ML041100415
| ML041100415 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 02/20/2004 |
| From: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | Christine Lipa FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co, NRC/RGN-III |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0140 | |
| Download: ML041100415 (24) | |
Text
Christine - is-Besse Restart Performance Indicators for February 5,2004 Pge 1 From: <knfehr@ firstenergycorp.com>
To: <dbnrc firstenergycorp.com>, <calgnrc.gov>, <cstl @nrc.gov>, qjbhl @nrc.gov>,
<jag@ nrc.gov>, <dxp@ nrc.gov>, .ajm @nrc.gov>, <whr@ nrc.gov>, <jer7@nrc.gov>,
<gmwolfffirstenergycorp.com>, ccapnce~firstenergycorp.com>, dimartin1 @firstenergycorp.com>,
cjhirsch@firstenergycorp.com>, <brownr~firstenergycorp.com>, <jfs2@nrc.gov>, cJxclO@nrc.gov>,
cSDB26 nrc.gov>, cfastr~firstenergycorp.com>
Date: 2/20/04 1:39PM
Subject:
Davis-Besse Restart Performance Indicators for February 15, 2004 (See attached file: PerfPkg_02_15_04.pdf)
Attached are the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Restart Performance Indicators for February 15, 2004.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Thank you, Kathy 419-321-8214 (See attached file: Perf_Pkg_02_15_04.pdf)
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Restart Performance Indicators February 15, 2004 h,
. - . B . x - . S . . - - - . . \
/ .; . . y . 0 0 f - . ;.S . - . , \
/ ::: NRC 0350 'Resta'ri-'iItems '.: '. \
/0 - X--: lt. ;.. .; .d.f; --- ; \
S: : . ............ . - . ' . :: . \
FOR INFORMATION ONLY
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Restart Performance Indicators Distribution:
FENOCExecutives:
G. R. Leidich A-GO-19 L. W. Myers DB 3086 J. Hagan A-GO-14 M. Bezilla DB 3080 F. von Ahn A-GO-14 J. R. Fast A-GO-14 pavis-Besse Management:
B. Allen DB 2101 R. W. Schrauder DB 3086 J. J. Powers DB 3105 M.J. Stevens DB 1025 C.A. Price DB 3310 M.J. Ross DB 2103 ExternalDistibution:
C. A. Lipa, NRC Region III Chief, Branch 4 C. S. Thomas, NRC Resident Inspector DB 4000 ROPMembers FOR INFORMATION ONLY
Restart Performance Indicators Notes for Week ending February 15, 2004:
- No significant changed for this week
DATA DATE: 2/15/2004 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station BUILDING BLOCK & Restart Performance Indicators NRC 0350 RESTART ACTIONS Performance Indicator Owner Goal at Startup Current Status Reactor Vessel Head Resolution (Indicatos complete and no longer hOt package)
- Reactor Vessel Head Replacement Project Dave Baker Project Scope Complete Complete
- Licensing Issues Resolution Kevin Ostrowskl Zero to Complete Complete Containment Health Assurance (Indicatos complete and no longer hI HOe package)
- EOC Re-Inspections Tim Chambers Zero to Complete Complete
- Containment Focus Areas Tim Chambers Complete Restart Actions Complete
- Open Containment Health Restart CR Evaluations Tim Chambers Zero to Complete Complete
- Open Containment Health Restart CAs Tim Chambers Zero to Complete Complete System Health Assurance (Indicato complete and no longer inthe package)
- System Readiness Reviews Bob Hovland Zero to Complete Complete
- Latent Issues Reviews Bob Hoviand Specified 5 Complete Complete
- BA Systems Outside CTMT - Inspections Bob Hoviand Zero to Complete Complete
- Open Sys. Health Assurance Restart CR Evaluations Jim Powers Zero to Complete Complete
- Open System Health Assurance Restart CAs Jim Powers Zero to Complete Complete Program Compliance (Indcators complete and no longer hI the package)
- Phase I Program Reviews Allen McAllister Zero to Complete Complete
- Phase 2 Program Reviews Allen McAllister Specified 7 Complete Complete
- Open Program Compliance Restart CR Evaluations Jim Powers Zero to Complete Complete
- Open Program Compliance Restart CAs Jim Powers Zero to Complete Complete Management &Human Performance (Indicators complete and no lnger hI the package)
- Management & Human Performance Restart Plan Mark Bezilla Zero Milestones to Complete Complete Restart Test Plan (Indcatr complete and no onger hI the package)
