonc541-737-2341 Fax541-737-04S0 September 3, 2004 US. Nuclear Regulatoiy Commission Document Control Desk------ - -----

Washington, D.C. 20555 i ,.,; .,('l

Reference:

Oregon State University TRIGA Reactor (OSTR),

.Docket No. 50-243, License No. R-106

Subject:

10 CFR 50. 5 4 (p) Report of Changes to the OSTR Physical Security Plan Which Do I - Not Decrease the Effectiveness of the Plan Gentlemen:.&: .  ;,-- ? t - 1 I'"') L  :,  ; , -'

.?vAs a result ofour~annual reviewof the,07SRPhysical Security Plan, certain changes to the plan were determined to be necessary. ,This letter represents our.forma report ofthechanges governe oby10CFR 50.54(p). Based pn our,evaluationofthese revisions, we have concluded.

that none of the specific changes in the attacbed enclosure reduces plan's effectiveness.

f:'.

• .In keeping with theinstructions in USNRC generic letters 84-18 and 82-39, specific, information regarding.the Physical Security Plan changes areincluded as a separate enclosure (Enclosure 1) to this letter. Enclosure 2 provides the necessary replacement pages for your copy of the Physical Security Plan. All changes and updates to the Physical Security Plan have been reviewed by the OSTR physical security staff and approved by the Reactor Operations Committee. It was concluded by both groups that the safeguards effectiveness of the OSTR physical security program is not reduced by adoption oftliese changes.

If there are~agy questiQns regarding the information submitted, please let me know. In accordance with 10 CF -2.7.0(td) and any other applicable parts of the USNRC's regulations, we herebyxrequest that.Ec rsure 1,Enclosure 2,?and this'lette when it is attached to either or all of these enclosures, be withheld from public~disclosure.i I:declare under penalty of pedJury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on .?b09.

Yours sincerely, .1 . ..

( drew C. Klein

• b'Director Je-53

• A* 1 4 ~Co2c'D cc: SDocument Control, USNRC (w/oenclosures) Craig Baassett, USNRC David Stewart-Smith, ODOE (wlo idcoures) John Rinogle, OSU (w/o enclosures)

Al Adams, USNRC Steve Re=se, OSU (w/o enclosures)