ML033490223

Init Exam - 08/2003 - Public Forms

ML033490223
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	09/09/2003
From:	Gody A Operations Branch IV
To:	Sheppard J South Texas
References
50-498/03-301, 50-499/03-301 50-498/03-301, 50-499/03-301
Download: ML033490223 (30)

Text

as of:

5/21/2002 Operations Branch Assignment Check Sheet:

(Includes ES-201-1

& ES-501-1 Rev. 8, Supplement 1 information)

Chief: G. Werner Facilitynask: ST IN EX Task Start Date: 8/18/2003 ITEM DESCRIPTION I DUEDATE

~

~~

~

1 (Exam/lnspection Schedule Agreement (C.1.a;C.2.a&b)

~

I Feb 19,2003 1

INRC Staff & Fac. Contact Assigned (C.l.c;C.2.e)

~~

I Febl9,2OOF1 ATG I 5/21/20a 2

IFacility contact briefed on security & other issues (C.2.c)

I Feb 19,2003 I GEW I01/07/2003 I 3

ICorp. Notification Letter Sent (C.2.d) (Exams only)

I Feb 19,2003 Announcement Letter Sent (PIR & LORT if req'd)

Jul4,2003 May 20,2003 (Apr 20,2003)

Mar 3,2003 (Apr 20,2003)

Apr11,2003 May 4,2003 Issues, & Standards Discussed w/ BC

[Reference Material Due (C.l.d;C.3.c)]

(Date changed per NRC request 1/7/03)

Integrated Exam Outlines Due ((2.1.d&e;C.3.d)

(Date changed per licensee request 1/8/03) l NRC & Feedback Sent (c.2.h;C.3.e) 9' 1Preliminat-y Applications Due (C.l.j;C.2.g;ES202)

//

Jul19,2003 3'

Draft Exams w/ Doc./Ref. Due (C.l.d/e/f;C.3.d)

(Date changed per licensee request)

(Jun 19,2003)

June 30,2003 IO' Peer Reviewer Initials As Reviewed All Parts*

(Date changed to correspond with change in Item 9)

(Jun 29,2003)

July 13,2003 11' NRC Supervisor. Initials Approving for Fac. Rev. (C.2.h;C.3.f)*

(Jun 29,2003)

July 13, 2003 (Date changed to correspond with change in Item 9) 12' Exams Reviewed w/ Fac. (C.l.h;C.2.f&h;C.3.g)

(Date changed to correspond with change in Item 9)

1. Not required for inspections, except as noted.

• Note SupervisodPeer initials required.

I

[] Required NRC-auth. exams only.

When complete, for exams, add to pkg & fwd copy to BC, for insp, fwd orig'l to BC. TEMPLATE Last revised 1011 5/01 S:\\DRS\\OB\\EXAMS\\stp\\2003-IN-EX\\exam assignment sheet.wpd1

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2

-acility: South Texas Project Date of Examination:

8/18/03 I

Task Description Item I Initials h

1.

W R

I T

T E

N

2.

S I

M

3.

W I

T

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

ozw+@&

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using a-least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)*, and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline@) conform(s) with the qualitative an&&

auantitative criteria soecified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Aooendix D.

a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination,v

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 4-6 (2-3 for SROU) of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicants response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered.

number and mix o

a. Author

(*) Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

(#) Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-6 Quality Checklist rSIo 3 Facility:

STP Date of Exam: & /w Exam Level: ROISRO I I

, Initial II Item Description appears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5.

Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or c

X the examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain) from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New rest modified); enter the actual RO t SRO-only question distribution(s) at right 46,o 28, I

7.

Between 50 and 60 (70) percent of the questions Memory CIA on the RO (SRO) exam are written at the comprehensionlanalysis level; enter the actual 31 I t 0 44 1 1 5 RO t SRO question distribution(s) at right

8.

9.

Referencesthandouts provided do not give away answers Question content conforms with specific WA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines

10.

11.

The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet nlw.

Date

a. Author 8/6/03

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:

• The facility reviewers initialslsignature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: South Texas Project Date of Examination:

Operating Test

1. GENERAL CRITERIA test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function to be administer The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s)(see Section&

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

. initial conditions

. initiating cues

. references and tools, including associated procedures

. reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific

. specific performance criteria that include:

designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

- system response and other examiner cues cI(

Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within

~

acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

I%

C.

At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA

a.

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

A umber:

I Date Printed Name I Signature

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewerr)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301 Form ES-301-4

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

cxc IN I

I 0 I

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) k

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

ion team to obtain

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clear1 Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without constraints. Cues are given.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

8.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

dm d, as verified usin

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 6 18 03 Facility:

South Texas Project Date of Exam!

Scenario Numbers: / I 2 1 3 Operating Test No.: /

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES G

Initials

+.4b&

& A ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 omf/Q Facility:

South Texas Project Numbers: I I Operating Test No.:

f I

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

ion team to obtai

7.