- Restart Test Plan Tony Stallard Zero Restart Tests to Complete Complete Restart Action Plan
- Total Open Restart CR Evaluations Clark Price Zero to Complete I
- Total Open Restart Corrective Actions Clark Price Zero to Complete 10
DATA DATE: 211512004 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station RESTART & SUSTAINED Restart Performance Indicators OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE Performance Indicators Owner Goal at Startup Current Status Operatonal Readiness
- On-Line Corrective Maintenance Backlog Mike Stevens Less than 250 93
- Open Restart Modifications Jim Powers Zero to Complete 0
- Open Temporary Modifications Jim Powers Zero Temporary Modifications
- Open Procedure Change Requests Linda Dohrmann 100 or Less 10
- Open Control Room Deficiencies Kevin Ostrowski Zero to Correct 11
- Open Operator Work Arounds Kevin Ostrowski Zero to Correct 7
- Open Restart Restraints (Mode 4/3) Kevin Ostrowski Zero to Complete 0 (Indicator complete and no longer in the package)
- Open Restart Restraints (Mode 2/1) Kevin Ostrowski Zero to Complete 33
- Condition Report SRO Review Linda Dohrmann 95% or better 87%
- Condition Report Evaluation Linda Dohrmann Decreasing Trend Decreasing
- Corrective Action Resolution Linda Dohrmann Decreasing Trend Increasing Organizational Readiness
- Condition Reporting - Self-Identified Rate Linda Dohrmann 85% or Better 87%
- Root Cause Evaluation Quality Linda Dohrmann 90% or Better 78%
- Condition Report Category Accuracy Linda Dohrmann 90% or Better 94%
- Individual Error Rate Linda Dohrmann < 0.45 per 10,000 hrs 0.30
- Program & Process Error Rate Linda Dohrmann < 0.50 per 10,000 hrs 0.05
- Engineering Quality Jim Powers Average Score of 1.0 or Less 0.9
- Management Observations Mark Bezilla 90% or Better 94%
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION RESTART ACTION PLAN TOTAL OPEN RSRB RESTART CR EVALUATIONS 200
.10 E 100 r_ .. In 2 j Wj 1 D1 @1
_1 i
_1 _1 jn o0 @0
_U j111 _O _i ti_i _0 14 jI j 07 j02 jr _14 _ _
11 _ It jin _n _
_~ aojn a Io o In Ilv
- W n J Urj nWn J _U jU j I j j 1 1 I Ia DEFRNMON This Indicator tracks the work off of Condition Reports (CRs) which have been dassified as requiring evaluation prior to Restart by the Restart Station Review Board (RSRB).
The vertical bar Indicator monitors the weekly addition and completion of these Restart CRs.
These Restart Condition Reports are considered complete when they have been evaluated and appropriate Corrective Actions have been Initiated.
GOAL AT STARTUP Zero to Complete ANALYSIS!
SUMMARY
As of 2/1512004, the RSRB has reviewed 16,583 Condition Reports.
- 6,651 Condition Reports have been classified as Restart
- 6,650 complete
- 1lopen
- of the 6,651 Restart Condition Reports, 2,057 have been classified as 0350
- 2,057 complete
- 0 open Effective August 4,2003, the Restart Station Review Board discontinued the general augmented review and restart classification of Condition Reports Initiated on or after August 1,2003. The RSRB continues to review new Condition Reports associated with NRC 0350 Restart Checklist Items.
Owner - C. Price RA-01 Oversight - L. Myers I
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION RESTART ACTION PLAN ooo0 TOTAL OPEN RSRB RESTART CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 800 am 8 700- -
4600
~300M0O - 1]eE)) -h{t 200 100.
wawU "rom.~wwwalord rail:Rho *~lvirll US 0 NUMS ruwmmml l
= B7 INUMllS TV.l W.
Art Vi Ml In [I a by i 1>-asias I" a u a a a l UN 1 2 7 [151o 0ll *v IXrmapT.T U 41 14fls^" N raMr!w"T vU US 21£ i I inin Itt~ *TIa"TI<TTt TTa DEFINITION This Indicator tracks the work off of Corrective Actions (CAs) which have been dass!led as requiring completion prior to Restart by the Restart Station Review Board (RSRB).
The vertical bar Indicator monitors the weekly addition and closure of these Restart CAs. These Restart CAs are considered dosed when the Corrective Action is completed and updated as dosed in the Condition Report Evaluation & Status Tracking Program (CREST).
