ML040760740
| ML040760740 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 03/09/2004 |
| From: | Bliss K Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Pacific Gas & Electric Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, US Federal Judiciary, Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California |
| References | |
| 01-30923 CM, 94-0742640 | |
| Download: ML040760740 (17) | |
Text
)
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 JAMES L: LOPES (No. 63678)
GARY M. KAPLAN (No. 155530)
KIMBERLY A. BLISS (No. 207857)
HOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN A Professional Corporation Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4024 Telephone:
415/434-1600 Facsimile:
415/217-5910 Attorneys for Debtor and Debtor in Possession PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION HOYMMRD 13 oCf 14 FaK dQ 15 16 17 18 19 In re PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California corporation, Debtor.
Federal I.D. No. 94-0742640 Case No. 0 1-30923 DM l Chapter 11 Case Date:
March 5,2004 Time:
1:30 p.m.
Place:
235 Pine Street I
San Francisco, CA Judge: Hon. Dennis Montali 20 21 22 23 24 25
- 26 27 28 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER ON DEBTOR'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OBJECT TO CERTAIN PROOFS OF CLAIM AND FOR RELATED RELIEF
.i NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER ON MOT. EXTENDING TIME TO OBJ. TO CLAIMS & FOR RELATED RELIEF
sI 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 HO0RD 13 RIM NGT 14 EUK eRAMaN Afb-_l~
1 5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on March 5,2004, the above-captioned Bankruptcy Court issued its Order on Debtor's Motion for Extension of Time to Object to Certain Proofs of Claim and for Related Relief, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit l 1.
2 Dated: March 9, 2004.
HOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN A Professional Corporation By:
KIMBERY A. BLISS Attorneys for Debtor and Debtor In Possession PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER ON MOT. EXTENDING TIME TO OBJ. TO CLAIMS & FOR RELATED RELIEF
-I-
EXHIBIT 1
I 1
2 3
4 5.
6 7
8 9
10 11 JAMES L. LOPES (No. 63678)
GARY M. KAPLAN (No. 155530)'
KIMBERLY A. BLISS (No. 207857)
HOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN A Professional Corporation Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 941114024 Telephone:
415/434-1600 Facsimile:
415/217-5910 FILED
- MAR 0 5 2004 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SAN FRANCISCO, CA Attorneys for Debtor and Debtor in Possession PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 Iw~R 13 cEM FAL 14 15 16 In re PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California corporation, Debtor.
Federal I.D. No. 94-0742640 Case No. 01-30923 DM Chapter 11 Case Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:
March 5,2004 1:30 pim.
235 Pine Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California Hon. Dennis Montali 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ON DEBTOR'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OBJECT TO CERTAIN PROOFS OF CLAIM AND FOR RELATED RELIEF At the date and time set forth above, the Bankruptcy Court held a hearing on the Motion For Extension of Time To Object To Certain Proofs Of Claim And For Related Relief (the "Motion") submitted by Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the debtor and debtor in possession in the above-captioned Chapter 11 case ("PG&E" or the "Debtor").
Appearances were as noted in the record.
The Court having considered the Motion, all responses filed thereto, the Debtor's reply to such responses, the record in this case, and any admissible evidence and argument presented to the Court, hereby finds as follows:
,_1-ORDER ON MOTION EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO CLAIMS AND FOR RELATED RELIEF
1 A.
Adequate notice of this proceeding was given to parties in interest as 2
appropriate under the circumstances.
3 B.
There is good cause for.granting the Motion.
4 Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated 5
on the record:
6
- 1. The Motion is granted.'
