ML033140444
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| ML033140444 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 01/08/2002 |
| From: | Smith K NRC Region 4 |
| To: | Nease R NRC Region 4 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2003-0358 | |
| Download: ML033140444 (1) | |
Text
iearv Mizuno - Re: Backfit analysis Pane 1 ier Miun Re
.aki anl.i n 1 From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Karla Smith / iX Rebecca Nease 1/8/02 9:39AM Re: Backfit analysis
- Geary, Rebecca plans to revise the backfit response (analysis) based on the points below. Please let me know if you have any problems with this approach. I do not want her to get too far with this if you do not feel this is the right approach. We are willing to talk with you about it If you think that is necessary.
Thanks Karla Karla D. Smith RIV Regional Counsel 817-860-8271 (w) 817-860-8122 (f) kds1 @nrc.gov
>>> Rebecca Nease 01/08/02 08:33AM >>>
- Karla, As we discussed (at length) yesterday, I will reorganize myANO backfit argument in the following manner:
- 1. Our position wrt Appendix R, IlI.G has always been that licensees must comply with III.G.2 or III.G.3 or get an exemption. This is exemplified by numerous generic (SOC, GLs, INs) and ANO-specific docketed information (SERs).
Rebecca lrrwL Io ii U~is rcc~rd was-d'!Tted in acccrbncZc Vi~th thre Freedom of InfiormatiOR Act, ae-nmptions -le FOIA-00 -J3v