GOAL AT STARTUP Zero to Complete ANALYS1SI
SUMMARY
As of 2/15104, the RSRB has reviewed 16,488 Corrective Actions associated with Restart Condition Reports.
- 7,521 Corrective Actions have been dassified as Restart
- 7,511 complete
- 10 open
- of the 7,521 Restart Corrective Actions, 4,057 have been classified as 0350
- 4,053 complete
- 4 open Owner- C. Price RA-02 Oversight - L Myers 2
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATIONAL READINESS ON-LINE CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG 5o0 450 400 350 9 300 3 250 1200 150 100 DEFINITION Number of open on-line corrective maintenance work orders (WOs) as defined by INPO AP-928, Work Management Process Description is the repair and restoration of power production related equipment, components, or structures that have failed or are malfunctioning and are not performing their Intended function.
GOAL AT STARTUP Less than 250 open WOs ANALYSIS/
SUMMARY
During the week ending 2/15/04, 2 new corrective orders were Initiated and 2 completed. The organizational focus remains on emergent work and preventive maintenance activities. The Backlog Reduction Plan Is being Implemented starting January 2004 to support achieving Corrective Maintenance Backlog goals within the Operational Improvement Plan.
Owner - M. Stevens MA-01 Analysis- L. Ring 3
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATIONAL READINESS OPEN TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS lb iI Add = Close -ActualI 14
- 0) 12 0
Ela 2L0 eWa I.-
.E aE6 0
4 2
a L INoI .NI1 Is inI I WWIa" I I I1* 11111 I In Ii*
I Zn 1 no I 1*I I n in ,
U1 1 1 in-UlM In! iI'VWl I *C 1 l 1 A l: 0 2 1a l l l 1 l6
- l
- l l S l l S S l 1l : l S l l 0 0 I i I 0 11 l l l a 4 12 7 0 1 5 I S 4 1 4 4 4 4 I S £ £ 5 I S 1 I 3 1 1 2I 4 a 3 2 3 a 2 I 3Ia1 DEFINION This indicator tracks the closeout of all open Temporary Modifications Identified before Mode 2.
GOAL AT STARTUP Zero Temporary Modifications ANALYSISI
SUMMARY
Significant progress has been made In eliminating Temporary Modifications. Since July 2003,20 Temporary Modifications have been eliminated leaving the 1 described below, which will remain open until shortly after restart.
Temporary Modification 03-0028 will remain installed until after restart and will be removed shortly after plant startup during the next scheduled Awdilary Boiler Outage. This Temporary Modification Is for Auxliary Boiler Feedwater Control Valve ASI 678 which was reassembled without a pusher plate and handwheel. An Auxiliary Boiler outage Is required to repair the valve and remove this Temporary Modification. This work can not be completed prior to restart due to the need for station heating and establishing a vacuum. Once the Station Is on line, the auxiliary boiler can be removed from service to repair ASI 678 and remove TM 03-0028.
Owner - J. Powers EN-02 Analysis - B.Hovland 4
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATIONAL READINESS OPEN PROCEDURE CHANGE REQUESTS 1200 120 I~~ooi lAdd .
1000 .Close- -100
-Actual gB800- 80 b
- a. U l 600 - 60 in 400 40 Coal < 100 2W n n 20 n -inL nj q 0 ?NJ V131 =I W la"Im7low 1 mill ri n!,I, I Du I no Ion I MI 11A "Om 11mi W I"ll"61=1 &I I n Im"jaulm 0
- AN 4 1 1 1V itI I $I 0 it a 0 0 8 I a I 11 I I I &I 11 I I I ItI =in 10- I a I a I WI a I 0-tu I a t a ""G a I El I N I n I n I N 1 73 1 a, "Im V I In L01-21-1 31 I I, I DEFINMON This Indicator measures the number of Category I Priority I & 2Procedure Change Requests (PCRs) which are awaiting Incorporation Into Davis-Besse procedures. The term PCR Includes change requests Initiated as Condition Reports. The above count does not Include category I prlority 3 PCRs as these PCRs are enhancements not affecting procedure adequacy or quality, and category/pdority 4 PCRs as these PCRs are restrained by plant modifications, license amendment requests, etc. and cannot be dosed until these restraints are completed. APCR Isconsidered completed when It IsIncorporated Into an effective procedure or when the PCR Iscancelled.