7
- 2. The time for the Debtor to object to ISO, PX and Generator Claims (listed on 8
Exhibit 1 attached hereto) solely so that their allowance or disallowance on the claims 9
docket in this Chapter 11 Case conforms to the Allowed amount of such Claims as 10 determined by the FERC in the FERC Refund Proceedings is extended until 90 days after 11 ISO, PX and Generator Claim(s) become Allowed pursuant to the Plan. No such 12 objection(s) shall alter the time at which such Claim(s) become Allowed pursuant to the Plan s
13 or must be paid pursuant to the Plan.2 EMERYW cm,,ADY 14
- 3. For purposes of determining the Allowed amount of the Claims described in the 15 chart below, the Debtor will prosecute the FERC proceeding corresponding to such Claims, 16 as identified in the chart below, only before FERC or any court to which an appeal from the 17 FERC order thereon may be taken, and will not attempt to obtain a determination of such 18 matters before the Bankruptcy Court, except to the extent the Debtor has an objection based 19 on a matter that is not the subject matter of the applicable FERC proceeding:
20 21
'On December 22, 2003, this Court entered its order confirming the Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code for Pacific Gas and Electric 22 Company Dated July 31, 2003, As Modified by Modifications Dated November 6, 2003 and December 19, 2003 (the "Plan"). All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the 23 meanings ascribed to them in the Plan or the Motion.
24 21n particular, Section 5.4(g)(i) of the Plan provides in relevant part:
"A Disputed ISO, PX and Generator Claim shall become an Allowed 25 Claim on the date designated by FERC when payments are to be made
- on account of ISO, PX and Generator Claims, pursuant to an unstayed
- 26.
order in the FERC Refund Proceedings; provided, however, that if no date is designated in such order, a Disputed ISO, PX and Generator 27 Claim shall automatically become an Allowed Claim forty-five (45) days after the issuance of such order, provided such order has not been 28 stayed." ORDER ON MOTION EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO CLAIMS AND FOR RELATED RELIEF
1 2
3 4
5 6'
7 8
9 10 11 12 Hm 13 RJCE QEECANAD FAKJC 14
&sRAW(N 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28.
Claims Proceeding.
SCS Related Claims Scheduling Coordinator Services Tariff Proceeding ISO COTP Claim The California-Oregon Transmission Proiect Proceeding PX Chargeback Claims The PX Chargeback Proceeding Imbalance Energy and Emergency FERC Refund Proceedings Services Claims QF Claims FERC Refund Proceedings 4; The time for PG&E to object to the SCS Related Claims listed on Exhibit 2 attached hereto is extended until 45 days after FERC's issuance of an unstayed order in the SC Tariff proceeding.
- 5. The time for PG&E to object to the ISO COTP Claim listed on Exhibit 2 attached hereto is extended until 45 days after FERC's issuance of an unstayed order in the COTP proceeding.
- 6. The time for PG&E to object to the PX Chargeback Claims listed on Exhibit 4 attached hereto is extended until 45 days after FERC's issuance of an unstayed order regarding the issues pending on rehearing in the PX chargeback proceeding.
- 7. The QF Claims Based On PX Pricing listed on Exhibit 2 attached hereto shall constitute Disputed Claims until the date designated by FERC when payments are to be made on account of ISO, PX and Generator Claims pursuant to an unstayed order in the FERC Refund Proceedings, or if no date is designated in such order, 45 days after the issuance of such an unstayed order.
- 8. The time for PG&E to object to the RMR Claims listed on Exhibit 2 attached hereto is extended until the date designated by FERC when payments are to be made on account of ISO, PX and Generator Claims pursuant to an unstayed order in the FERC Refund Proceedings, or if no date is designated in such order, 45 days after the issuance of such an unstayed order. Based on the Debtor's modification of the Motion at the hearing thereon, the Motion is withdrawn with respect to the RMR Claims of Mirant Delta LLC and Mirant Potrero LLC listed on Exhibit 2 to the Motion. Nothing in this Order shall in any way affect ORDER ON MOTION EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO CLAIMS AND FOR RELATED RELIEF
)
\\N I
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 HammRD 13 RCE
-FMEKR c FAA 14
& RIAWN
-`
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 or modify the rights of Mirant Delta and Mirant Portero with respect to their RMR Claims.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no extension of time to object is sought with respect to such RMR Claims.
