|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML1002716862010-01-13013 January 2010
Comment (4) of David P. Helker, on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1199, Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Reactors.
ML0934410862009-11-25025 November 2009
Comment (3) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, Draft Regulatory Guide DG-8039, Methods for Estimating Effective Dose Equivalent from External Exposure.
ML0929301482009-10-0101 October 2009
Comment (5) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, LLC Opposing Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1222, Control of Preheat Temperature for Welding of Low-Alloy Steel.
ML0822000512008-07-0909 July 2008
Comment (2) of David P. Helker, on Behalf of Exelon and Amergen, Concerning Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1195, Availability of Electric Power Sources.
ML0808604892008-03-13013 March 2008
Comment (4) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation and Amergen Supporting Draft Regulatory Guide DG-5015, Training and Qualification of Security Personnel at Nuclear Power Reactor Facilities.
ML0403308822004-01-27027 January 2004
Comment (9) of Charles R. Montgomery Support Midamerican Energy Company - NRC Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265
ML0404805512004-01-15015 January 2004
Comment (10) of Richard C. Nelson, United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, on December 2003 Biological Assessment Regarding Impacts to Threatened & Endangered Species Resulting from Quad Cities Units 1 & 2 Licen
ML0400902552004-01-0707 January 2004
Comment (3) of Dorothy Monahan Regarding the Cordova Nuclear Facililty
ML0400807802004-01-0101 January 2004
Comment (2) of Karene Arp Nagel Opposing the Renewal-Extension of Cordova Plant
ML0400807762003-12-16016 December 2003
Comment (1) of Diane P. and Elmus M. Jeffery Opposing the Renewal-Extension of Cordova Plant
ML0404201662003-11-13013 November 2003
Comment (11) of Leslie Perrigo in Opposition of the Licensed Renewal of Quad Cities
ML0403308692003-11-13013 November 2003
Comment (7) of Neill Howey on Behalf of the Illinois Emergency Management Agency Regarding Supplement 16 to NUREG-1437, the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Concerning the Application for Plant Life Extension at Quad Cities
ML0314001772003-05-12012 May 2003
Comment by M. J. Regan Regarding Relicensing/Duke Wheeler
ML0314200312003-05-0808 May 2003
Comment Submitted by Stephen K. Davis Regarding the Endangered Species Consultation Program
ML0314001812003-05-0505 May 2003
Comment Submitted by Ernest Quintana Regarding the Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
ML0314001642003-04-11011 April 2003
Comment by Scott Gardner Regarding Quad Cities Generating Station - Cordova, Il
2010-01-13
[Table view] |
Text
Page 1I I Doris Say NO Mendiola - Say Doris Mendiola - NO to Renewal-Extension of to Renewal-Extension Cordova Plant of Cordova Plant Piage 1 1 6 /0/0 3~7 From: "Karene Nagel" <miamidolfans earthlink.net>
To: <QuadCitiesEIS @nrc.gov>
Date: 1/1/04 8:45AM
Subject:
Say NO to Reneval-Extension of Cordova Plant I am writing to express my dismay and horror at the thought of any extension to the use of the Cordova Nuclear power plant! I am a citizen with a family living in the shadows of this plant. Personally, I which all nuclear plants had never been built! They are a constant threat to our environment, and in fact to our lives.
The waste aspect alone caused by nuclear plants is enough reason for me to object vehemently to them.
In addition, we now face the added threat of terrorists using a nuclear plant for their evil purposes!
Renewable energy is where all of our resources and development should be placed. I have felt this way for many, many years.
All of this aside even, I must stress that any extension of this plant's operations beyond it's original intended use is utterly unthinkable! Surely, this would be asking for disaster! This plant has NOT operated without problems or violations, therefore why would you seek to continue operations of Quad Cities Units 1 and 2, beyond their useful life span of 25 years. There is always an unknown factor of wear and tear on these reactors; this can not be seen or accurately measured, but will over time increasingly put all life around them at higher risk. Also, this plant and most others were designed and built long before 9/1 1; and therefore they have inherent risks to terrorist attacks, which we never planned for.
Please do not endanger me and my family, and our environment by allowing the Cordova plant to continue operating beyond it's original useful life-span!!!
This is truly a matter of life and death, do not let it be a matter of money in some corporate pockets!
Yours truly, Karene Arp Nagel 2617 LeClaire St.
Davenport, Iowa 52803 CD 2EJ CO" ml 0
0%
F), -.
FF]
9Z ml
..- C,,
Z5~
In, y
-0?3
~f~~ =-er;-,) t-<v. _3 1,9bX4 -0c9L?