GOAL AT STARTUP Restart goal Isto be at less than 100 open targeted PCRs ANALYSIS/
SUMMARY
As of February 15, 2004, there are 10 open Priority 1/2 change requests.
Owner - L Dohrmann PR-01 Analysis - D.Meckfessel 5
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATIONAL READINESS OPEN CONTROL ROOM DEFICIENCIES 12 121l1_Add r sCIose -Actual 10 I \
,s8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 i u 71e 12 o o 12 2 WO O OI e 2 o3 o3 2o 2e O e 1 102 111
_ 1S_ 1161 o 1o e 12 412 121 1 oll Ill o 1 51 211 21o 220 S 000 *0 0 S _ 2 _ 4 _0 04 40 06 2 0 0 0 0 I0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0 1 1 1 40 4 0 04 4 0 2 I 8 0 I 0 04 DEFINITION The deficiencies In a Control Room component such as an inoperable process Indicator, alarm function, or component status light and those deficiencies that prevent the operation of an automatic control system or hand operated control switch. Deficiencies corrected Inthe field but awaiting testing for final closeout are not Included as an open control room deficiency.
GOAL AT STARTUP The goal for Control Room deficiencies iszero at restart.
ANALYSIS/
SUMMARY
IniDate Q Prod Descrbation 11/04103 300 TBD Annunciator 9-5-D DSL OIL STRG TK LVL comes hIto alarm early.
12115/03 300 2127/04 E16277, YI Bus Voltage reads low In CTRM compared to local indicator.
12115103 300 McO CV5006 SAM Lght did not respond as expected. (Mid-Cycle Outage) 01105/04 300 TBD Cooling Tower bowdown failed open and must be controlled manually.
02109104 300 T8D HICDH14A position Indication does not match actual 02/13104 300 TBD SFRCS red reset light bulbs broken hI socket 02113104 300 TBD SG 1 FW SNU Control Valve Indication not responding (remalns at 0%)
02/13/04 6O0 TBD SG 2 Operating Level Recorder changed & computer points didn't 02/13104 300 TBD TPCW High Level Tank U reads 1 foot lower than local Indication 02/13/04 300 TBD FWST Control Room Li reads low compared to local Indication 02113/04 300 TBD 2nd Stage MSR Blanketing Steam throttle valve will not throttle from CTRM
- During the week, a thorough review of Control Room tags was performed and a decision was made to add sbc edsting conditions to the list
- As part of Restart, beginning December 15, 2003, Davis-Besse transtlioned from Outage Scheduling to the normal FENOC On-line Scheduling process and transitloned to work planning, prioritization and scheduling hi accordance with FENOC Work Management Process Nuclear Operating Procedures. Control Room Deficiencies are now prloritized and scheduled in accordance with these procedures and may be elevated at the discretion of Operations based on their significance.
Owner - K. Ostrowski OP-01 Analysis - J. Fawcetl 6
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATIONAL READINESS OPEN OPERATOR WORK AROUNDS 20 l IIAdd -CIose - Actual 15 Is 0 . 7I i_ ~ ~ lnl"
~~7l7l1~r " 7r1 1 1 -. "1 t""1'4ari 1~
"~
.4j aa6117i I 17' "" HI n 1
nla p laillt -julg 9 61i ;s eje e I II'l Z DEFINITION A Level One Operator Work Around isdefined as any equipment deficiency or change Inplant conditions which, during abnormal or emergency conditions, will require an operator to perform compensatory actions. A Level Two Operator Work Around Is any equipment deficiency or change in plant conditions which, during normal operations, will require an operator to perform compensatory actions. The above Indicator tracks the number of open Level land 2 Work Arounds. Work Arounds corrected in the field but awaiting testing for final closeout are not Included as an Operator Work Around.
GOAL AT STARTUP Zero Level I and 2 Operator Work Arounds at restart.
ANALYSIS/
SUMMARY
Init Date Prioriv E Level Description 1/30101 300 4/22/04 1 DFP Day Tank Fill Valve DOI 131, must be unisolated to fill the tank due to leakby 6/3103 400 RFO 2 DH2733, DH Pump 1 Suction leaks by potentially lifting DH1508 1/29/04 600 Mid-Cycle 2 SW1358, CAC#3 Outlet TCV not reopening when it auto-closes 2/4/04 300 2128104 2 LG2571, Low Pressure Condenser Boot Seal Sight Glass isolated due to leak.