- 9. The time for PG&E to object to claims which are subject to pending objections or otherwise constitute Disputed Claims as of the Effective Date is extended to until 30 days after the objections to such Claims are finally resolved or such Claims are no longer Disputed; provided, however, that this extension of time to object to Claims does not apply to any ISO, PX and Generator Claims.
- 10. Based on the Debtor's modification of the Motion at the hearing thereon, no extension of time to object is sought with respect to the Other Component Claims described in Section II.D. and Exhibit 3 to the Motion. The Debtor shall have the right to file objections to the Other Component Claims described in Section II.D and/or Exhibit 3 to the Motion as provided in the Plan, and any such filing shall not constitute a waiver of the Debtor's rights to further object to the other components of such Claims in accordance with the provisions of the Plan or this Order.
- 11. Each Claim described in paragraphs 2 through 7, inclusive, in this Order shall be deemed to be a "Disputed Claim" under the Plan until the earlier of (a) the date on which it is Allowed in accordance with the Plan or this Order and (b) the expiration of the period set forth in this Order or any other order of the Bankruptcy Court for objecting to the Claim.
Each of the Claims described in paragraphs 8 and 9 of this Order shall be deemed to be a "Disputed Claim" under the Plan until the expiration of the period set forth in this Order or any other order of the Bankruptcy Court for objecting to the Claim.
12.This Order is without prejudice to the right of Public Utility District #2 of Grant County ("Grant County") to seek adjudication in this Court, through appropriate noticed motion, of the allowance of its Claim. This Order is without prejudice to the bringing of such a motion at any time permissible under the Bankruptcy Code and Rules, without regard to the pendency or status of the FERC Refund Proceedings as to any other creditor.
- 13. The foregoing extensions may be further extended by the Court based upon a ORDER ON MOTION EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO CLAIMS AND FOR RELATED RELIEF
N 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10
- 11 12 OZAARD 13 NEMEROVSKI
£CANADY FA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 subsequent motion filed on or before the applicable deadline.
- 14. Except as expressly provided herein, this Order does not modify the Plant.
DATED:
Q5'lCU.
DENNIS MON TALI HONORABLE DENNIS MONTALI UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE WD 030504/I-14199951kab/1 134872/v4 O ORDER ON MOTION EXTENDING TIME TO OB]ECT TO CLAIMS AND FOR RELATED RELIEF
EXHIBIT I
)
Pacific Gas and Electric Company: Chapter 11 Class 6 Claims Aftected by FERC Refund Proceedings Exhibit I Line No.
Claim No.
Creditor Dollar Amount of Claim affected by FERC Refund Proceedings]
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 13034 12907 9423 9148 13313 7141 12520 12339 13282 8562 12515 11562 12514 12513 12512 12385 12511 12595 12510 12386 12602 7866 12594 8228 8810 8809 8850 13348 11872 12619 8837 8879 12306 10827 13051 5267 6903 8872 11027 8815 7904 13331 13390 9788 12307 8846 AES NEWENERGY INC.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION AQUILA ENERGY MARKETING CORPORATION ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE INC.
AUTOMATED POWER EXCHANGE INC.
AVISTA ENERGY, INC.
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA POLAR POWER BROKERS LLC CALIFORNIA POWER EXCHANGE CARGILL ALIJANT LLC CITY OF ANAHEIM CITY OF AZUSA LIGHT AND WATER CITY OF BURBANK CITY OF COLTON CITY OF GLENDALE CITY OF PALO ALTO CITY OF PASADENA CITY OF REDDING CITY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY OF SANTA CLARA CALIFORNIA DBA SILICON VALLEY CITY OF SEATTLE CITY OF VERNON CONECTIV ENERGY SUPPLY INC.
CONSTELLATION POWER SOURCE INC.
CORAL POWER LLC DUKE ENERGY TRADING & MARKETING LLC DYNEGY MARKETING & TRADE DYNEGY MARKETING & TRADE, DYNEGY POWER MARKETING, EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT EL PASO MERCHANT ENERGY LP ENRON POWER MARKETING INC.
