ML033250116

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Re Information Request for an NRC Biennial Permanent Modifications and 10 CFR 50.59 Baseline Inspection
ML033250116
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/20/2003
From: Julio Lara
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EEB
To: Cayia A
Nuclear Management Co
References
IR-03-010
Download: ML033250116 (8)


Text

November 20, 2003 Mr. Alfred J. Cayia Site-Vice President Point Beach Nuclear Plant Nuclear Management Company, LLC 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241-9516

SUBJECT:

POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 INFORMATION REQUEST FOR AN NRC BIENNIAL PERMANENT MODIFICATIONS AND 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) BASELINE INSPECTION, 05000266/2003010(DRS); 05000301/2003010(DRS)

Dear Mr. Cayia:

On December 15, 2003, the NRC will begin a Modifications and 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) baseline inspection at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant. This inspection will be performed in accordance with the NRC baseline Inspection Procedures IP 71111.02 and IP 71111.17. The on-site portion of the inspection will take place December 15 - 19, 2003.

Experience has shown that these baseline inspections are extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for the inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups.

The first group is necessary to ensure that the inspection team is adequately prepared for the inspection. This information should be available to the Regional Office by no later than December 4, 2003. The inspection team will review this information and, by December 10, 2003, will request specific items that should be available for review when the team arrives on site. The second group of requested documents contains additional items that the team will review, or need access to, during the inspection. Please have this information available by the first day of the on-site inspection, December 15, 2003. The third group lists information necessary to aid the inspection team in tracking issues identified as a result of the inspection. It is requested that this information be provided to the lead inspector as the information is generated during the inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection.

The lead inspector for this inspection is Robert Daley. We understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection is Fritzi Flentji of your organization. If there are any questions about the inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829-9749 or via e-mail at RCD@nrc.gov.

A. Cayia In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Julio F. Lara, Chief Electrical Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24; DPR-27

Enclosure:

Modification and 50.59 Inspection Document Request (Information for Preparation Week and Information available onsite during inspection) cc w/encl:

R. Grigg, President and Chief Operating Officer, WEPCo J. Cowan, Executive Vice President Chief Nuclear Officer Licensing Manager D. Weaver, Nuclear Asset Manager J. Jensen, Plant Manager G. Arent, Manager, Regulatory Affairs J. Rogoff, Esquire General Counsel M. Nazar, Senior Vice President J. ONeill, Jr., Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge K. Duveneck, Town Chairman Town of Two Creeks D. Graham, Director Bureau of Field Operations A. Bie, Chairperson, Wisconsin Public Service Commission S. Jenkins, Electric Division Wisconsin Public Service Commission State Liaison Officer

A. Cayia In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Julio F. Lara, Chief Electrical Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24; DPR-27

Enclosure:

Modification and 50.59 Inspection Document Request (Information for Preparation Week and Information available onsite during inspection) cc w/encl:

R. Grigg, President and Chief Operating Officer, WEPCo J. Cowan, Executive Vice President Chief Nuclear Officer Licensing Manager D. Weaver, Nuclear Asset Manager J. Jensen, Plant Manager G. Arent, Manager, Regulatory Affairs J. Rogoff, Esquire General Counsel M. Nazar, Senior Vice President J. ONeill, Jr., Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge K. Duveneck, Town Chairman Town of Two Creeks D. Graham, Director Bureau of Field Operations A. Bie, Chairperson, Wisconsin Public Service Commission S. Jenkins, Electric Division Wisconsin Public Service Commission State Liaison Officer DOCUMENT NAME: C:\\ORPCheckout\\FileNET\\ML033250116.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII RIII NAME RDaley:tr PLoudon JLara DATE 11/20/03 11/20/03 11/20/03 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