Critical tasks (2-3)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 As SRO As RO Reactivity 0

Normal I

• Instrument/

2*

Component Major 1

Reactivity I

• Normal 0

Instrument/

2*

Component Major 1

Reactivity Normal Instrument/

Component Major SUO-U 0

4 4

I

• 1 2*

2,4, 3,6 33, 12,

+,,J &

6 5,6

~

1 5

5 7

Instructions: (1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

(2)

Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions or a one-for-one basis.

ent and component malfunctions should ire verifiable actions that provide insight unt toward the minimum requirement.

abnorma Y conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 for R2 and U2 I

I I

I Applicant Type RO Evolution Minimum Scenario Number 4

Number 1

2 3

TY Pe RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP 4

Reactivity I*

Normal I

• Instrument/

4*

Component 1

294, 112, 3%

r'FJ 596 5

7 Maior 1

As RO I

Reactivity Normal Instrument/

Component Major SRO-I As SRO 0

4 4

I*

1 2*

I 5

5 7

7

234, 396, 3,5,

132, X ? & d 7 6

596 I

Reactivi tv 0

Normal Instrument/

Maior I

I I

I I

I I

I SRO-U Instructions: (1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions or a one-for-one basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight abnorma Y conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per (3) the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

Applicant Type RO As RO Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Number 1

2 3

4 RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP Type 4

Reactivity I*

Normal I

• Instrument/

4*

Major 1

396, 3959 6

5 7

Component I &/

I SRO-U Reactivity 0

Normal I*

Instrument/

2*

Component Major 1

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-30 1 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 for R4 I

I I

I I

Reactivity Normal As RO I*

0 SRO-I As SRO Reactivity Normal I*

0 Instrument, ComDonent I 2*

I 1

1 Instrument, Component Major Major 1

2*

1 Instructions: (1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

Major Author:

NRC Reviewer:

1 (2)

Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions or a one-for-one basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight abnorma Y conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per (3) nt toward the minimum requirement.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 I

SRO-I I

Applicant I

Type AsSRO OPERATING TEST NO.: I for U3 I

I I

Reactivity 0

Normal I*

Instrument/

2*

Component Maior 1

Instrument/

4*

Component Major 1

Reactivity Normal Instrument/

Component As RO 0

I*

2*

1 2,4, 3 4

& m 7

5 5

I SRO-U Instructions: (1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions or a one-for-one basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight abnorma r conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per (3) requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: I for R5 I

I I

I Applicant Type RO Evo I u t io n Minimum Scenario Number Number 1

2 3

4 RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP Type 4

Reactivity I

• Normal I*

Instrument/

4" Component Major 1

396, 3,5, D4.J '

c 5

7 As RO SRO-U I

Reactivity 0

Normal I*

Instrument/

2*

Component Major 1

I SRO-I I

As SRO Reactivity 0

Normal I*

Instrument/

2*

Component Maior 1

Instructions: (1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions or a one-for-one basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight abnorma Y conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per (3) toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

L / < l p

Applicant TY Pe RO As RO Evol ut ion Minimum Scenario Number Number 1

2 3

4 RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP TY Pe Reactivity I*

Normal I*

Instrument/

4*

Component Major 1

I instrument/ I 2*

I,I Reactivitv 1

1

1 4

4 0

SRO-I I

Normal I*

n*

35, 12 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

1 Maior As SRO 7

7 1

I L

I I

l 6 P I

I I

I I

IuIIIelIu inonent I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

SRO-U Reactivity 0

Normal I

• Instrument/

2*

Component Major 1

Instructions: (1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions or a one-for-one basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight abnorma Y conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per (3) toward the minimum requirement.

Author:

7 NRC Reviewer:

( -

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Reactivity Normal Instrument/

Component Maior OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 for *I2 I

I 4

I*

0 2*

325, 6

7 1

As RO Reactivity Normal Instrument/

Component Major SRO-I As SRO 0

I*

2*

1 SRO-U Instructions: (1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

(2)

Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions or a one-for-one basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should iable actions that provide insight ard the minimum requirement.

abnorma Y conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per (3)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 I

SRO-I I

As RO I

Maior I

1 5

1 I

I I

1 5

\\

I I

As SRO I Instrument/ I 2*

I I

I, I

I I

I SRO-U Reactivity 0

Normal I*

Instrument/

2*

Component Major 1

SRO-U Instructions: (1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions or a one-for-one basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included: onlv those that reauire verifiable actions that nrovide insiclht abnorma Y conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per (3) to the applicant; ompetence co toward the minimum iequirementy i-, n A 4 3 Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 ComDetencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Competencies Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control Boards (2)

Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

R1 and R2 SRO SCENARIO 1

2 3

4 SC ENARlO SCENARIO 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I1 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I I

I II 13.71 I

I (I) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

nf"\\ u Author:

b NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 R3, R4, R5 ComDetencies SCENARIO InterpretlDiagnose

~

Events Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control Boards (2)

Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 3 RO SCENARIO 3,4 35, 7

Notes:

(I) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

BOP SCENARIO 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 395

,6 5

395 3,5

.6 I I I Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

~ C A b X ?