ENTERGY-KOCHI TRADING LP F/KIA AXIA ENREGY LP HAFSLUND ENERGY TRADING IDAHO POWER COMPANY LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER & POWER MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.
MIRANT AMERICAS ENERGY MARKETING LP MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL GROUP INC.
NEVADA POWER COMPANY NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY NUEVO ENERGY COMPANY PACIFICCORP PECO ENERGY. COMPANY PG&E ENERGY SERVICES VENTURES INC.
4,413,049.30' 1,300,000.00' 316,656.48 2,541,961.43 35,914,338.43-43,460,114.64' 89,375,954.76-2,100,977A0 '
1,778,979,543.96' 56,931.83' 756,890.22 180,457.84 5,989,567.00' 1,022,811.17 '
9,346,634.21 -
5,278,530.69 17,936,666.00 5,407,352.00 2,808,258.87 Unknown 495,393.00 2,242,996.21 12J 7,044,463.80' 710,6613' 1,877,645.87-43,052,050.47' 23,276,878.00 13' 306.987,987.77 430,899,624.61 210,461.00 55,393.807.83 34,130,029.97 64,196.21 9,298,945.00 44,847,170.50 117,848,890.93 9,371,434.25 544,078,259.91 2,948,114.00 8,410,635.07 13,214,496.03 5,278,530.69 812,324.33 5,440,745.89 2,191,956.17.
2,211,000.00 Line No.
I 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 1
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 I 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
- 42 43 44 45 46 Exhibit I Page 1 of 2
)
)
Pacific Gas and Electric Company: ChaptcrlII Class 6 Claims Affected by FERC Refund Proceedings Exhibit I Line No.
Claim No.
Creditor Dollar Amount of Claim affected by FERC Refund Proceedings "'
47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 8849 8779.
8072 8043 12313 8540 9407 7864 7149 12318 8045 11525 8826 8824 8821 13290 7903 9693 9699 9700 12322 9408 12662 12928 12329 11550 13018 9713 7863 PG&E ENERGY TRADING POWER LP PINNACLE WEST CAPITOL CORPORATION PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY POWEREX CORPORATION PPL MONTANA LLC PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY.
PUGET SOUND ENERGY RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES INC.
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPALITY UTILITY DISTRICT SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SEMPRA ENERGY SOLUTIONS SEMPRA TRADING CORP SIERRA PACIFIC POWER CO.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES THE MARTINEZ REFINING COMPANY THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS TRANSALTA ENERGY MARKETING (CALIFORNIA) INC.
TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHEELABRATOR MARTELL INC WILLIAMS ENERGY MARKETING & TRADING COMPANY 27,365,101.54 7,842,819.00 71,957,222.08 285,253,313.24 17,217,789.92 2,443,414.94 7,105,362.82 17,828,019.54 65,000,000.00' 346,274,894.00' 39,348,897.91 5,555,325.67 17,419,252.53 32,787,000.00 1,298,218.42 98,182,137.89' 54,716.18 28,313,334A5 Unknown Unknown 36,183,467.00 265,637.16 3,292;622.69 is) 52,452,003.25' 13,373,605.00 4,582,093.11 13,931,448.00 1,083,190.19*"
590,360,209.85 Line No.
47
-48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 Dollar amount reflects claim as described in Attachment to Creditor's filed POC and reviewed by PG&E. Dollar amount shown does not necessarily
- eflect entire amount of filed claim Amount shown is ISO/PX/Generator portion of claim. Claims denoted with
assert a claim for interest in an inspecified amount.
21 Dollar amount includes interest of $26,334.85.
" Duke asserts a contingent/ unliquidated claim for damages arising out of any pre-petition transaction, agreement or arrangement, including without limitation, that certain Settlement Agreement, dated March 7,2001 (the "Settlement Agreement').
41 Court approved Master Settlement Agreement (Docket No.14226) with El Paso will result in the withdrawal (once Settlement becomes effective) of Claim No. 8837 relating to power sales to PG&E through the ISO and PX.
5' Dollar amount includes interest of $17,580.49..
" Pending Enron Settlement provides that Enron will seek to have Wheelabrator withdraw this claim.
Exhibit I Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 2
)
Pacific Gas and Electric Company: Chapter 11 Class 5 Claims Affected by FERC Proceedings Exhibit 2 Dollar Amount of Claim affected Line No. Claim No.
Creditor by FERC Proceedings [I]
Line No.
I 8802 CA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORP 56,505,301.09 121 1
2 12640 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 1,200,000.00 2
3 12385 CITY OF PALO ALTO 5,987,690.73 Il 3
4 12602 CITY OFSANTA CLARA 3,241,09753 III 4
5 8855 DUKE ENERGY OAKLAND LLC 44,764,441.79
"'1 5
6 140 GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION 300,031.31 171 6
7 11027 MODESTOIRRIGATIONDISTRICT 1,894,818.00 1Ill 7
8 13331 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY 6,070,953.90 112]
8 9
12592 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES 170,744,542.00 9
10 9579 THIE CIT GROUP/CREDIT FINANCE INC (Big Valley Lumber) 208,000.00 10 I1 11550 TURLOCC IRRIGATION DISTRICT 935,852.67 115,161 11 Dollar amount reflects claim as described in Attachment to Creditor's filed POC and reviewed by PG&E. Dollar amount shown does not necessarily reflect entire amount of filed claim. Amounts shown reflect what is identified as Class 5 portion of the claim.
121 Litigation portion of claim in the amount S38,510,291.00 subject to COTP Proceeding. RMR portion of claim in the amount of $17,995.010.09 subject to Market Mitigated Prices in FERC Refund Proceedings.
"' Claim for Emergency Services provided under Interconnection Agreement subject to Market Mitigated Prices in FERC Refund Proceedings and Scheduling Coordinator Services (SCS) Tariff Proceedings.
141 City of Palo Alto claim for RMR, Imbalance Energy and Emergency Services is duplicative of NCPA. Imbalance Energy and Emergency Services claims,
$2,464,724.94 and $3,225,228.00 respectively, subject to Market Mitigated Prices determined in FERC Refund Proceedings and SCS Tariff Proceedings.
RMR claim of S297,737.79 subject to Market Mitigated Prices determined in FERC Refund Proceedings.
"s' Claim for Energy sold to PG&E under Interconnection Agreement subject to Market Mitigated Prices determined in FERC Refund Proceedings and SCS Tariff Proceedings.
"61 Per Stipulation (Docket No.13363), the RMR portion of Duke Oakland's Claim constitutes a 'disputed' claim whose allowance is subject to a final, nonappelable order or settlement in the FERC RMR Rate and/or Refund Proceedings.
171 QF pricing regarding claim for Energy Sales under Power Purchase Agreement affected by final PX prices in the FERC Refund Proceedings.
181 QF pricing regarding claim for Energy Sales under Power Purchase Agreement affected by final PX prices in the FERC Refund Proceedings.
X1 The RMR portion of Mirant Delta's claim is affected by FERC RMR Rate and/ or Refund Proceedings.
" T'he RMR portion of Mirant Potreros claim is affected by FERC RMR Rate and! or Refund Proceedings.
" Claim for Wholesale Energy Sales to PG&E subject to Market Mitigated Prices determined in FERC Refund Proceedings and SCS Tariff Proceedings.
1121 Imbalance Energy and Emergency Services claims, $2,464,724.94 and $3,225,228.00 respectively, subject to Market Mitigated Prices determined in FERC Refund Proceedings and SCS Tariff Proceedings. RMR claim of S381,000.96 subject to Market Mitigated Prices determined in FERC Refund Proceedings.
t131Pre-scbeduled and Imbalance Energy Sales claims subject to Market Mitigated Prices determined in FERC Refund Proceedings. A Stipulation is pending to resolve this claim in the amount of $84,487,319.78.
"4qQF pricing regarding claim for Energy Sales under Power Purchase Agreement affected by final PX prices in the FERC Refund Proceedings.
Claim for Energy Sales under Interconnection Agreement subject to Market Mitigated Prices determined in FERC Refund Proceedings and SCS Tariff Proceedings.
1161 Balance of $47,370.11, resulting from 1999 Amendment to Interconnection Agreement eliminating Balancing Account as of December 2000, subject to Market Mitigated Prices determined in FERC Refund Proceedings.
Exhibit 2 Page I of I
EXHIBIT 3
Pacific Gas and Electric Company: Chapter 11 Exhibt 3 THIS EXHIBIT INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I
Exhibit 3 Page I of I
EXHIBIT 4
)
)
Pacific Gas and Electric Company: Chapter 1I PX Charge-Back Claims Claims Affected by FERC Refund Proceedings Exhibit 4 Dollar Amount of Claim that is PX Line No.
Claim No.
Creditor Charge-Back Line No.
I 8835 AES PLACERITA INC.
143,962.87 1
2 9423 AQUILA ENERGY MARKETING CORPORATION Unspecified 11 2
3 9148 ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE INC.
Unspecified 131 3
4 7141 AVISTA ENERGY, INC.
Unspecified 141 4
5 12510 CITY OF RIVERSIDE 3,780.26 5
6 8809 CORAL POWVER LLC 242,154.82 151 6
7
-'10827 HAFSLUND ENERGY TRADING 776,644.59 161 7
8 13051 IDAHO POWER COMPANY Unspecified
- 17) 8 9
9788 PACIFICCORP Unspecified l19 9
10 8849 PG&E ENERGY TRADING POWER LP Unspecified 191 10 I1 8072 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Unspecified 111 1 l 12 8043 POWEREX CORPORATION Unspecified 1111 12 13 9407 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO Unspecified 1121 13 14 12928 TRANSALTA ENERGY MARKETING (CALIFORNIA) INC.
Unspecified 131 14 l Dollar amounts represent PX Charge-Back claims. These dollars are affected by non-Refund FERC Proceedings.
121 Claimant originally asserted claim for PX Charge-Back in an unspecified amount. PG&E, in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.11912), identified the amount as $316,330.90.
13] Claimant originally asserted claim for PX Charge-Back in an unspecified amount. PG&E, in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.11912), identified the amount as $9,292.94.
141 Claimant originally asserted claim for PX Charge-Back in an unspecified amount. PG&E, in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.11912), identified the amount as $44,483.41.
ls) Claimant originally asserted PX Charge-Back component in the amount of $242,154.82. PG&E, in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.11912), identified the amount as $253,379.97.
161 Claimant originally asserted PX Charge-Back component in the amount of $776,644.59. PG&E, in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.11912), identified the amount as $793,134.10.
17 Claimant originally asserted PX Charge-Back component in an unspecified amount. PG&E, in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.11912), identified the amount as $2,271,867.68.
151 Claimant originally asserted PX Charge-Back component in an unspecified amount. PG&E, in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.11912), identified the amount as $1,930,435.90.
191 Claimant originally asserted PX Charge-Back component in an unspecified amount. PG&E. in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.11912), identified the amount as $50,325.59.
1101 Claimant originally asserted PX Charge-Back component in an unspecified amount. PG&E, in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.11912), identified the amount as $9,280.27.
till Claimant originally asserted PX Charge-Back component in an unspecified amount. PG&E, in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.11912), identified the amount as $3,608,874.92.
[121 Claimant originally asserted PX Charge-Back component in an unspecified amount. PG&E, in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.11912), identified the amount as $12.984.80.
1131 Claimant originally asserted PX Charge-Back component in an unspecified amount. PG&E, in its Omnibus Objection to PX Charge-Back Claims (Docket No.] 1912), identified the amount as $629,755.35.