214/04 (CR) TBD 2 #1SG Wet Layup System Isolations leakby 2/4/04 (CR) RFO 2 MFPT 1 will not stay on Turning Gear due to steam valve leakby 2/6/04 (CR) RFO 2 DH2734, DH Pump 2 Suction leaks by potentially lifting DHI 509 As part of Restart, beginning December 15, 2003, Davis-Besse transitioned from Outage Scheduling to the normal FENOC On-line Scheduling process and transitioned work planning. prioritization and scheduling In accordance with FENOC Work Management Process Nuclear Operating Procedures. Operator Work Arounds are now prioritized and scheduled In accordance with these procedures and may be elevated at the discretion of Operations based on their significance.
Owner - K. Ostrowski OP-02 Analysis - J. Fawcett 7
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATIONAL READINESS OPEN MODE 2 & I RESTRAINTS 1W
- 140-I-
100 - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
0 C 0 80 -- --- I C tlC 60- --- - - +
FL 40 20 u~
_ 111911120 1/21 112211/231)26 1/27 1126 1/29 1/30 2t2 123 W 2I4 225 2t6 2J9 I2W10 211 121212)1312/16 CA 21 22 22 22 25 24 23 19 18 29 27 27 27 27 27 25 24 20 16 14 11 Mode 21 CR 54 64 54 54 45 26 26 26 25 24 21 10 1 10 9 9 7* 7 7 7 7 ORDER -1R13 Fiel Wok 2S 28 28 28 28 24 19 19 12 12 9 9 8 15 13 14 14 13 13 12 9 ORDER PWr 42 41 39 39 39 33 29 29 29 29 20 9 8 B 10 10 10 8 4 3 5 SURV 16 10 10 10 10 10 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 1 1 161 155 183 163 147 11T 103 I99 0 100 83 61 6 66 63 62 0 42 37 33 DEFINITION Any item that would prevent plant mode change based upon open CREST Restart CA's, CREST RSRB Restart CR's requiring evalutation, OPSIAdmin Mode Restraint CR's, 13RFO coded Orders, Orders requiring Post Maintenance Testing, required Surveillance Testing.
GOAL Clear ALL Restart Restraints prior to station restart.
ANALYSIS/
SUMMARY
02/052004 - Field work Increase related to AFW2, HX01 02/04/2004 - CR Mode Hold Resolutions Awaiting Approval = 0 1/30/2004 - CA Increase following RSRB reviews 1/16/2004 - CR increase following RSRB reviews Owner - K. Ostrowski IOPO!5 Analysis - R. Oesterle 8
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATIONAL READINESS CONDITION REPORT SRO REVIEW 100%
!80%
An
.1 a 40%
Ir 20% . . . . . . . . . . ...
1-12 Week Avgl DEFINITION This Indicator measures the percent of Condition Report (CRj Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) reviews completed within one day after the review by the originator's supervision to ensure timely review of plant configuration and operability concerns. The SRO reviews requested by the Management Review Board (MRB) are excluded from this Indicator.
GOAL AT STARTUP Restart goal is for 95% or more of the SRO reviews to be completed within one day.
ANALYSIS/
SUMMARY
Ninety percent (69/77) of the SRO reviews were completed within one day after the review by the originators supervision with the remaining eight SRO reviews having a duration of up to four days. The decrease can be contributed to resources focusing on plant start-up activities, training activities and operating crews benchmarking at Perry and Beaver Valley. Major plant activities have been completed and this trend Is expected to improve. The 12-week average (11/24/03 - 2/15/04) Is 87 percent of the SRO reviews completed within one day.
This performance Indicator has been adjusted through week ending 2/8/04 to remove the time Operations staff were performing peer reviews of the initial SRO Condition Report review. The purpose of the Indicator Isto measure the timeliness of SRO reviews of potential plant concerns. This is accomplished on the Initial SRO review. The performance Indicator was adjusted back to week ending 11/2/03.
Owner - L. Dohrmann CA-01 Analysis - S. Gatter 9
DAMIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERAllONAL READINESS R
CONDMON REPORT EVALUAMlON 0l I
a: l w (4 C) a m em U uw 3m .,, U. 3'. U ml we mm we m ,.3 .4.. we we .3, U. U U -
m11ui1 4., em .m WI Z em mlImIu.IwlmImImh.aIrnImlmImIemImlmImlmhmImIinImImImlmImllww.IawImI1mlmIbIIml I PA m~m~~m~~m~lsa~h~mmhs~m~alm~~m~~m~~w~uemlm~mrn~mw~mm~mmhaI _
I - - - - - - - - . . - - - - - . I Il M n ut--Oen DEFRNION This hdicator meures the rnuber of Restart and N.lestart Condtion Reports (CR) canently open for corrletion of their evaluation. The CR Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) review date Isused as tie saring pcint for new evaluation assigmnents.
