ML041490232

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Y020040085 - Ltr to Stephanie Ippoliti and Denis Brucciani Re.: Resolution - Indian Point 2 and 3 Nuclear Power Plants License
ML041490232
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/27/2004
From: Holden C
NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD1
To: Bruccuani D, Ippoliti S
Village of Briarcliff Manor, NY, Village of Mamaroneck, NY
Milano P, NRR/DLPM , 415-1457
References
TAC MC2722, TAC MC2723, Y020040058
Download: ML041490232 (6)


Text

May 27, 2004 Ms. Stephanie Ippoliti Village Clerk Village of Briarcliff Manor 1111 Pleasantville Road Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510

Dear Ms. Ippoliti:

On behalf of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your letter of April 6, 2004, forwarding a resolution by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Briarcliff Manor regarding the possible renewal of the operating license of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and 3). In its resolution, the Board expressed its concerns about the potential of a terrorist attack, the age of the plants, the potential outcome of equipment failure or human error during operation, and siting standards for nuclear facilities.

As you are aware the current facility operating licenses for IP2 and 3 expire in 2013 and 2015, respectively. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. has not announced its intention to seek renewal of the operating licenses for an additional 20 years. If Entergy decides to submit an application to renew the licenses, the NRC staff will review both the safety issues (10 CFR Part 54) and environmental issues (10 CFR Part 51). The licensee must provide the NRC with an evaluation that addresses the technical aspects of plant aging and must describe how the aging will be managed. In addition, the licensee must prepare an evaluation of the potential impact on the environment to support plant operation for the additional 20 years. Some licensee programs, such as security and emergency planning, have periodic update requirements throughout the current operating term that would continue during the period of extended operation. Therefore, these programs provide reasonable assurance that an acceptable level of protection is provided and additional review of their adequacy is not necessary for license renewal. Additional information about license renewal can be found on the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html.

As with any licensing activity, the public will have an opportunity to participate in NRCs decision-making process with regard to license renewal. Guidance that will be used during the review of an application is based not only on NRC views, but on industry experience and the expertise of technical organizations and professional societies. The public, in general, is encouraged to participate in the process through public meetings and public comment periods on the application. In addition, members of the public have an opportunity to request a formal adjudicatory hearing if they would be adversely affected by the proposed license renewal.

The NRC is highly committed to its primary mission to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety. In this regard, the NRC closely monitors nuclear power plants to ensure that they are maintained and operated in accordance with NRC regulations. As we detailed in our letter to the licensee dated March 3, 2004 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML040630555), regarding our recent assessment of IP2 and 3, the NRC considers Indian Point to be operated safely and the current security posture to be strong. The NRC continues to actively monitor the situation at Indian Point, and all of our

S. Ippoliti Nations nuclear power plants, and is prepared to take measures to ensure the continued safety of those nuclear facilities. If a terrorist attack inflicted damage on a nuclear plant, the redundant design features and actions taken by the highly trained plant staff would likely prevent or minimize the release of radioactive material. The emergency response plans would also provide for protective actions for the surrounding population if a release were to occur.

I trust this information is responsive to your concerns. Please contact me if you need additional information.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Cornelius F. Holden, Jr., Director Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

May 27, 2004 Mr. Denis J. Brucciani Clerk-Treasurer Village of Mamaroneck Village Hall P.O. Box 369 123 Mamaroneck Avenue Mamaroneck, NY 10543

Dear Mr. Brucciani:

On behalf of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your letter of April 7, 2004, forwarding a resolution by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mamaroneck regarding the possible renewal of the operating license of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and 3). In its resolution, the Board expressed its concerns about the potential of a terrorist attack, the age of the plants, the potential outcome of equipment failure or human error during operation, and siting standards for nuclear facilities.

As you are aware the current facility operating licenses for IP2 and 3 expire in 2013 and 2015, respectively. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. has not announced its intention to seek renewal of the operating licenses for an additional 20 years. If Entergy decides to submit an application to renew the licenses, the NRC staff will review both the safety issues (10 CFR Part 54) and environmental issues (10 CFR Part 51). The licensee must provide the NRC with an evaluation that addresses the technical aspects of plant aging and must describe how the aging will be managed. In addition, the licensee must prepare an evaluation of the potential impact on the environment to support plant operation for the additional 20 years. Some licensee programs, such as security and emergency planning, have periodic update requirements throughout the current operating term that would continue during the period of extended operation. Therefore, these programs provide reasonable assurance that an acceptable level of protection is provided and additional review of their adequacy is not necessary for license renewal. Additional information about license renewal can be found on the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html.

As with any licensing activity, the public will have an opportunity to participate in NRCs decision-making process with regard to license renewal. Guidance that will be used during the review of an application is based not only on NRC views, but on industry experience and the expertise of technical organizations and professional societies. The public, in general, is encouraged to participate in the process through public meetings and public comment periods on the application. In addition, members of the public have an opportunity to request a formal adjudicatory hearing if they would be adversely affected by the proposed license renewal.

The NRC is highly committed to its primary mission to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety. In this regard, the NRC closely monitors nuclear power plants to ensure that they are maintained and operated in accordance with NRC regulations. As we detailed in our letter to the licensee dated March 3, 2004 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management

D. Brucciani System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML040630555), regarding our recent assessment of IP2 and 3, the NRC considers Indian Point to be operated safely and the current security posture to be strong. The NRC continues to actively monitor the situation at Indian Point, and all of our Nations nuclear power plants, and is prepared to take measures to ensure the continued safety of those nuclear facilities. If a terrorist attack inflicted damage on a nuclear plant, the redundant design features and actions taken by the highly trained plant staff would likely prevent or minimize the release of radioactive material. The emergency response plans would also provide for protective actions for the surrounding population if a release were to occur.

I trust this information is responsive to your concerns. Please contact me if you need additional information.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Cornelius F. Holden, Jr., Director Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

D. Brucciani System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML040630555), regarding our recent assessment of IP2 and 3, the NRC considers Indian Point to be operated safely and the current security posture to be strong. The NRC continues to actively monitor the situation at Indian Point, and all of our Nations nuclear power plants, and is prepared to take measures to ensure the continued safety of those nuclear facilities. If a terrorist attack inflicted damage on a nuclear plant, the redundant design features and actions taken by the highly trained plant staff would likely prevent or minimize the release of radioactive material. The emergency response plans would also provide for protective actions for the surrounding population if a release were to occur.

I trust this information is responsive to your concerns. Please contact me if you need additional information.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Cornelius F. Holden, Jr., Director Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC (w/incoming) T. Marsh/E. Leeds P. Milano OPA PDI-1 R/F (w/inc) C. Holden S. Little OSP J. Dyer/R. Borchardt R. Laufer T. Walker, R-I NRR Mailroom B. Sheron P-T Kuo R. Bores, R-I H. Miller, R-I S. Lee L. Cox B. McDermott, R-I M. Case Identical Letter sent to: Village of Briarcliff Manor INCOMING NO.: ML041130458 ACCESSION NO: ML041490232 PACKAGE: ML041490238 OFFICE PDI-1/PM PDI-1/LA RLEP/SC R-I\DRP PDI-1\SC PDI-1\D NAME PMilano SLittle SLee TWalker RLaufer CHolden DATE 05/20/04 05/20/04 5/26/04 5/25/04 5/26/04 5/27/04 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY