ML040150446

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC Comments (Written)
ML040150446
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/2003
From: Caruso J
NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
To: Roush K
Susquehanna
Conte R
References
50-387/04-301, 50-388/04-301, ES-401, ES-401-9 50-387/04-301, 50-388/04-301
Download: ML040150446 (4)


Text

ES-401 SUSQUEHANNA Written Examination 12/15/03 Form ES-401-9 Review Worksheet NOTE: RESOLUTION OF COMMENTS IN BOLD AND ITALICS 1

H 2

F 3

H 4

H 5

F 6

Y 7

H 8

H 9

H

2.

I

3. Psychometric Flaws I
4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other Ainutia
6. I
7.

IIEIS Explanation U

WA + Ability to interpret poweriflow map-question doesnt do that.

Additionally really a system response question not SRO level.

The question was rewritten to address the WAmismatch and make it SRO level.

S S

S I

S I Licensee indicated may revise the question based on comments form validators. D disfractor modified S

I S

I

Q#

NUREG-I 021, Draft Revision 9

1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws
4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other
6.
7.

LOK LOD (F/H)

(1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job-Minutia

  1. /

Back-Q= SRO UlElS Explanation Focus Dist.

Link units ward WA Only

ES-401 2

Form ES-401-9

2.
3. Psychometric Flaws I
4. Job Content Flaws LOD -

(1-5) Stem Focus I

6.

UlElS

7.

Explanation

5. Other Y

N Link F

U 3

x A

also looks correct. In D why is increase core inlet correct not in references provided. This is a reading exercise that lacks stem focus since testing basis for why it is a problem to control high or low outside the level band during an ATWS. Also EOP basis question si not a 55.42 topic for SROs really RO level of knowledge. In contrast testing TS basis is SRO level per 55.43. Replaced with a new question and new KIA.

General NOTE: the applicable 55.43 reference should be listed for each SRO question