ML033510658
| ML033510658 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/2002 |
| From: | Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML033510658 (12) | |
Text
PSEG Nuclear, LLC Hope Creek Initial License Exam Quality
rn rn z U L
-I 3 I
0" S
S I
0 U
CD Y
c) 7i S CD 0 S
-I CD Y
0 U
CD
-I 0
S v)
CD rn f
v)
- 9)
S
- 9) cc)
- 9) 3.
CD 1
I CD
- 9)
S Q
m
- 9)
CQ CD 7
3 1 9) cc)
CD
v)
S a,
m CD 3
I I 0
0 0
3 s
N 0
0 N
3 0
Q
=!?
-I
c) 0 H
H 3
CD e
e ni 3
X m
CD rn 3
=r
- 9) 3 0
CD Q
ca S
Q CD
-I x
m 3
Q CD C
CD 75 0
C
- 9) -
0 Q
- 9)
- e.
0 CD
-I 3
CD v)
S c) e3 cp 3
3 v) 0 C
CD
- 9) v)
v) 0 U
S CD v) 3 c
(D: s,
W CD 0"..
I I' (D x
- ,- 9) 3 1 -
c)
CD v)
- 9) 3 11 cn 0
7 3
Q
2003 HoDe Creek ILT Exam I
Issue:
Less than adequate implementation of corrective actions from the 2002 Hope Creek ILT e x m.
There were nine post exam comments regarding technical andlor administrative issues with the written exam.
\\
1 2003 HoDe Creek ILT Exam Cause:
Competing resources and "Guideline" instruction resulted in a less than adequate implemer'dion of the exam development process Scheduling conflicts and concurrent activities resulted in a high workload challenging t A quality of the exam review.
Contributing causes included misjudgmA-t and assumptions on the part of the exam wrLr.
2003 HoDe CreekJLT E Corrective actions taken:
The industry was benchmarked for'fhe best practices regarding the development of initial'licensed operator exams and resulted in the following program change::
Operationslexam team meeting prior to the ILT class starting to assign responsibilities and accountabilities.
The exam team shall have no concurrent duties that interfere with exam development.
Timelines for exam development mov Re-validate the exam if >5% changes require:'
iring the va I id at ion process.
Re-validate the exam after NRC,re incorporated.
ack 30 c!-y.
al changes
I 2003 Home CreekIlT E Corrective actions taken (cont):
i Nine licensed operator instructors participated in the August NRClMANTG exam writers workshop to broaden exam writing expertise in Operations trai Exam team members will be rotat dically to ensure a current understanding of license candidates knowledge and level of instruction.
The lessons learned from this eventwere revi-\\ved with Operations and Training managem rs 0 n ;, 2 I,
- 1,.
.L
I
.,_: ;; ? I -
I.
I 2003 Howe Creek.lLT>E Corrective actions planned:.
Develop an "Exam Review an-d-Valildation" lesson plan and incorporate into program procedures (January 2004).
Develop a qualification guide for licensed opmtor exam writers (January 2004).
a, Q
0 a,
3 L
- c.
cn m
3 I
cn S
,a, I C.
I O
E 2 5 Q a,
O Q
0 0
a, 3
a, m
c L
S 0
0 v)
Q m
- c.
m r)
L.
r m
a, L
0 0
I I
9 L
S 0
a, L m 0
m I
m t
I z
a, m
Q 0
I 5
I 0
a, 0
a, a,
LL I
I.
L S
C I-m x
a, a,
c LT) r 0
cn Q
5 0 %
X I
acn