ML042440608
| ML042440608 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 08/10/2004 |
| From: | Parkhurst M Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
| To: | Jack Cushing, Kugler A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML042440608 (3) | |
Text
'Jack Gushing - FW: Barking tree frogs at Surry Page 11 From:
"Parkhurst, Mary Ann' <maryann.parkhurst@pnl.gov>
To:
Jack Cushing <JXC9@nrc.gov>, Andrew Kugler <AJK1 @nrc.gov>
Date:
8/10/04 4:43PM
Subject:
FW: Barking tree frogs at Surry Response from Mike S.
Mary Ann Parkhurst Battelle (PNNL), K3-55 (509) 375-6893 Fax (509) 375-6936 P. 0. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352
[Express mail street address:
902 Battelle Blvd]
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
Sackschewsky, Michael R
> Sent:
Tuesday, August 10, 2004 12:09 PM
> To:
Parkhurst, Mary Ann; Miller, Beverly M
Subject:
FW: Barking tree frogs at Surry
> Please pass on to NRC and Dominion -
> This answers my questions, and confirms what I had concluded based on my own analysis of the situation.
> thanks to all.
> Michael R. Sackschewsky
, From:
Patterson, Karen
> Sent:
Tuesday, August 10, 2004 11:56 AM
> To:
Sackschewsky, Michael R
> Cc:
Tony-Banks©dom.com; rlbaker~bechtel.com
Subject:
Barking tree frogs at Surry
> Mike -- Rich Baker forwarded your question to me. I might be able to clear up some of the confusion.
> When TtNUS analyzes T&E species for license renewal ERs, we include in the list of species that could occur (Table 2-3) any animal that the state has listed as a county occurrence in the counties of interest, if the habitat is appropriate. In other words, the VDNR lists the barking tree frog as occurring in Surry County, and there is habitat for it at Surry, so we included it in the table. We try and cover that in the table title as species that "occur or could possibly occur" at a location.
> HOWEVER, Dominion has stated many times that they have never found the frog at Surry, hence the statement on page 2-25 of the Surry License Renewal ER. I don't think anyone has looked for it on tMines.
> TtNUS did not prepare the ESP alternatives analysis. I suspect that the person responsible for writing it did not fully understand the approach we used in the Surry OR ER, and missed the not-to-helpful table title. Hence the morph to "with the exception of... the barking tree frog."
> There have never been any barking tree frogs observed at the SAPS site. In my opinion the ESP statement is incorrect. Bill Bolin will likely support that.
Jack Cushing - FW: Barking tree frogs at Surry
> Hope this helps.
.. ~ -P a g e CC:
"Sackschewsky, Michael RO <michael.sackschewsky~pnl.gov>
C:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\GW)00001.TMP Mo A
i Mail Envelope Properties (41193372.A34: 19: 64052)
Pace 1 1l
-- --. -
A
Subject:
Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
FW: Barking tree frogs at Surry 8/10/04 3:52PM "Parkhurst, Mary Ann" <maryann.parkhurst@pnl.gov>
maryann.parkhurst@pnl.gov Recipients nrc.gov owf4po.OWFNDO AJK1 (Andrew Kugler)
JXC9 (Jack Cushing) pnl.gov michael.sackschewsky CC (Michael R Sacksch Post Office owf4_po.OWFN_DO Route nrc.gov pnl.gov Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm Mime.822 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
Reply Requested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security:
Size 2194 4538 9047 Date & Time 08/10/04 03:52PM None Standard No None No Standard