GOAL AT STARTUP The restart goal Isa decreasing trend of open CR evaluations.
ANALYSIS!
SUMMARY
The tend of open CR evaluations has decreased by 13 percent wer the last five weeks. The 2,889 open CR evaluations consist of 1,707 (59.1%) - NCAQ (Cordlions NtAdverse to Quality, 1, 77(40.7%) - CGQ (Condtions Adverse to Quallty), and 5 (02%) - SCAQ (Significant Conditions Adverse to Quality). The organizations wtth the highest number of open CR eations are:
Pant Engineering -1,055 open (decreased by five percent)
Design Engineering - 642 open (decreased by ree percent) nltenance - 258 open (decreased by 11 percent)
Operations - 249 open (ncreased by one percent)
Radiation Protectlon -133 open (increased byone percent)
PRect Manageent - 116 open (no doange)
- CR &CA reduction meetings are being set up to begin InFebruary to address the prioritization and scheduilng of met-off by section. These meetings wil be chaired by the Plant Manger.
OMer - L Dohmnn CA-02 Analysis - S.Gatter 10
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION OPERATIONAL READINESS
§ CORRECTIVE ACTION RESOLUTION oGood 0
t1573 MGM GM S3 GM 1 MG 141M 1MGM . 7 121 2 0 0 WsMG 2L YU31 32s a" m us MiM 31 3
a am In , 3, MG3 1II26 1 6 1 2us46M 1 4 . 1 GII J n in DEFINITION This Indicator measures the number of Restart and Non-Restart Condition Report (CR) Corrective Actions currently open for resolution. The Manager acceptance date Is used as the starting point for new corrective action assignments.
GOAL AT STARTUP The restart goal Is a decreasing trend of open CR corrective actions.
ANALYSIS!
SUMMARY
The trend of open CR corrective actions has increased four percent over the last eight weeks. The 8,674 open corrective actions consist of 3,225 (37.2%) - NCAQ (Conditions Not Adverse to Quality), 5,097 (58.8%) - CAQ (Conditions Adverse to Quality), and 352 (4.0%) - SCAQ (Significant Conditions Adverse to Quality). The organizations with the highest number of open CR corrective actions are:
Plant Engineering - 2.089 open (increased by one percent)
Design Engineering - 11557 open (increased by less than one percent)
Outage Management & Work Control - 1,228 open (increased by one percent)
Maintenance - 753 open (increased by one percent)
Operations - 723 open (no change)
Training - 640 open (increased by four percent)
- CR & CA reduction meetings are being set up to begin In February to address the prioritization and scheduling of work-off by section. These meetings will be chaired by the Plant Manager.
Owner - L. Dohrmann CA-03 Analysis - S. Gatter 11
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS 9 §2 A e g9 § ; i i I I E: S I A x - I I F-~12 Week Avg I DEFINITION This Indicator reviews the population of Condition Reports (CRs) originated and calculates the percent self-identified compared to the total. CRs originated as a result of QAIINPO/NRC Input/feedback or CRs originated as a result of a self-revealed Issue are not considered self-identified. The CR Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) review date Is used as the starting point for determining the self-Identified rate.
This Indicator assesses the Davis-Besse organization's ability to Internally Identify conditions adverse to quality. A high value Is representative of an organization that Is engaged and committed to the Corrective Action Process.
GOAL AT STARTUP Restart goal Is for a twelve week rolling average of 85% or more of the CRs originated to be self-identified.
ANALYSIS/
SUMMARY
Eighty-nine percent (180/202) of the CRs originated were self-Identified. The 12-week average (11/24/03 - 2/15104) Is87 percent of the CRs originated were self-identified.
Internal Oversight - four percent (9/202)
External Oversight - four percent (81202)
Self-Revealing - three percent (5/202)
Owner - L. Dohrmann CA-04 Analysis - S. Gatter 12
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS .
ROOT CAUSE EVALUATION QUALITY 10 tart Goal = Improving trend towards > !