A. Cayia ADAMS Distribution:

WDR DFT DWS RidsNrrDipmIipb GEG HBC PGK1 DRPIII DRSIII PLB1 JRK1

INITIAL DOCUMENT REQUEST Enclosure 1

MODIFICATIONS AND 50.59 INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST Inspection Report: 05000266/2003010(DRS); 05000301/2003010(DRS)

Inspection Dates:

December 15 - 19, 2003 Inspection Procedures:

IP 71111- 02, Changes, Tests, or Experiments IP 71111-17, Permanent Plant Modifications IP 37001, 10 CFR 50.59 Safety Evaluation Program Lead Inspector:

R. Daley, Team Leader (630) 829-9749 Team Members:

R. Winter, Reactor Inspector J. Neurauter, Reactor Inspector I.

Information Requested for In-Office Preparation Week The following information is requested by December 4, 2003, or sooner, to facilitate the selection of specific items that will be reviewed during the onsite inspection week. The team will select specific items from the information requested below and submit a list to your staff by December 10, 2003. We request that the specific items selected from the lists be available and ready for review on the first day of inspection. All requested information should cover the time frame from the last Permanent Modification inspection exit (January, 2001) to the present. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as possible. All information should be sent electronically if at all possible to (RCD@nrc.gov).

(1)

List of "permanent plant modifications" to risk significant systems, structures or components. (For the purpose of this inspection, permanent plant modifications include permanent: plant changes, design changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations, suitability analyses, and commercial grade dedications.)

The list should contain the number of each document, the title, the revision (or date), the affected system, and how significant the modification was to reduce risk (if at all possible). In addition to the list, please provide a brief (one paragraph) description of each modification and a list of associated calculations and affected procedures.

(2)

List of all 10 CFR 50.59 completed evaluations involving: (a) calculations; (b) procedure revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications); (d) non-routine operating configurations; or (e) departures in methods of analyses.

The list should contain the number and title of each document, and the corresponding number and type of the affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the evaluation applies). The list should NOT include any evaluations in which prior NRC approval was sought and obtained.

INITIAL DOCUMENT REQUEST Enclosure 2

(3)

List of all 10 CFR 50.59 changes that have been screened out as not requiring a full evaluation involving: (a) calculations; (b) procedure revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications); (d) non-routine operating configurations; or (e) departures in methods of analyses.

The list should contain the number and title of each document and the corresponding number and type of the affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the evaluation applies).

(4)

List of any modifications, procedure revisions, or UFSAR changes where it was determined that 10 CFR 50.59 did not apply.

(5)

List of corrective action documents (open and closed) that address plant permanent modification or 10 CFR 50.59 issues, concerns, or processes.

The list should contain the number, title and revision (or date) of each document, the affected system and corresponding documentation (if applicable), and should be sorted in order of significance.

(6)

Copies of procedures addressing the following: modifications, design changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability analyses, commercial grade dedications, post-modification testing, 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation and screenings and UFSAR updates.

(7)

Name(s) and phone numbers for the regulatory and technical contacts.

II.

Information Requested to be Available on First Day of Inspection (December 15, 2003)

(1)

Copies of all selected items from Section I. This includes copies of associated documents such as calculations, post-modification test packages, 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations or screenings and any corrective action documents.

(2)

Copies of these documents do not need to be solely available to the team as long as the inspectors have easy and unrestrained access to them.

Updated Final Safety Analysis Report; Technical Specifications; Latest IPE/PRA Report; Vendor Manuals; and The Latest 10 CFR 50.59 FSAR Update Submittal.

(3)

Please ensure that other supporting documents for the selected items have been located and are readily retrievable as the team will likely be requesting these documents during the inspections. Examples of supporting documents are:

INITIAL DOCUMENT REQUEST Enclosure 3

Drawings supporting the modifications; Procedures affected by the modifications; and UFSAR change papers generated due to a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation.

(4)

Current management and engineering organizational chart.

III.

Information Requested to be provided throughout the inspection (1)

Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams questions or queries during this inspection.

(2)

Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to each team member).

If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the team leader.