ML040150220

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Qa/Related Forms
ML040150220
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/2003
From: Roush K
Susquehanna
To: Conte R
NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
References
50-387/04-301, 50-388/04-301, ES-201, ES-201-1 50-387/04-301, 50-388/04-301
Download: ML040150220 (5)


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Task Description / Reference.

Chief Examiner's Initials

1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l.a; C.2.a & b) 1
2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) 1
3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c) 1
4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

Iw r,

[5. Reference material due (C.l.e; C.3.c)l

" L, l a

6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1.e & f; C.3:d),

I Qd

~~

7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedbaci provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e).

I/ '

8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g & h; C.3.d)
9. Preliminary license applications due (C.l.I; C.2.g; ES-202)

I b!

I 6'

10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C. 1.I; C.2.g; ES-202)

\\

Facility:

Target Date*

SdQ df,&'444'i4

&4 /77rA b w f Date of Examination. Id3*/0.5

-1 80

-120

-120

-1 20

[-go1

-75

-70

-45

-30

-1 4

-1 4

-1 4

-7

-7

-7

-7 Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

[ ]

1 I.

Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.l.j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g)

I

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)
15. Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)

Y b-4

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

'A T-

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:

SUSQUEHANNA Date of Examination:

12/15/03

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test@),

and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

Item

1.

W R

I T

T E

NIA N

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
2.

S I

M NIA

3.

W I

T

a. Verify that:

(1) the outline@) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test@), and (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensees exam banks.

Task Description NIA

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 4 - 6 (2 - 3 for SRO-U) of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicants response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activities.
d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.

NIA NIA C#

NIA L

NIA NIA NIA NIA V

Printed Name I Signature a Author b Facility Reviewer c NRC Chief Exa 3 NRCSupervis Note:

  • Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c, chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Rev 9 SRO Retest Revision 0 Susquehanna Facsimile

Form ES-201-- i ES-201 Examination Security hgreement

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 2 15 6 5 signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been %f!-

ut orized by the NRC chief examiner I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

s u 5 4.. 1 1.1 4 4 k as of the date of my

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1<//

p
1.
2.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Y
3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers sDot check > 25% of examinations)
4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/- 2% olerall and 70 +/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants
6.
Printed Name / Signature
a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*)
5 &d &?&. b I c Date ~~ (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. NUREG-1021, Draft Rev 9 Susquehanna Facsimile