ML041070089

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Clifton W. Farrell Ltr. Response to Fcss Ticket F2004002- Comments on Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-02: Deferral of Active Regulation of Ground-Water Protection at In-Situ Leach Uranium Extraction Facilities
ML041070089
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/28/2004
From: Pierson R
NRC/NMSS/FCSS
To: Farrell C
Nuclear Energy Institute
References
RIS-04-002
Download: ML041070089 (3)


See also: RIS 2004-02

Text

April 28, 2004

Mr. Clifton W. Farrell

Senior Program Manager

Material Licensees

Nuclear Energy Institute

1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400

Washington, DC 20006-3708

SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2004-02: DEFERRAL OF

ACTIVE REGULATION OF GROUND-WATER PROTECTION AT IN-SITU

LEACH URANIUM EXTRACTION FACILITIES

Dear Mr. Farrell:

I am responding to your letter dated March 23, 2004, that expressed support for the subject

Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS). We appreciate your comments on this RIS.

Additionally, you commented that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) should

relinquish regulation of all in-situ well field operations. You stated that such operations are

equivalent to the mining of ores in conventional open pit or underground operations which

are not subject to NRC licensing. However, in-situ leach operations involve the in-place

(i.e., in-situ) processing of ores to extract (i.e., recover) the uranium. Unlike conventional open

pit or underground mining in which the ore is removed from the earth and the uranium is later

extracted from the ore in a mill, the extraction of the uranium for in-situ leach processes occurs

directly in the ore deposit. The NRC has jurisdiction and licensing authority over the milling of

uranium (as defined in 10 CFR 40.4) unless, pursuant to section 274b. of the Atomic Energy

Act Act of 1954, as amended (AEA), a state enters into an agreement with the NRC which

provides for the discontinuance of the NRCs regulatory authority over 11e.(2) byproduct

material. In the case of in-situ leach operations, either a state must assume regulatory

authority regarding this activity by entering into a section 274b. agreement with the NRC, or a

statutory change would be necessary. We are not convinced at this time that a statutory

change would be a cost effective undertaking.

If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please contact Robert Nelson of my

staff at (301) 415-7298 or by e-mail at ran@nrc.gov.

C. Farrell 2

Again, I would like to thank you for your support of RIS 2004-02.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be

available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the

Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS

is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Robert C. Pierson, Director

Division of Fuel Cycle Safety

and Safeguards

Office of Nuclear Material Safety

and Safeguards

C. Farrell 2

April 28, 2004

Again, I would like to thank you for your support of RIS 2004-02.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be

available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the

Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS

is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public

Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Robert C. Pierson, Director

Division of Fuel Cycle Safety

and Safeguards

Office of Nuclear Material Safety

and Safeguards

DISTRIBUTION: Green Ticket: F2004002

FCFB r/f FCSS r/f

C:\ORPCheckout\FileNET\ML041070089.wpd

OFC FCFB FCFB OGC FCFB FCSS

NAME J.Lusher* R.Nelson* M.Schwartz * G.Janosko* R.Pierson

DATE 4/14/04 4/14/04 4/21/04 4/15/04 4/28/04

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY