ML042320171

Final Qa/Related Forms

ML042320171
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	06/07/2004
From:	Conicella N Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
References
50-272/04-301, 50-311/04-301
Download: ML042320171 (17)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Target Date*

Task Description 1 Reference

-180 (12/10103)

-120 (02/08/04)

-120 (02108/04)

-1 20 (OUO8/04) 1-90] (03/09/04)

-75 (03/24/04)

-70 (03/29/04)

1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l.a; C.2.a & b)

2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)

4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c)l

6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.l.e & fi C.3.d)

7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

-45 (4123104)

8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g & h; C.3.d)

-30 (05/08/04)

9. Preliminary license applications due (C.l.I; C.2.g; ES-202)

Fa c i I i ty :

SALEM 1&2 Date of Examination: 06/07/2004 Chief Examiner's Initials

-jfs

-rF f F

-IF q=

TF

-14 (05/24/04)

-14 (05/24/04)

-7 (05/31/04)

-14 (05/24104) 1 IO. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1.I; C.2.g; ES-202) 1 I.

Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

Tf C.3.g)

TF

12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f & h;

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 (05/31/04)

14. Final a plications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver

&b &

(C.2.g, ES-204)

-7 (05/31/04)

-7 (05/31/04)

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions II I

distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)

Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

[ J

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facilitv: SALEM Date of Examination: 6/6/04 - 6/18/04 iitials Item Task Description b* -

K NIA

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit@) the appropriate model per ES-401.

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all WA categories are appropriately sampled.

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected WA statements are appropriate.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotations schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)*, and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

NIA NtA -

NIA NIA NIA N/A -

NIA NIA

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and auantitative criteria sPecified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Amendix D.

a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensees exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 4-6 (2-3 for SRO-U) of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternated path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicants response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walkthrough requires the applicant to enter the RCS.

~

~~

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered.

NIA NIA NIA

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

N/A NIA NIA

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.

N/A2 N/A2 NtA2 NJA~

N/A -

NIA NIA -

NlA2 NIA -

f 0

m Z

rn A

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c. Ensure that WA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

NlA NlA2 NlA2 N/A2 NlA2 -

NlA2 N/A2 -

NtA2

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

N/A2.*

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor 3 //d /a 4 3

- //

Y

\\Sate:

• Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

N/A - Not applicable based on NRC development of Simulator and Walk-Through portion of exam.,&W@f N/A2 - Not applicable until completion of Simulator and Walk-Through portion of exam.*

fib%

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist II 11 Facility:

Salem 1 & 2 (NRC Developed Operating Test)

Date of Examination: 06107104 Item Task Description I

Initials I

I M

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test@)*, and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

a. Verify that:

(1) the ouUine(s) contain@) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination,,

(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test@), and (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly form the licensees exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safely function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition.

(3) 4-6 (2-3 for SRO-U) of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicants response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered,

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

I

a. Assess whether plant-specifi section.

Y or, w/i&.q riorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

76

c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

b. Facility Reviewer C)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor W

Note:

• Not applicable for NRCdeveloped examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column G chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

?Cg I 04-Y I. Pre-Examinatic RECEIVED

?FGIOM I ATTACHMENT 6 Page I of I NRC Examination Security Agreement NC.TQ-WB.ZZ-O027(Z)

!-I Z L T I acknowledge that 1 have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that 1 am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my kn during the week@)

instruct, evaluate, below and authorized by the NRC.

not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not ance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted ro>

O r O r (A

- P 3 2

- 2 m

0 Z

I

--1 I

m I v, 73 2

0 I

9 z

0 m

v, s

c v,

-I m

m 5

-I 9 0

I m

U 7

0 aJ 2

m r-U c

v, m

ATTACHMENT 6 Page 1 of I NRC Examination Security Agreement

1.

Pr6Examination I acknowledge that 1 have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 7 &-6-/fi as of the date NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not w been au orized by the

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

JOB TITLE I PRINTED NAME Rev. 3

i P&cf 3 04 '-I

1.