"f 8
2 0
l AJ C w=~dvnd"MmuI ~ Rdmmmw i 24EK%AWvAvWWa-- - - -UMO*%"Ad l DEFINITION The top fline of this Indicator measures the percentage of Root Cause evaluations and other designated documents accepted (approved and approved with comments) by the Corrective Action Review Board (CARB).
Root Cause evaluations are counted once regardless of subsequent changes or CARB acceptance after Initial rejection. The differential between the 12 week average lines for Root Cause evaluations accepted (approved and approved with comments), and Root Cause evaluations approved Is an Indication of CARB participation and their added value to the Root Cause evaluations.
GOAL AT STARTUP Restart goal Is for an Improving trend of the twelve week average, then a long-term goal of 90% or more Root Cause evaluations accepted by the CARB.
ANALYSIS!
SUMMARY
One CARB meeting was held during the week ending 2115(04. No Root Cause reports were reviewed by the CARB. There are no Root Cause evaluations currently ready for CARB review. The 12-week average (11/24/03 - 2/15/04) Is 78 percent of the Root Cause evaluations accepted by the CARB.
The twe rejects In December 2003, caused the 12-week rolling average to dip. In the last 24 weeks the average quality of root causes over that time frame Is 90%.
The reduction to the 12-week average this week Is not a result of current performance, but the dropping off of an approved Evaluation from the 12-week average.
Owner - L Dohrmann CA-05 Analysis - S. Getter 13
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS X 100%
CONDITION REPORT CATEGORY ACCURACY Goal > 90 % GodiEi Cd1-.ll . _
3190%
I I 80%
Irlllllll 70%
W6%
50%
P.. , . .S . . _ . I I- 12 Week Avg I DEFINITION This Indicator measures the percent of Condition Report (CR) categories recommended by the originators supervision that do not require escalated categorization by the Management Review Board (MRB).
GOAL AT STARTUP Restart goal Is to maintain a Twelve Week Rolling Average level of 90% or better.
ANALYSIS/
SUMMARY
The MRB changed the supervisory recommended category to a higher level on four percent (7/187) of the CRs. No category changes resulted in an Increase from a condition adverse to quality (CAQ) to a significant condition adverse to quality (SCAQ). The 12-week average (11/24/03 - 2/15104) of CR category recommendations not escalated by the MRB is 94 percent.
Owner - L. Dohrmann CA-08 Analysis - S. Gatter 14
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS INDIVIDUAL ERROR RATE 1.2 lGood;j Is 1.0 01 0.8
[0.6 Restart Goal ' 0.45 E 0.4 IU Long Term Goal <029
-s- - i -i ,-
E 02 0.0 IeII I I_
- e,4,4,oeeet4# 4,44t~ e , le le 4,e-*4,t Pe' 4 o f 4, I Rate - -Rest Goal 12 Week Avg - - - Long-Term oAW DEFINITION An Individual error Is an Inappropriate human action specific to an Individual. The appropriate depth of barriers (procedures, training, supervision, and plant design) to the error are already in place sufficiently to preclude the error from recurring with any other individual. The error had a reasonable potential to affect plant safety, regulatory position, financial liability, environmental Impact or power production. The individual error rate isthe number of qualifying errors per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked.
GOAL AT STARTUP Restart goal is twelve week rolling average < 0.45 Individual errors per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> ANALYSIS!
SUMMARY
During the week, there was one Condition Report (CR) that met the screening criteria for this Indicator resulting In an Individual error rate of 0.24 errors per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked for the week. The 12-week rolling average Is 0.30 Individual errors per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked.
CR 04-01230 documents a condition In which a Technical Specification entry was not recognized. The actions associated with the Technical Specification Entry were completed within the required time, but Technical Specification entry was logged approximately eight hours after the required time.
Owner - L. Dohrmann CA-06 Analysis - J. Grimm 15
ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS I -PROGRAM 1.0 & PROCESS ERROR RATE
[Good, I la 0
C 0.6 Cr Restart Goal < 0.50 I OA . __ lLong Termr Goal < 0.30
}02 l 0111 AL 0.0 1M- _ = _ _a - . --.- = . I
,e e e0#@¢ 0 $ ett e e e 4 4-e$ 0 at 4P e 4# 40 4' 'P - 4ib
~ Rate - - Restart Goa ~~12 Week Avg - - Long-Term Goal DEFINITION A Program and Process Error is an undesirable situation caused by the lack of sufficient information for the performer to complete the task or evolution successfully. It Isa human performance barrier breakdown not specific to any individual because the Insufficient barriers would exist for any other person attempting to complete the task. The error had a reasonable potential to affect plant safety, regulatory position, financial liability, environmental impact or power production. The program error rate Isthe number of program and process errors per 10,000 person-hours worked.
