ML041250454
| ML041250454 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 05/04/2004 |
| From: | Anton Vegel NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EEB |
| To: | Crane C Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
| References | |
| Download: ML041250454 (5) | |
Text
May 4, 2004 Mr. Christopher M. Crane President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT:
CLINTON POWER STATION INFORMATION REQUEST FOR AN NRC BIENNIAL MAINTENANCE RULE IMPLEMENTATION BASELINE INSPECTION
Dear Mr. Crane:
On June 21, 2004, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the required biennial inspection of maintenance rule implementation at your Clinton Power Station. This inspection will be performed in accordance with the NRC baseline inspection procedure 71111.12B.
In order to minimize the impact that the inspection has on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both sides, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for the inspection.
The documents have been divided into two groups. The first group lists information necessary in order to ensure the inspector is adequately prepared for the inspection. This information should be available to the Regional Office by no later than June 11, 2004. In so far as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead inspector. Based on the information provided for the preparation week, the inspector will select four to six structures, systems, and components (SSCs) for detailed review during the inspection.
The second group of documents requested are those items which the inspector will review or need access to during the inspection. It is important that these documents be as complete as possible, in order to minimize the number of documents requested during the preparation week or during the onsite inspection. The systems/SSCs selected by the inspector will be discussed with the inspectors contact during the preparation week such that the document request can be completed as requested.
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Andrew Dunlop. If there are any questions about the material requested, or the inspection, please call the lead inspector at 630-829-9726 or e-mail him at axd7@nrc.gov.
C. Crane In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Anton Vegel, Chief System Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-461 License No. NPF-62
Enclosure:
Initial Document Request cc w/encl:
Site Vice President - Clinton Power Station Plant Manager - Clinton Power Station Regulatory Assurance Manager - Clinton Power Station Chief Operating Officer Senior Vice President - Nuclear Services Vice President - Operations Support Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Manager Licensing - Clinton Power Station Senior Counsel, Nuclear, Mid-West Regional Operating Group Document Control Desk - Licensing
C. Crane In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Anton Vegel, Chief System Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-461 License No. NPF-62
Enclosure:
Initial Document Request cc w/encl:
Site Vice President - Clinton Power Station Plant Manager - Clinton Power Station Regulatory Assurance Manager - Clinton Power Station Chief Operating Officer Senior Vice President - Nuclear Services Vice President - Operations Support Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Manager Licensing - Clinton Power Station Senior Counsel, Nuclear, Mid-West Regional Operating Group Document Control Desk - Licensing ADAMS Distribution:
AJM DFT JBH1 RidsNrrDipmIipb GEG HBC PLL DRPIII DRSIII PLB1 JRK1 DOCUMENT NAME: G:DRS\\ML041250454.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII E RIII E RIII E
NAME ADunlop:tr TTongue for AStone AVegel DATE 05/04/04 05/04/04 05/04/04 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Enclosure 1
Initial Document Request I.
Information Requested Expeditiously The following information is requested to be provided as soon as possible, but no later than June 11, 2004. In so far as possible, information should be provided electronically.
1.
Maintenance Rule (MR) Administrative Procedures; 2.
Copies of the last two Periodic Evaluations; 3.
Current List of MR Systems/SSCs Showing (a)(1) and (a)(2) Status; 4.
Listing of MR High Safety Significant Systems (if not included in item 1 or 2);
5.
Listing of Top Ten Important PRA/PSA Systems; and 6.
Name and phone numbers of the technical contact and a regulatory contact.
II.
Information Requested to be Available on First Day of Inspection We request that the following information be available to the inspector once he arrives onsite. Some documents, such as the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) or the IPE/PSA, do not need to be solely available to the inspector (i.e., they can be located in a reference library) as long as the inspector has ready access to them. Items 12 through 15 are only for the systems/SSCs selected during the preparation week.
1.
IPE/PSA and USAR available for review; 2.
Performance Criteria for all SSCs in the MR; 3.
List of Unavailability and Reliability Data used for all MR SSCs in performing the Periodic Evaluation (if not included in periodic evaluation report);
4.
Maintenance Rule (a)(1) Cause Determinations and Goals for all SSCs in (a)(1) during the time frame of the periodic evaluation; 5.
Disposition sheets for why SSCs removed from (a)(1) during the time frame of the periodic evaluation; 6.
List of all SSCs Removed from or added to the MR Program for the time frame of the periodic evaluation; 7.
List of all Performance Criteria Changes made to MR SSCs for the time frame of the periodic evaluation; 8.
Copies of MR Quarterly Reviews for the time frame of the periodic evaluation. (if they are being performed);
Enclosure 2
9.
Audit/Self Assessment of the MR Program performed in the last 2 years; 10.
Expert Panel meeting minutes for the time frame of the periodic evaluation (Available for review);
11.
List of all Functional Failures, MPFFs, RMPFFs for the time frame of the periodic evaluation (if not included in periodic evaluation report);
12.
PSA Basis for the MR Performance Criteria for the SSCs selected during preparation week; 13.
List of Work Requests (Orders)/Condition Reports for SSCs selected for the time frame of the periodic evaluation; 14.
Copies of System Health Report (if applicable) for SSCs selected; and 15.
Name and phone numbers for the system engineer(s) for SSCs selected.