Pre-Examination NRC Examination Security Agreement Page 1 of 1 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week@) of NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

7-18 bLl as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have no $4 been authorized by the

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my during the not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME DATE NOTE Submit this completed attachment with examination records Page 45 of 91 Rev. 4

i' \\

NRC Examination Security Agreement Page 1 of 1 i

NC.TQ-WB.U-O027(Z)

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(@ of NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

-1 6 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not w een authorized by the

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my below and authorized by the NRC.

not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE JOB TITLE /

RESPONSIBILITY PRINTED NAME A ~ L ~ L F cdmiC& zh9 M4,,43-K Q

.L-6jd6 e

Submit this completed attachment with examination records Page 45 of 91 Rev. 4

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Salem 1 8 2 Date of Examination: 06/07/2004 Operating Te

1. GENERAL CRITERIA

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.l.a).

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

b.

C.

d.

e.

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

. initial conditions

. initiating cues

. references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

. specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

b.

C.

3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA

a.

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name I Signature

b. Facility Reviewerr)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

Tbbb EL5N 1 $&

G 5 r

d. NRC Supervisor I

U Number: HOTEL Date I

/

U NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRCdeveloped tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c:" chief examiner concurrence reauired.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Facility:

Salem 1 8 2 Date of Exam: 06/07/04 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 I 3 Operating Test No.: HOTEL I

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.5.d)

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8)

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Actual Attributes 4 1 5 1 5 I

, Initial

2.

3.

Abnormal events (2-4)

4.

Major transients (1-2)

Malfunctions afler EOP entry (1-2)

5.

EOPs enterdrequiring substantive actions (1-2)

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

1 1 2 I 1 4 13 1 4 1 I 1 I 1 2 I 1 12

2.

3.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomdcwes that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

7.

Critical tasks (2-3)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

2 12 12

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

dd

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

I I

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Pcioc t o V d i h d *on *\\,>

IO.

Evely operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

11.

12.

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

A I

6.

EOP continaencies reauirina substantive actions (0-2)

I 1 I l l O I I

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

QUALITATIVE AITRIBUTES quipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it the symptomdcues that will be visible to the crew Initials a

b' c#

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Salem 1 & 2 Date of Examination: 06/07/2004 Operating TE

1. GENERAL CRITERIA

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.l.a).

b.

C.

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent amlicants at the desianated license level.

e.

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

. initial conditions

. initiating cues

. references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

. specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

I Number: HOTEL Initials C.

At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA

a.

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name I Signature

a. Author

&&wBesAw*//&

/-&

b. Facility Reviewerr)

&)

4

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

(ODD I3 Sh L

d. NRC Supervisor I

4-1 Q- &t

-4 1-m zp NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRCdeveloped tests.

I

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

Date NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials i

i

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andor instrumentation may be out of sewice, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomdcues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

I 3.

s.

-iF

/.e f f Tf

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

TF

5.

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

7.

TC 7 -

The simulator modeling is not altered.

1 1

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

11.

12.

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 4 1 5 1 5 4

1 1 2 I 1 A??

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3 e

TC ct

<c xc

.< c 4 13 14

<G

4.

Major transients (1-2) 1 I 1 I 1 4

<c 2 I 1 12 fQ I /I I O

<G

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 2 I2 I 2

<e I 3.

Abnormal events (24)

5.

6.

EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions (1-2)

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)

I NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Form ES-301-4 ES-30 1 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Facility:

Salem 1 81 2 Date of Exam: 06/07/04 Scenario Numbers: 4 /

/

Operating Test No.: HOTEL I

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES I

I Initis I

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Salem I

& 2 OPERATING TEST NO.:

HOTEL Ap licant Reactivity I*

1 1

1 1

Instrument /

2*

2 2

4 2

Major 1

1 1

1 1

Normal 0

Component SRO-U L I

Reactivity 1

Instructions: (1)

(2)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or contro//ed abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.45.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

(3)

Author:

/& /&e&

t NRC Reviewer:

CI NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 ALL 1-7 ALL 1-7 2,3 SRO I

ALL 1-7 ALL 1-7 2,3 Competencies 1

I*

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs.

(3)

Interpret 1 Diagnose Events 5,6 and Conditions 2.3,4.

1,2,3, 4,5,7 2.3 1,2 Operate Control I Boards (2)

Communicate and I l2:

1 ALL Interact 1-7 I

I I

Demonstrate RO 1

SCENARIO I

I BOP iRlO -

3 NA 4

3.4.5 -

304 NA -

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

Y NRC Reviewer:

li& ?L' NUREG-7021, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-40136 Quality Checklist NRC Chief Examiner (#)

3. NRC Regional Supervisor __

Vote:

• The facility reviewer's initialslsignature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c:" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 30 of 34

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist 5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9