GOAL AT STARTUP Restart goal Is twelve week rolling average < 0.50 program errors per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> ANALYSIS!
SUMMARY
During the week, there were no Condition Reports (CR) that met the screening criteria for this Indicator resulting Ina program error rate of 0.0 errors per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked for the week. The 12.
week rolling average Is0.05 program errors per 10,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> worked.
Owner - J. Reddington CA-07 Analysis J. Grimm 16
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS ENGINEERING QUALITY 120 100 1! 80 I 0,
IP 0 1I 6O 4]
40 20 0
DEFINITION This indicator measures the score for quality of Engineering products as assigned by the Engineering Assessment Board (EAB). The score Is based on an assessment of quality Inthe following areas:
Procedural Performance/Implementation, Rigor in Problem Soiving, Team Approach, AnalysislEvaluation/
Design, Design Basis Maintenance, and Ucensing Basis Maintenance.
Score summary: 0 No comment, product Is acceptable as presented.
1 Omission or error has negligible effect on results.
2 Omission or error has minor effect but requires revision of document.
3 Significant effect on results.
4 Attribute unsatisfactory.
GOAL AT STARTUP The goal at restart is to achieve a twelve week rolling average score of 1.0 or less.
ANALYSIS/
SUMMARY
For week ending February 15, 5 products were assessed with weekly average score of 0.2 with one product being scored as a 1. the rest being scored as 0's. Twelve week rolling average Is 0.9.
Review of the data used to produce the Pi shows a negative trend as of mid November 2003, when all Engineering calculations began to be submitted to the EAB as part of the Calculation Improvement EfforL Prior to this, only select calculations were reviewed by EAB. These calculations have been included in this Indicator and currently make up a significant population of products reviewed.
EAB has provided comments in the areas of design Input, assumptions and basis that have resulted in modification of a number of calculations. The comments are usually of a minor nature not affecting the final conclusion and are Intended to provide additional rigor and completeness This feedback to the calculation originators continues in an effort to improve calculation quality hI these areas and others. During the last two weeks, the weekly averages have been significantly better than the weekly scores since mid November.
Engineering Assessment Board has established a Post Restart Goal of 0.5 or less. This Post Restart Goal has been added to graph and Is intended to be reached piorto the end of Operating Cycle 14.
Owner - J. Powers EN.03 Analysis - P. Straube 17
DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION MANAGEMENT AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE MANAGEMENT OBSERVATIONS wUUI%
90%
I M 80%
8 70% n- wz- I C 60%
2 50% 0 01
.0 40%
0 30%
's20% ----- iW1d 10%
0%
- IIIIIIUU1I t
1 1- IlI 111114111111"1111114411 M g gM an l
- - 12 Week Roiling Average DEFINITION This indicator measures the percentage of management scheduled observations completed for observations of training, operations, and field activities. Management observations are Intended to influence desired behaviors by direct verbal communication which reinforces performance that meets or exceeds expectations (satisfactory - coached), or provides feedback on undesired performance (unsatisfactory - coached). Strengths and weaknesses result from the coaching opportunities.
GOAL TO RESTART Twelve Week Rolling Average of 90% or more management observations completed as scheduled.
ANALYSISI
SUMMARY
Twelve Week Rolling Average Is 94%. 75% (9/12) of the scheduled management observations were completed during the week ending February 15, 2004.
Management observations have been showing an increase In unsatisfactory housekeeping observations, therefore the focus of the week was housekeeping.
Two observations were overall unsatisfactory. One was in the Administration building and referred to the areas vacated by contractor personnel. The other unsatisfactory observation was 657' and 643' level heater bays. Five conditions reports were generated from this observation. The observer stated that overall the conditions were adequate, however, we need to keep on top of these Issues. The Issues were also discussed with the on-shift SRO.
Other observations on the Aux building, east condenser pit, low level rad waste buDding, and general housekeeping tours all showed overall satisfactory results. Improvement Is needed Instorage areas, materials, tools and equipment left out, and the need to keep enforcing housekeeping standards.
Condition Report (CR 04-01131) was generated because the observer noticed a void where BISCO was missing from a penetration.
Owner/ Oversight- M. Bezilla MH.03 Analysis - K. Fehr 18