NRC Reviewer:

/ - -

ES-301 Comnetencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Competencies I

SRO In te rp ret/D i ag n ose Events Comply With and Use Procedures (1) I Operate Control Boards (2)

I1 RO I

SCENARIO Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 2 AI I -

3 4

SCENARIO 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 I

I I

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

BOP SCENARIO Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 1

2 2¶3

¶4, 5

3,s NA AI I AI I 2

Competencies InterpretlDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control Boards (2)

Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) I SCENARIO SCENARIO 2 1 3 1 4 I

I I

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

BOP I

SCENARIO 1

1 2

3 Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Form ES-301-6 Competencies InterpretlDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control Boards (2)

Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 13 SRO SCENARIO 2

NA AI I -

All -

1 Y3 3

4 I

SCENARIO SCENARIO Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

/

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 U1 and U2 Competencies InterpretlDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Operate Control Boards (2)

Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Abilitv (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

SRO SCENARIO RO SCENARIO Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

BOP SCENARIO tF Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 u3 SRO BOP RO

~

SC EN ARlO SCENARIO Competencies SCENARIO 3

4 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 InterpretlDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

NA -

AI I Operate Control Boards (2)

Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

AI I Comply With and Use Tech. SDecs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

c

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist N/A wf Item Description

1.

2.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3.

4.

Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/- 2% overall and 70 +/-

4% on the SRO-onlv) reviewed in detail

5.

6.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Initials a

I b

I c

Date

a. Grader Mark Haire

b. Facility Reviewerr)

N/A

_c_

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

8/26 /.3

(*)

The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Page 1 bf 4 09I~3l2003 13:45:20 Report 21 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5 Operational Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2002 To 09/30/2003 07/28/2003 South Texas Project / 05000498 I2003301 TAC #: X02244 07/28/2003 0811 112003 South Texas Project 105000499 I2003301 TAC #: X02245 South Texas Project I05000498 12003301 TAC #: X02244 0811 112003 South Texas Project / 05000499 12003301 TAC #: X02245 08/18/2003 South Texas Project I 05000498 / 2003301 TAC #: X02244 0811 812003 South Texas Project I05000499 I 2003301 TAC #: X02245 08/25/2003 South Texas Project I05000498 12003301 TAC #: X02244 08/25/2003 South Texas Project 105000499 12003301 TAC #: X02245 Sites: STP Orgs:4620 Exam Author:ALL Prep Prep Prep Prep RO-5 SROl - 3 Admin SROU - 3 Admin Doc Doc WERNER, G E.

WERNER, G E.

WERNER, G E.

WERNER, G E.

NFF WERNER, G E.

WERNER, G E.

WERNER, G E.

WERNER, G E.

DRAKE, JAMES F.

HAIRE, MARK S.

WERNER, G E.

HAIRE, MARK S.

WERNER, G E.

DRAKE, JAMES F.

HAIRE, MARK S.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

WERNER, G E.

DRAKE, JAMES F.

HAIRE, MARKS.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

WERNER, G E.

DRAKE, JAMES F.

HAIRE, MARK S.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

WERNER, G E.

DRAKE, JAMES F.

HAIRE, MARK S.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

WERNER, G E.

DRAKE, JAMES F.

HAIRE, MARK S.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

WERNER, G E.

DRAKE, JAMES F.

HAIRE, MARK S.

JOHNSTON, GARY W.

WERNER, G E.

c Page 2 of 4 Q910312OQ3 13:45:20 Report 21 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5 Operational Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2002 To 09/30/2003 0712003 STP - South Texas Project RO-0 SROl - 0 SROU - 0 LSRO - 0 Total for South Texas Project: 0 R O - 0 SROl - 0 SROU - 0 LSRO - 0 Total for 07/2003:

0 R O - 5 SROl - 3 SROU - 3 LSRO - 0 Total for South Texas Project: 11 0712003 0812003 STP - South Texas Project Sites: STP Orgs:4620 Exam Author:ALL

x Page 3 of 4 09l03l2003 13:45:20 Report 21 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5 Operational Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2002 To 09/30/2003 STP - South Texas Project R O - 5 SROl - 3 SROU - 3 LSRO - 0 Total for South Texas Project: 11 Sites: STP Orgs:4620 Exam AuthocALL

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledie about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 18 August, 2003 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week@) of jbR~&oo3. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE

1.

Mike DeFrees

2.

S, G - \\ L \\ a e - & -

3.

4. 3 e 5 e k 4 A &zbmdy g@av h -d E ifeecvdhv

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

IO.

11.

12.

13.

14.

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8 Page of =E,

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement 1

Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week@) of / 8 A ~ q of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

o t 3 as

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of /k&n3003.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

I O.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8 Page of A

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week@) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons w o have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did administered during the week(s) of administration, I did not instruct, any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE

4.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8 Page 1 of _L

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement for Validation Activities Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

18 Aun, 2003

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of ilb%4&uu?. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (I)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9. _-

5 Y

+tP' 1 "rF)Ltt

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

NUREG-I 021, Revision 8 Page of 1